FREEDOM, LIBERTY AND SOVEREIGNTY BLOG

PEEING ON A TALIBAN

2012-01-30T06:35:00.000-08:00

If some unwashed athiest swine pees on a Crucifix, or smears feces on a picture of the Virgin Mary at a taxpayer funded exhibit at the Brooklyn Museum of Art, the liberal elite and their socialist media friends will call him an Artist.

If some communist socialist dirtbag pees on the American Flag in public, the liberal elite and their socialist media friends will say he is exercising his free speech rights under the Constitution!

If some grungy, Occupy Wall Street, MoveOn.org Marxist, decides to pee on a NYCPD patrol car, the liberal elite and their media friends will call that person a 'Freedom Loving 99 percenter.'

But just have four brave U.S. Marines pee on a dead Taliban terrorist who just tried to kill them and their fellow marines, and these same liberal elite and their socialist media friends will call them "Villains" and demand that the most serious charges possible be brought against them.

The Taliban have beheaded Americans, gutted and hung their captives and we are supposed to be upset by a few marines peeing on a Tabiban.

We bet most of these liberal Elites, their socialist media friends and many of the current high ranking people in the current administration and congress, who are so upset with the conduct of the marines, have never even been in a fistfight and most of them couldn't fight their way out of a paper bag if they wanted to, so don't listen to them. Most of them have never faced real danger.

Admonish the Marines Yes - Punish them NO!

As a society of active and former military personnal and police officers, we salute these four U.S. Marines and say: “Judge them not, lest ye be judged!”

Congratulate them and honor them for protecting us against one of the most vicious ememies we have ever fought and hope that they learn to keep their cameras off.

The Blue Templars

THE ANT AND THE GRASSHOPPER - TWO VERSIONS OF AN OLD FABLE

2012-01-21T13:00:00.000-08:00

THE TRADITIONAL CONSERVATIVE VERSION:

The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.

The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.

Come winter, the ant is warm and well fed.

The grasshopper has no food or shelter, so he dies out in the cold.

MORAL OF THE OLD STORY: Be responsible for yourself!

---------------------------------------------------

THE PROGRESSIVE-SOCIALIST VERSION

The ant works hard in the withering heat and the rain all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.

The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.

Come winter, the shiveringgrasshopper calls a press conference and demands to know why the ant should be allowed to be warm and well fed while he is cold and starving.

CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN, and ABC show up to provide pictures of the shivering grasshopper next to a video of the ant in his comfortable home with a table filled with food.

America is stunned by the sharp contrast. How can this be, that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so?

Kermit the Frog appears on Oprah's Show with the grasshopper and everybody cries when they sing,'It's Not EasyBeing Green...'

Occupy the Anthill stages a demonstration in front of the ant's house where the news stations film the SEIU group singing, We shall overcome.

Then Rev. Jeremiah Wright has the group kneel down to pray for the grasshopper's sake, while he damns the ants.

President Obama condems the ant and blames President Bush 43, President Bush 41, President Reagan, Christopher Columbus, Sarah Palin and the Pope for the grasshopper's plight..

Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid exclaim in an interview with Larry King that the ant has
gotten ric h off the back of the grasshopper, and both call for an immediate tax hike on the ant to make him pay his fair share.

Finally, the EEOC drafts the Economic Equity & Anti-Grasshopper Act retroactive to the beginning of the summer.

The ant is fined for not having a formal Affirmative Action program and for not hiringe a correct proportionate number of green bugs and, having nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the GovernmentGreenCzar
and given to the grasshopper.

The story ends as we see thegrasshopper and his free-loading friends finishing up the last bits of the ant's food while the government house he is in, which, as you recall, just happens to be the ant's old house, crumbles around them because thegrasshopper doesn't maintain it.

The ant has disappeared in the snow, never to be seen again.

The grasshopper is found dead in a drug related incident, and the house, now abandoned, is taken over by a gang of spiders who terrorize the ramshackle, once prosperous and peaceful, neighborhood.

The entire Nation collapses bringing the rest of the free world with it.

MORAL OF THE STORY:

Be careful how you vote in 2012.

I've posted this article because I believe that you are an ant, not a grasshopper!
Make sure that you pass this on to other taxpaying ants.

Don't bother sending it on to any grasshoppers because they wouldn't understand it, anyway

JOHN WALLACE RADIO: THE FEDERAL RESERVE CARTEL AND THE EIGHT FAMILIES THAT RULE THE WORLD

2012-01-17T07:35:00.000-08:00

My Show this Wednesday - January 18th at 6:00PM EST

My guest this week is Mr. Dean Henderson, the author of "Big Oil and Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families and Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics and Terror Network." Through extensive research, Mr. Henderson has pulled back the covers to expose a centuries-old cabal of global oligarchs, whose hegemony over the global economy is based on control of the planet’s three most valuable commodities: oil, guns and drugs- combined with ownership of the world’s central banks.

Henderson has uncovered evidence that implicates these oligarchs in orchestrating a string of conspiracies from Pearl Harbor to the Kennedy Assassination to 911. He has followed the trail of dirty money up the food chain to the interbred Eight Families who - from their City of London base - control the Four Horsemen of Oil, the global drug trade and the permanent war economy. Mr. Henderson has managfed to shine a giant spotlight on the Money Power that secretively rules the world.

He identifies the Four Horsemen of Banking (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo) and shows how they own the Four Horsemen of Oil (Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell, BP Amoco and Chevron Texaco); in tandem with Deutsche Bank, BNP, Barclays and other European old money behemoths. But their monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil patch. According to company 10K filings to the SEC, the Four Horsemen of Banking are among the top ten stock holders of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation in the world. Tune in to find out the truth, or call in to tell me what's on your mind; and of course, there is more ...............

SHOW LIVE CALL IN NUMBER: 646-200-0326

If you want to call in live and speak to the host, while the show is on the air, dial the above number. You will be placed into the caller queue where you will still be able to hear the show while you are on hold. You can also listen to the show on your I-phone or other cell phones. If you would rather not talk on the show, you can also go to the show's Chat Room and text your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.

Click on the link below to go to the show website

www.BlogTalkRadio.com/JohnWallace

For Liberty,
John Wallace

TACK'S TACKLE SHOP AND THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

2012-01-14T06:06:00.000-08:00

When I was growing up in the Inwood section of upper Manhattan, I remember when I was about 12 or 13 years old I had my first contact with discovering what a “front” was for another business. It was called Tack’s Tackle Shop. When it first opened, it looked like just another business. The guy in the store, Tack, was selling fishing rods, live bait and an array of fishing equipment. It didn’t take long before the kids in the neighborhood figured out that perhaps there was something else going on.

The live bait in the window wasn’t alive anymore and local hoods and gangster type people seemed to be going in and out, particularly in the evenings and none of them looked like fishermen. It wasn’t long before the place was raided by the NYCPD and my friends and I all watched from across the street as “Tack” came out in handcuffs along with a bunch of other men. We were later told that Tack’s Tackle Shop had actually been a front for an illegal gambling operation.

A “front group” can be any entity that is set up to appear to be a legitimate independent organization, like Tack’s Tackle Shop, when it is actually controlled from behind the scenes by another organization or group of individuals. These front groups are often legitimate businesses, social or political organizations, professional groups, advocacy groups, research organizations, etc. Organized crime has used legitimate front organizations for many decades to launder their income from various illegal activities. Pharmaceutical companies have used front organizations to advocate for the drugs they manufacture. International terrorist organizations have their front groups here in the United States and as the evidence clearly shows, so do the international bankers.

After researching the formation and activities of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) it appears that it may be a very sophisticated version of “Tack’s Tackle Shop.” The CFR was specifically set up to carry out the goals and objectives of international bankers and other globalists so that the public positions taken by the CFR would appear to be independent positions that could not be directly connected to the international bankers and globalists who personally control and fund the CFR.

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) was founded in 1921 by a very select group of international bankers, Wall Street lawyers and wealthy “old money” families sometimes called the Establishment or the Elites. Among the CFR’s founders were JP Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, “Colonel” Edward House (Marxist. globalist and close advisor to President Wilson), Paul Warburg (international banker), Otto Kahn and Jacob Schiff (both international investment bankers). The CFR’s stated purpose at that time was to improve the understanding of US foreign policy and international affairs through the exchange of ideas. The select membership has been gradually expanded over the years, now totaling around 4,000 and includes various professionals, corporate CEO’s, college presidents, media owners and reporters, high-ranking government officials and even high ranking US military officers.

These same international bankers that started the CFR were instrumental in getting President Woodrow Wilson to sign the Federal Reserve Act into existence in 1913 that basically gave these international bankers the power to print money and control our entire economy. To show you the mind set of this core group, one of the founding CFR members, Edward House, authored a book in 1912 entitled “Philip Dru: Administrator” in which he laid out a fictionalized plan for the conquest of America. In the book, he told of a conspiracy by which a group of wealthy businessmen would gain control of both the Democratic and Republican parties and use them as instruments for the creation of a socialist world government.

After signing the Federal Reserve Act into law, President Woodrow Wilson later admitted, "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country….(America is) no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." He was, of course, talking about the international bankers and the creation of the first great nationwide “front organization” called the Federal Reserve that was designed to directly benefit the international bankers at the expense of the American taxpayers.

The late Carroll Quigley (mentor and advisor to former President Clinton) who was a long term member of the CFR, wrote in his book “Tragedy & Hope”: "The CFR is the American Branch of a society….which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established."

Rear Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the CFR for 16 years, sounded the alarm about the real intent of the CFR and pointed out that there was two separate cliques within the CFR:

1. The first and most powerful clique wants to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and national independence of the United States.

2. The second clique of international members is comprised of Wall Street international bankers and their key agents who want to receive a world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in control of global government.

Congressman John Rarick, a recipient of the Bronze Star and Purple Heart in World War II and a Democrat from Louisiana who once argued with his party over its increasing liberalism, said, "The CFR, dedicated to one-world government, financed by a number of the largest tax-exempt foundations, and wielding such power and influence over our lives in the areas of finance, business, labor, military, education, and mass communication-media, should be familiar to every American concerned with good government, and with preserving and defending the U.S. Constitution and our free-enterprise system. Yet, the nation’s right-to-know machinery, the news media, usually so aggressive in exposures to inform our people, remain conspicuously silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their activities.”

By using the CFR as a front organization to push their globalist agenda for America and the world, the “Establishment Elites and International Bankers” have managed to gain significant influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of our government. They can not only advocate their new world order ideas from within the government by using their CFR members in high government positions, but they can also use individual CFR members and research groups financed by their non-profit foundations to bring pressure from another direction.

The international bankers use this progressive process to implement the step by step decisions that will gradually convert the US from a sovereign nation to a subservient position in the new world order run by appointed bureaucrats selected by the international bankers. The CFR is being used much in the same manner as “Tack’s Tackle Shop” was used by an organized criminal group. The international bankers behind the CFR want to give the public the outward appearance of legitimacy in order that they can slowly accomplish their illegal objectives to usurp the US Constitution and the sovereignty of this country.

Many of the most influential international bankers, Wall Street CEOs, politicians, academics and media owners and TV personalities are members of the CFR. They join the CFR for the same reasons that other people join similar business organizations: to make political or business contacts, to enjoy the prestige of being in the organization or to simply use their connections to make more money. The CFR in turn, uses the broad influence of these people and their organizations to slowly infiltrate their globalist ‘New World Order’ plans into American life.

CFR members and their ghost writers author scholarly articles that are designed to specifically affect public opinion and future government decision making. These authors and researchers are oftentimes funded directly by one or more of the international bankers’ non-profit foundations. The CFR’s well paid academics expound on the wisdom of a united world and the CFR media members disseminate the message.

In the 1940’s, President Roosevelt began bringing CFR members into the State Department and they have dominated it ever since. CFR members were instrumental in the creation of the United Nations. The American delegation to the San Francisco meeting that drafted the charter of the United Nations in 1949 included CFR members Nelson Rockefeller, John Foster Dulles, John Mc Cloy and the Secretary-General of the conference, Alger Hiss, who was later arrested as a spy for Russia. In all, the CFR sent at least forty-seven of its members in the United States delegation, effectively controlling the outcome.

These same CFR members were also instrumental in using our country’s new membership in the United Nations to create the concepts of “limited wars” and “police actions” that were designed to circumvent the US Constitution and permit an administration to send our troops to war without a formal Declaration of War.

It should also be pointed out that these two concepts benefit the international bankers and large corporations most because they allow these entities to make huge profits by providing financing and/or equipment and products to the enemies of our country during the conflict. It definitely did not benefit the US military men and women who were wounded or died in these conflicts. If a Declaration of War was declared, these same bankers and corporation CEO’s would be charged with treason for aiding the enemy during a time of war.

James Warburg, a CFR member and son of CFR founder Paul Warburg testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950, defiantly telling the Senators that: “We shall have world government, whether or not you like it – by conquest or consent.”

On November 25, 1959, the Council on Foreign Relations published “Study No. 7”, which openly declared its true purpose to bring about a New World Order through the manipulation of U.S. foreign policy and through international economic interdependence:

• "...building a New International Order [which] must be responsive to world aspirations for peace, [and] for social and economic change...an international order [code for world government]...including states labeling themselves as 'Socialist.'"

The plan for the New World Order and the ultimate control of America by the international bankers, was clearly outlined once again in the April 1974 issue of “Foreign Affairs” the Council of Foreign Relations’ own publication, when CFR member and former Secretary of State Richard N. Gardner, wrote an article entitled “The Hard Road to World Order” in which he stated:
• “In short, the house of world order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old fashioned assault…” one way to garner public support for new international treaties would be to propagandize world wide predicaments. If people are scared of terrorism, financial chaos or global warming, they will be willing to cede their national sovereignty, freedom and liberties for global authority.”

Since the FDR administration, all transition teams and administrations have been full of CFR members. It didn’t matter whether they were liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican. The Nixon administration had over 115 CFR members all in key Executive branch positions, most of who continued into the Ford years. Ronald Reagan wasn’t a CFR member, but his Vice President George HW Bush was a CFR member, and so were 28 members of his transition team alone. The Clinton administration had over 150 CFR members in key executive positions. George W. Bush is not a CFR member either, but his father and uncle are, his Vice President Dick Cheney is, and his administration is swarming with CFR members. The Obama administration is packed with CFR members and he has also staffed many of its administration’s key executive branch positions with CFR members.

CFR Domination Continues
During his campaign, Obama selected the ubiquitous Zbigniew Brzezinski (CFR), promoter of the “regional” approach to world government, as one of his top foreign policy advisors. Obama called Brzezinski “one of our more outstanding thinkers” and “somebody I have learned an immense amount from.” Presumably Brzezinski’s teachings included the world government he advocates.

For Treasury Secretary, Obama chose Timothy Geithner: Senior Fellow in International Economics at the CFR, Bilderberger, former head of the New York Federal Reserve, and former employee of both the IMF and Kissinger Associates. One doesn’t get more establishment than that! It is Geithner who is managing the bailout of Wall Street with taxpayer dollars. Assisting Geithner at Treasury in overseeing the auto industry bailout is fellow CFR member Stephen Rattner.

For Director of the National Economic Council — a U.S. government agency created by a Bill Clinton executive order — Obama selected Lawrence Summers (CFR, Bilderberger). Former Chief Economist at the World Bank, his last position was at the investment firm of D. E. Shaw & Co, where he earned $5.2 million in one year while working one day per week. Henry Kissinger had said Summers should “be given a White House post in which he was charged with shooting down or fixing bad ideas.”

For Defense Secretary, Obama elected to continue with Bush pick Robert Gates (CFR, Bilderberger). During the Carter administration, Gates served as a special assistant to Zbigniew Brzezinski. In 2004, he co-chaired a CFR Task Force on Iran with Brzezinski, who lauded Gates in Time in 2008. Joining Gates in the Defense Department are fellow CFR members Michele Flournoy (Under Secretary of Defense for Policy), Jeh C. Johnson (Defense Department General Counsel), and Kathleen Hicks (Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Strategy, Plans and Forces).

For Secretary of State, Obama chose Hillary Clinton, who has attended the top-secret Bilderberger meetings. Hillary is not a CFR member, but husband Bill is, and her State Department is laden with CFR members, including James B. Steinberg (Deputy Secretary of State), William J. Burns (Under Secretary for Political Affairs), Susan Rice (U.S. Ambassador to the UN), Jacob J. Lew (Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources), Todd Stern (Special Envoy for Climate Change), and many others.

The Department of Homeland Security, which many Americans fear may turn our country into an Orwellian surveillance society, was conceived before 9/11 by a task force called the U.S. Commission on National Security, nine of whose 12 members belonged to the CFR. The administration of the department under Obama is particularly heavy with CFR members, including Janet Napolitano (Secretary), Jane Holl Lute (Deputy Secretary), Juliette Kayyem (Assistant Secretary, Office of Intergovernmental Programs), and Alan Bersin (Assistant Secretary, Office of International Affairs).

Thus the CFR continues to dominate our government’s key areas: finance, defense, foreign policy, and security. To this may be added various other Obama CFR appointees, such as Mona Sutphen (White House Deputy Chief of Staff), Paul Volcker (Chairman, Economic Recovery Advisory Board), Peter Cowhey, (Senior Counsel, Office of U.S. Trade Representative), and Eric Shinseki (Secretary of Veterans Affairs).

So much for change!

What do Dan Rather, Barbara Walters, Jim Lehrer, Marvin Kalb, Diane Sawyer, Andrea Mitchell and Tom Brokaw have in common? Answer: They are all members of the CFR.

What does the NY Times, Washington Post, Wall Street journal, LA Times, Boston Globe, Baltomor Sun, Chicage Sun-Times, Houston Post, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Arkansas Gazette, DesMoine Register and Tribune, Louisville Courier, the AP, UPI, Reuters, the Gannett Co, Walt Disney, ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox Networks, Clear Channel have in common: Answer: They are all members of the CFR.

Freedom of the press has always been vital to the preservation of our American Republic. Ever since the early years of our country, it was the American “free press” that stood tall between us and the crooked international bankers, industrialists and corrupt government officials. While some of the major newspapers in the big cities were controlled by establishment types like William Randolph Hearst, who definitely influenced the content, most of the newspaper owners and reporters were independent and honorable people who chose to keep their integrity by pursuing the truth. Most local newspapers, radio stations, and later on TV stations, were owned locally.

As they grow larger and eliminate their competition, major media corporations and international bankers are choosing what you will see on the nightly news while trying to trick you into believing it is unbiased reporting. The very news stories that you are fed by the mainstream media are manipulated to mirror the public relations campaigns of corporations, international bankers and even their favorite presidential candidates.

If this is not the case then why, during the course of the 2008 election, was there no mention of the issues that were important to Americans: the threat by big government to our freedoms, liberties and sovereignty; the actions of the Federal Reserve and the issuance fiat money; the drugging of 6 million of our nation’s youth; or amnesty for illegal aliens. Popular candidates like Ron Paul were either ignored by the media, excluded from most of the TV debates, or asked fewer questions than their CFR candidate counterparts. Of the top twenty media corporations in the U.S, 18 are members of the CFR.

The CFR's strategy is to use their members in the media to promote the need for world government in order to fight international threats like global warming. Both Obama and McCain made the environment a major issue in the campaign, but avoided mentioning the immigration issue. In 2012, we still do not hear much about the illegal alien invasion of America.

The CFR has long identified the worldwide environmental movement as a means to advance its agenda and has even suggested a global tax on all developed nations, payable to the United Nations of course. Most of the major media companies are now controlled by individuals or organizations that are members of the CFR, including the international bankers. One of the techniques used by the CFR and its membership has been to manipulate the news in such as way as to push their internationalist views on the rest of us.

As the big media corporations keep merging into larger and more powerful companies, they will be able to control public opinion as never before. With their friends in congress and in key government agencies, all the international bankers and their CFR members need to do is advocate bringing back the “Fairness Doctrine” and regulating the internet and their control of the media will be complete.

The average American might find the CFR’s powerful influence over America's government very difficult to understand or believe, but never forget that the CFR was founded by international bankers for the express purpose of bringing about socialism and world government. It is the deliberate plan of these international Elites, who hide in the shadows and pull the strings of their marionettes, to gradually increase their influence and domination over America’s domestic and foreign affairs. CFR members have been in control of our government since the 1940’s. If CFR members are supposed to be the nation’s best and brightest in running the federal government and overseeing foreign affairs, why is the country in such a mess under their eighty year watch? The answer is: That’s the plan.

The international bankers behind the Federal Reserve and the CFR are deliberately trying to usurp the US Constitution and gradually destroy our freedoms, liberties and sovereignty in the process. They are using the Federal Reserve System to bankrupt the country so we will be at their mercy. The deeper in debt our country goes, the richer and more powerful these international bankers become. If action is not taken to take back control of our nation’s currency from the criminals in the private international banking cartel and if the CFR’s influence over the highest levels of our federal government isn't soon broken, America will be reduced to a third world nation controlled by a socialistic world government where our freedoms and liberties would have disappeared and our national sovereignty is but a fond memory.

Many Americans believe that we may have reached a point where it no longer matters which party or candidate wins the election, because both candidates are already beholden to special interest groups and the winner will staff the high level executive positions with CFR members.

The activities of the international bankers behind the Council on Foreign Relations and the Federal Reserve should be thoroughly investigated by an independent prosecutor. If criminal activities are uncovered, then those involved should be prosecuted under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) as an ongoing criminal conspiracy.

The American people must not give up their liberties for the false sense of security offered by the international bankers and their CFR puppets. The grip of these international criminals must be broken and the threats against our liberties, freedoms and our nation’s sovereignty must be eliminated. It can only be accomplished by a demand for action by a determined and educated American citizenry, as well as by an honest and thorough federal criminal investigation.

I close this article with a quote from David Rockefeller, the former Chairman and the current Honorary Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relation and ask you to consider the implications of what he has said:

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years... It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."

- David Rockefeller, Bilderberg Meeting, June 1991 Baden, Germany

For more information about John W. Wallace, or to find out about his positions on other issues, please go to: www.TeaPartyRep.com

BARACK OBAMA AND THE 'WHERE'S WALDO' PRESIDENCY

2011-11-29T15:18:00.000-08:00

You can always tell when someone is over their head in their job or just plain incompetent, because whenever the "you know what hits the fan" these type of people are nowhere to be found. They take a couple of days off, go on vacation or tell you that they are just too busy to get involved. We call these people "empty suits" because there's nothing inside. It's all image and marketing. While the unconstitutional Super Committee apparently has admitted defeat, where is our president? We are being told that failure to reach an agreement on next year's budget will have very serious consequences not only for the American people, but for the world economy as well. This crisis demands Presidential leadership

But, where's Waldo, I mean Barack Obama?

It might come as a surprise to you, or maybe not, that Mr. Obama and his family have just finished another vacation, this time in Hawaii (or was it Asia?) Yes, I know he just returned from another vacation on Cape Cod, but it seems that our president is willing to do almost anything or go anywhere, to avoid making decisions. Rather than getting involved in actually making important national decisions, he travels around the world making speeches, posing for photo ops and generally campaigning for the 2012 election.

For the first three years of his term, President Obama has consistently avoided taking any specific position or stepping up early and providing leadership on the issue of fiscal responsibility or any other issue. He even walked away from his own presidential commission, the one led by former Sen. Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.) and former White House Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles, when he found its report filled with unpopular choices that might effect his reelection.

Now at a time when presidential leadership is sorely needed to push this critical super committee to do something dramatic and substantial to bring the nation’s fiscal house back into order, the president once again disappears. It causes one to wonder, why and:

Where's Waldo, I mean Barack Obama?

The general consensus is that neither he, nor the incompetent White House staff and advisors around him, feel there is any positive public relations position in Mr. Obama stepping up as a leader and making some difficult decisions that might straighten out our nation’s fiscal future. How could he hammer the Republicans in the next election if some problems are actually solved?

Mr. Obama is apparently too busy traveling around the world and the country to get involved.

As Newt Gingrich recently said:

"As an American I am not so shocked that Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize without any accomplishments to his name, because America gave him the White House based on the same credentials."

How in the world did the American people elect a person who we know nothing about; who never had a real job; who associated with marxists and communists for most of his life; who may or may not be a natural born citizen; who was a do-nothing US and State Senator; whose entire background has been sealed and who, by his own actions, is obviously incompetent, unqualified and/or totally unprepared for the duties and responsilities of Presidency?

No matter how Mr. Obama managed to get elected to the Presidency, the fact remains that the American people are suffering and will continue to suffer because of it.

FREEDOM IN AMERICA: DEATH BY A THOUSAND THREADS

2011-11-02T10:31:00.000-07:00

In 1726, Jonathan Swift wrote“Gulliver’s Travels” which was a story of an English surgeon, named Lemuel Gulliver, who takes to the high seas when his business in England fails. Gulliver's multiple adventures begin in a place called Lilliput when he awakens on a beach after a shipwreck only to find himself immobilized and tied down by thousands of tiny threads woven around him by the very tiny Lilliputians.

If Gulliver had been awake, he could easily have snapped these threads individually or in small numbers and the Lilliputians would never have succeeded in taking control of Gulliver and making him their prisoner. Those tiny threads were multiplied and woven hundreds and thousands of times by the Lilliputians while Gulliver was sleeping. By the time Gulliver finally did wake up, it was too late. He was totally incapacitated and unable to do anything. He was at the mercy of his new masters, the Lilliputians.

Just like Gulliver, the American people appear to be either asleep or unaware of the growing danger of being incapacitated by America’s own version of the Lilliputians, who are nothing more than well financed traitors to this great country. In our case, the threads used to take our freedoms are restrictive laws,‘green’ regulations, international agreements and treaties, presidential executive orders, unconstitutional court decisions, government grants, private-public partnerships, loan guarantees, etc.

Communism has been replaced in name only, by the so-called ‘green movement” where the neo-communists use junk science to predict a cataclysmic environmental crisis in order for the government to step in to control how and where you live in order to protect the environment.I call these neo-communists the ‘watermelon people’ because they are green on the outside and communist red to the core on the inside. Do not underestimate the danger these neo-communists pose to our way of life.

There is a worldwide network of these watermelon people who are prominent business people, socialist billionaires, environmentalists, academics, media moguls and corrupt politicians who are very much like the Lilliputians in Gulliver’s Travels. They are the neo-communists (new communists). Pushing the globalist agendas of Global Warming, Agenda 21 -Sustainable Development, Cap-and-Trade, social justice, world-wide financial reform and protection of the planet Earth, these individuals and non-governmental organizations are extremely well financed by socialist billionaires, large international banks and corporations and their tax-free foundations. With almost unlimited funding, they pose more of a danger to the American people’s freedoms, liberty and sovereignty than any foreign enemy.

This growing network of individuals and non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) have been using our country’s membership in the United Nations and other international organizations to circumvent the US Constitution by gradually expanding the role and power of these international organizations in an effort to diminish our own sovereignty. Using international trade and climate agreements, presidential executive orders and an ever increasing number of ‘green’regulations, the globalist enemies within our own country have crippled our manufacturing base and energy industry.They push to give non-elected international organizations ever increasing powers over the American people at the expense of our country’s sovereignty.

More recently, these globalist neo-communists have been advocating for the consolidation of international finances and money creating powers into a new world-wide banking system that would concentrate power into the hands of a few private international bankers, kind of like a global Federal Reserve Bank. All of this is proposed for the benefit of all mankind, of course.

The individual “threads of change” that America’s own traitorous Lilliputians use against their fellow Americans are varied and if examined individually would not appear to pose to any big danger to our way of life in America. But added together, these individual “threads of change” (presidential executive orders, laws, international agreements, ‘green’ regulations, etc) are placing American’s freedoms, liberty and sovereignty at risk. This is one reason that many Americans today feel that the American way of life is being attacked and challenged every single day from a hundred different directions and they are right.

Here are just a few of the “threads of change” currently being woven around America’s freedoms, liberties and sovereignty by these traitorous enemies within out own country:

a. Millions of dollars in “legal” special interest bribes to our politicians every year by lobbyists;

b. 20 million illegal aliens being allowed to remain in this country costing the American taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars;

c. Election fraud through the use of new, easily hacked electronic voting machines without paper trails;

d. Downplaying of the importance of English as our official language;

e. Destroying our manufacturing jobs through unfair trade agreements like NAFTA and CAFTA that benefit large international corporations over American workers;

f. Growing influence of private, non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) like the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission on our government’s political leaders and policies;

g. Failed social engineering programs in housing, education, finance, employment, etc.

h. Expansion of underfunded entitlement programs including the new Obamacare;

i. Ever increasing taxation of the people at every level of government;

j. Frequent attacks on the Second Amendment guaranteed rights of American citizens from every level of government;

k. Creation of one financial crises after another that are designed to allow the federal government and the Federal Reserve to assume a larger role in controlling the economy even though the federal government’s own actions, policies and legislation caused the crises in the first place;

l. Federal government’s use of the threat of terrorism as an excuse to become more intrusive into our everyday lives and thereby place more and more limitations on our personal freedoms and liberties;

m. Increasing use of prescription drugs to alter the behavior of more and more Americans. For example: At the present time, there are 6 million children under the age of 18 in the USA who have been prescribed mind-altering psychotropic drugs like Ritalin;

n. Deliberate “Dumbing Down” of the American education system through revised teaching methods and the re-writing of textbooks to include politically correct and globalist agendas that is“indoctrinating” our young people;

o. Deliberate and frequent attacks on mainstream organized religions (particularly Jewish and Christian

p. Surrender of our government’s constitutional power to create money to a group of private international bankers (the Federal Reserve) who answer to no one and who are slowly and deliberately bankrupting this country through the use of “fiat’ money;

q. Manipulated and biased news stories from the mainstream media that are too often designed to support the political agendas of their owners, international bankers and corporations, special interest groups and their favorite political candidates.

r. Politicization and manipulation of science by special interest groups for political gain through the use of legal and/or economic pressure to influence the findings of scientific research and then using their own media outlets to control the way it is disseminated, reported or interpreted. The Global Warming hoax is a prime example of this process;

s. The endless cycle of war that has occurred since America became a member of the United Nations. The UN charter has allowed our politicians to send American troops into combat on foreign soil without formal Declarations of War;

t. The step by step surrender of our nation’s sovereignty to an ever expanding and un-elected United Nations bureaucracy in order to promote the need for a “New World Order” and “One World Government” under the guise of fighting common global threats against all the people of the earth including the pollution of the oceans, the aids epidemic, third world poverty, terrorism and of course global warming;

Unfortunately, the previous list is only a small fraction of the thousands of “threads of change” that are being woven around and through American society today by America’s enemy within. Although this traitorous network of individuals and organizations is relatively small, they have an unlimited amount of money at their disposal to use to pursue their globalist agenda.

The long term plan of America’s neo-communist Lilliputians has been to use a small “step by step” progressive process, or a “thread by thread” change process that is designed to slowly but steadily advance their goals while at the same time going virtually unnoticed by the majority of Americans. Unfortunately, if these enemies within are successful in implementing their Communist Manifesto goals, America will be gradually converted from a sovereign nation into a subservient position in the New World Order run by non-elected, appointed bureaucrats selected by the neo-communist (neo-coms) billionaires, crooked politicians, special interest NGO’s and the international bankers.

The sheer numbers of these individual globalist “threads of change” that threaten America’s freedoms, liberty and sovereignty have been increasing dramatically in the last few decades. As these “threads of change” are very carefully woven deeper and deeper into the fabric of American society by the enemy within and are combined with other “threads of change,” they are steadily becoming stronger and shortly will be almost impossible to break.

If America fails to awaken soon to the danger that these traitorous American Lilliputians pose to this country, we too, like Lemuel Gulliver, will find ourselves totally incapacitated, without individual freedoms and liberty and unable to do anything about it. The grip of these international criminals andtraitors must be broken and the threats against our liberties, freedoms and our nation’s sovereignty must be eliminated before it is too late.

If the weaving of the “threads of change” by the enemy within is ultimately successful, the US constitution will gradually be superseded by international laws, rules, regulations and the legal decisions of an International World Court.

If we do nothing and the traitorous Lilliputian neo-communists are successful in fully implementing their globalist agenda for America, we will all be destined to be poor, overtaxed, unarmed, bound by the chains and shackles of servitude and at the mercy of our new masters, the global elite.

But we have a choice!

In 1776, our Founders stood up, put their lives and fortunes on the line and declared their freedom and independence from the chains and shackles of the King of England. In 2011, Americans must once again be willing to stand up and publicly declare their Freedom and Independence, not from the King of England, but from the chains and shackles of our own government and from those traitorous individuals and organizations who pull the strings of thepoliticians and the media like puppet masters from behind a curtain of secrecy, bribery and deception.

The fight for our freedoms and liberty must be intensified here and now. We must put aside those minor differences that have separated us in the past and unite as one strong political force to restore our Liberty now. We must recruit more freedom loving Americans into our ranks and grow our numbers by the millions.

The road ahead will not be easy and the traitorous enemies within our own country are very cunning, unscrupulous and have unlimited resources. But they are no match for an army of united and determined American citizens like us who are prepared to fight the hard battles that lie ahead, as our Founders did 235 years ago.

Let all true liberty groups and individual patriots in the country find a way to join together and coordinate their efforts in 2011 and 2012 to continue the journey that will leave future generations of Americans a legacy of individual freedom and liberty, a first class education system, a clean environment, a strong and sovereign America with an honest, limited government that will offer unlimited opportunities for their future.

Let there be no doubt about the outcome of this fight because a strong-willed, united force of freedom loving American citizens will prevail against tyranny!

ARE YOU WITH ME?

2011-09-30T09:48:00.000-07:00

America was founded by people who came to this land in search of Liberty and opportunity. When an oppressive government began to restrict their Liberty in the 1770s, they hardened their resolve, took an oath to stand together and risked everything for the cause of Liberty. They ultimately won their independence and succeeded in breaking the chains and shackles of servitude to the King of England.

Those brave men and women understood that our rights come from our Creator, not from any government, and that our rights are UNALIENABLE – and cannot be taken away or diminished in any way by any government.

That’s why the constitution was written very carefully by the Founders who established a Republic to protect our UNALIENABLE RIGHTS.

The United States Constitution doesn’t contain thousands of pages of meaningless legal jargon, like most of the federal legislation written today, but rather it was written so that every American could easily understand it. It clearly limits the power of the federal government by only giving it very specific, enumerated powers. All other powers are reserved to the States and to the People.

Over the last 100 years or so, under both Republican and Democratic administrations, our federal government has gradually increased its powers beyond its Constitutional limitations, while our individual freedoms are gradually being lost to this ever growing and more intrusive government.

We are living in a country vastly different than the one many of us grew up in and one that has become almost foreign to us in many ways. America has become a country where our common language, core principles and shared beliefs have been unconstitutionally tossed aside by the socialists and globalists in our federal government and by radical activist judges who continually show their disdain for the will of the American people.

Our federal government has created new rights for a wide variety of special interest groups, encouraged a culture of dependency, all in the name of Fairness, Tolerance and Political Correctness, while at the same time, they are intolerant of us and call us tea baggers, truthers, birthers Fascists, Nazis and Racists because we dare to disagree with their socialist agenda and redistribution of our wealth.

There is only one way to bring our federal government back to its original foundation and limitation, and that is to make the federal government ‘OBEY THE CONSTITUTION.”

What is particularly troubling is the fact that at a time when our country continues to be invaded by millions of illegal aliens, and many of our states, particularly our border states, are struggling to survive under this invasion, the current President of the United States, for the first time in our history, is siding with the foreign invaders against our own citizens.

Rather than helping the states fight this invasion, the current administration puts up billboard-size signs warning American citizens to stay out of the desert in their own country because of the dangers posed by violent foreign drug smugglers other criminals who cross our border at will. Rather than live up to his oath to protect the American people, our president violates his oath and chooses to stand side by side with socialist organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union and LaRaza to defend and protect the illegal alien invaders and the Mexican drug cartels, all at the expense of the American people, particularly in the border states. My fellow citizens, this is the very defifition of Tyranny.

Our own federal government is slowly but surely becoming the enemy of its own citizens because our elected officials and federal judges are completely disregarding the oaths they took to protect and defend the constitution.

I am a member of an organization called the OathKeepers. It is a national organization comprised of active duty and former members of the military and law enforcement who have sworn to honor their oaths to support and defend the US Constitution. We pledge our lives and our sacred honor in the defense of Liberty and the Republic and Our motto is: NOT ON OUR WATCH!.”

That means that we will never stand on the sidelines as our Liberty is under attack, NOT TODAY, NOT TOMORROW, NOT NEXT WEEK, NEVER.

Those of us who have taken this oath at one or more times in our lives, have sworn to continue to stand by that oath to support and defend the Constitution.

THE OATH KEEPERS STAND FOR FREEDOM:

We stand for: FREEDOM from the invasion of illegal aliens.

We stand for FREEDOM from cap and trade legislation, and the bailout of international banks, wall street, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Global Warming Scam, the Green Jobs scam and stimulus handouts to political donors and cronys.

We stand for FREEDOM from the collection of racial, ethnic and other data on Americans that is used to divide and separate us into groups of hypheniated Americans. I am not a white American, a black American, an Irish-American or a Latino-American. I AM AN AMERICAN.

We stand for FREEDOM from thye increasing attacks on family farm, ranches and small businesses.

We stand for FREEDOM from the destructive international so-called free trade agreements like NAFTA and CAFTA that continue to destroy our manufacturing industry and cost millions of Americans their jobs.

We stand for FREEDOM from the endless cycle of war and the invasion of other countries without legitimate reasons and without the constitutionally required Declaration of Wa, all for the financial benefit of the military industrial complex.

We stand for FREEDOM from the United Nations, a communist Trojan Horse that is attacking our individual freedoms and our nation sovereignty like a cancer. Not only must the USA get out of the United Nations, but its time to kick the United nations out of the USA

We stand for FREEDOM from the enemies within our own country who push for a socialist 'New World Order' run by crooked politicians, socialist Billionaires and their non-governmental organizations, international bankers and international corporations.

We stand for FREEDOM from a government controlled HealthCare system and mandatory vaccinations.

We stand for FREEDOM from the incesant attacks on our Second Amendment guaranteed rights to possess firearms to defend ourselves.

We stand for FREEDOM from a government controlled education system that is not only in the process of re-writing our history, but from a system that has been dumbed down by design and is more about indoctrinating our children than educating them.

We stand for FREEDOM from the drugging of 6 million of our children every day for the benefit of the pharmaceutical industry.

Let us remember that at critical times in the 235 YEAR history of this great country, certain generations of Americans have been called upon to defend Liberty in its maximum hour of danger. In 1776, our Founders' generation was given that honor and privilege as were the generations of Americans who lived through World War I and World War II.

At these and other critical times in our history, brave Americans have taken an oath and stood as one united force against foreign aggressors and our Liberty was preserved. Today in America, our Liberty is once again under attack. This time, however, the attack is not coming from some foreign power, but rather it is coming from an enemy within; from our own federal government and from those traitorous individuals and special interest groups, who pull the strings of the politicians and the media, like puppet masters from behind a curtain of secrecy, bribery and deception.

Make no mistake; the danger to our Liberty is as real today as it was in 1776, 1917 and 1941.

Our Founders repeatedly warned us of the dangers that a free America would face in the future and that the most serious danger to our Liberty would come from within. They also told us that it is not only an honor and a privilege to defend our Liberty, but that it is also our sacred duty to do so, not just for ourselves but for our children and our children's children.

Just as those brave generations of Americans have done before us, OUR generation must be prepared to stand up, take the oath and join together as one united force to defend Liberty in America.

This is a critical time in our country’s history because our Liberty is once again in mortal danger and it must be defended now!. WE are now the generation that must act and this is OUR time to Stand Up and be counted! If we join together in 2011 and 2012 as one united force to defend Liberty, we can take America back!

ARE YOU WITH ME?

THE CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS: NOW WE KNOW WHO THE REAL RACISTS ARE!

2011-09-03T08:20:00.001-07:00

Some members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) have been are traveling around this great country, at taxpayers’ expense of course, meeting with members of their communities in town hall style meetings hurling vile and false racist charges not only against their fellow white members of Congress, but at anyone associated with the Tea Party movement, particularly if they happen to be White. Apparently, these members of the Congressional Black Caucus feel that anyone who is White, in the Tea Party movement and is standing up for the constitution and/or who wants a smaller federal government with less spending, is an anti-Black racist.

At one of these recent CBC Town Hall meetings, Representative Andre Carson (D-Indiana), said that some (White) members of Congress want to go back 50 or 60 years with regard to race relations. He said “Some of these (white) folks in Congress right now would love to see us (blacks) as second class citizens and some of them in Congress right now with the Tea Party movement would love to see you and me hanging on a tree.”

Of course, Andre Carson has never really had anything of substance to say during his unremarkable congressional career, so what the hell, why not just accuse Whites of racism and put the race card on the table. Remember back in March of 2010, when Representative Andre Carson, the NAACP, along with Congressmen John Lewis and Emanuel Cleaver made complaints that a mob of White Tea Party protestors had spit on them and called them “niggers” in front of the Cannon House federal building during the health care debate. Unfortunately for them, someone recorded the entire incident and the allegations were proven to be absolutely false. The congressmen and the NAACP representatives had made up the whole thing to show that they were the “victims” of White racism. These congressmen outright lied and it was caught on tape. Who were the real racists back then?

As far as the lynching of people is concerned, Representative Carson is apparently ignorant of the fact that it was not just Blacks who were lynched by the KKK and by members of his own party, the southern Democrats. After the Civil War, the Democrats in the south called Republicans “radicals” because the Republican Party had become a bi-racial party that actually allowed Blacks to vote and participate in the political process. For example, in the South Carolina of 1868, the Republicans in the state legislature were made up of 50 Blacks and only 13 Whites, while the Democrats were all White. Out of the 4,800 people that were lynched during the next 90 years or so, 1,300 of those lynched were White, mostly Republicans who were lynched because they supported Black civil rights. With this history, it boggles the mind that Blacks would remain so loyal to the Democrat party.

What exactly is the Congressional Black Caucus? Can White people be admitted or is it a Blacks-only racially-exclusive group? And if it is a racially-exclusive group, how can such a “Blacks-only” group that discriminates against White people in membership, even exist within a federal government organization that is paid for by taxpayer dollars? Here are the answers that may surprise you.

The Congressional Black Caucus was founded in 1971 by 13 Black members of congress and in its 40 or so-years of existence it has never allowed a White Congressman, Congresswoman or Senator to become a member. This ”No Whites” policy of the Congressional Black Caucus was tested back in 2007 by a newly elected House member, Stephen I. Cohen of Tennessee, a White man who represented a 60 percent Black district. During Cohen’s 2006 campaign he was quoted as saying that if elected he would try to become "the first White member" of the Congressional Black Caucus. Shortly after being sworn in on January 2007, however, Cohen’s bid for membership was turned down and he heard from several Black Congressional Caucus members that “whites need not apply.” Who were the real racists here?

At the time, Congressional Black Caucus member William Lacy Clay (D-Missouri), son of one of the CBC’s founders, confirmed that. "Mr. Cohen asked for admission, and he got his answer. … It’s time to move on. It’s an unwritten rule. It’s understood. It’s clear" that White people cannot become members of the Black caucus. Rep Clay went on to say:

“Quite simply, Rep. Cohen will have to accept what the rest of the country will have to accept – there has been an unofficial Congressional White Caucus for over 200 years, and now it’s our turn to say who can join ‘the club.’ He does not, and cannot, meet the membership criteria, unless he can change his skin color. Primarily, we are concerned with the needs and concerns of the black population, and we will not allow white America to infringe on those objectives.”

Who are the real racists here?

For approximately 40 years, White people have been denied membership in a federal government funded congressional organization just because of the color of their skin. Isn’t this a violation of federal anti-discrimination laws? The American taxpayers, of all races and creeds, pay the salaries of the congressional staff members, as well as the congressional office expenses that are used to support this apparently racist Black organization.

The main question here is how can such racial discrimination against White congressional members exist in the United States in 2011? Can you imagine the uproar if there was a White Congressional Caucus and they had refused to allow a Black member of congress to become a member because of the color of his or her skin. Oh! Wait a minute. I forgot. You can’t have a White Congressional Caucus because that would be considered racist!

Let’s take a quick look at the recent remarks of some members of the Congressional Black Caucus and see what this traveling band of racists instigators have been saying:

Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-California) was caught on tape saying that “the Tea Party can go straight to hell” and called for mass demonstrations by Blacks including runs on the banks and civil unrest not only in their neighborhoods but in the neighborhoods of White people as well. These are pretty strong words from a woman who is under investigation for misusing her congressional office to help her husband’s Black-owned bank get some TARP and Stimulus funds. Who is the real racist here?

Rep. Frederica Wilson (D-Florida) said: “High unemployment in the black community is a result of White racism. When you look at African American males, 40% of them are unemployed, those under 30 years of age. And all of the growth in the past 30 years, we see it.” She conveniently ignored the fact that the Democrat party had controlled congress from 2007 to 2010, and had done a great job of creating more government programs that destroyed the economy, along with a lot of help from President Obama.

Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Florida) said “the Tea Party is the Republican Party” and later urged the panel to play down the power of the tea party. “I’m not going to continue down the path of giving them all this credit,” “Turn the tea party upside down!” he said. This coming from a man whose congressional career began after he was impeached from his Judgeship for taking a bribe of $150,000.

Joining the members of the Congressional Black Caucus at one of their recent town hall meetings was the Reverend, Jesse Jackson of “Hymie-Town” fame, who also made some outrageous charges that White Tea Partiers were the ones opposing the civil rights movement led by Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. “The tea party is a new name on an old game,” he said. “Dr. King fought a ‘tea party’ in Alabama…He had no weapons, but he confronted the tea party.”

Of course there was no tea party movement in Alabama when Dr King was alive, but Jesse Jackson, like his friend Al Sharpton, is not restricted by the facts. There is nothing like a phony, charlatan, opportunist preacher bearing false witness and trying to divide Americans by using that worn out old race card. But that is nothing new for Reverend “Hymie-Town” is it? Who is the real racist here?

I believe the Rev. Jackson also needs a lesson in history. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a registered Republican. Why? Because from its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party, the Republican Party has been the party that has championed freedom and civil rights for Black people, not the Democrat party. The Democrat party is, as it always has been, the party of Slavery, Segregation, Secession and now Socialism.

It was the Democrats who fought to keep blacks in slavery and passed the discriminatory Black Codes and the Jim Crow laws that Representative Andre Carson talked about, not the Republicans.

It was the Democrats who started and supported the Ku Klux Klan and it was the Democrats who were involved in the lynching and terrorizing of Blacks, not the Republicans.

The Democrat party has fought tooth and nail for most of their history to prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860's, and they continued fighting the civil rights legislation into the 1950's and 1960's. Remember Senator Robert Byrd, the famous Democrat Senator from North Carolina who at one time was a Grand Cyclops in his local Klux Klux Klan chapter.

What some of the members of the CBC seem to forget is that the tea party movement is made up of people from all races, ethnic backgrounds and political beliefs. What should bother most Americans, both Black and White, is that it appears that out of the 43 members of the Congressional Black Caucus, only one member has the guts to stand up and speak against the racist remarks made some of its members.

If a White member of congress said that the failing economy was caused by the actions of racist Black members of congress, White congressmen and women would be stepping over each other to express their outrage. Where is the outrage about these comments from the Black members of congress or President Obama? Why do they remain silent? Are they afraid to criticize a fellow Black politician because they would be called an Uncle Tom?

Fortunately, Black members of the Tea party movement are standing up to be counted and are coming out against the remarks made by the CBC members. Rep. Allen West, the no-nonsense GOP congressman from Florida and the only Republican member of the Congressional Black Caucus, said he might even consider leaving the CBC after hearing the vitriolic, anti-White, anti-Tea Party language.

Emery McClendon, an African-American from Fort Wayne, Indiana, who is among the most popular speakers at tea party events both in Indiana and nationally, said Carson and some of the other members of the CBC should apologize. “I’m the one who started the tea party here in Allen County,” McClendon said. “I have never in my career, and it’s been almost three years now that the tea party’s been in existence, experienced any form of racism or any form of any negative-type treatment from anybody. The negative treatment that I have received has been from basically my own people, other blacks, telling me that I’m wrong for being a part of it, but without having any type of reasoning or proof as to why I shouldn’t be a part of the Tea Party.”

I wonder if the Democrat Party leadership, as part of their demented Election 2012 strategy, has given the green light to some Black Caucus members to hit the streets with their baseless, racist allegations against White people, while also calling for protest and resistance against the Tea Party movement. Is this what the Congressional Black Caucus is supposed to be about? Are certain CBC members deliberately trying to divide America along racial lines in the hopes that all hell breaks loose before the 2012 elections?

Is this where these new Black “Flash Mobs” are getting their ideas from? As you may or may not know, violent Black ‘Flash Mobs’ have randomly and viciously attacked White people in several major cities and other locations throughout the country during 2011, with little or no national news attention given to these incidents. If there were violent White ‘Flash Mobs’ randomly and viciously attacking Black people throughout the country, it would surely have made the national news. Are these Black ‘Flash Mobs’ getting their ideas to hate White people from certain members of the Black Congressional Caucus?

The vitriolic, anti-White, anti-Tea Party rhetoric coming from some members of the Congressional Black Caucus is right out of Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals.” Demonize the White members of congress and the Tea Party. Create a climate of fear, distrust and racial animosity that might lead to civil unrest, violence, rioting, racial hatred, and destruction so severe, that President Obama and the federal government will have to intervene in the name of national security, peace and order, and we will all suffer from a loss of our freedoms and perhaps our very liberty.

The racist leaning members of the Congressional Black Caucus, as well as their Marxist friends and fellow travelers in our government, are keenly aware that the majority of Americans of every race and creed are waking up to what is happening in America. The people are becoming aware that they are being used as pawns by those in power and by those who seek power. The American people are beginning to find out about the globalist and socialist plans for America and they don’t like what they see and hear, so some members of the Congressional Black Caucus and similar race-based organizations must now ratchet it up a notch or two.

Playing the race card is what these racist individuals always do when all other options run out. They haven’t been able to keep up the deception of the American people and a growing number of Americans, including an increasing number of Black Americans, are now resisting their socialist plans for the country. Apparently, it is now time for certain Black leaders to declare war on those outspoken, White racists and to try to shut their mouths once and for all by calling them racists. Calling White people ‘racists’ has always worked in the past, but as the members of the CBC will soon find out: “that old dog don’t hunt no more” and by their own words and actions, we now know who the real racists are!

With the help of an increasing number of well-informed and courageous Black Americans who are now willing to speak out against the racial agenda-driven, establishment Black political leaders, America will be better able to move forward as one strong, freedom-loving movement without separating ourselves into different hyphenated racial groups.

Together, Americans from all races and creeds will continue on our journey to restore our Republic and leave future generations of Americans a legacy of individual freedom and liberty, a first class, non-government run education system, a clean environment, a strong and sovereign America with an honest, limited, constitutional government that will offer unlimited opportunities for their future.

JOHN WALLACE INTERNET RADIO - WEDNESDAY AT 8PM (NEW YORK TIME - USA)

2011-08-23T21:29:00.000-07:00

This week I will be talking about the new proposed Safe Haven Project designed to create strong, independent communities of Liberty minded individuals that will be able to weather the coming American economic crash; China's plans for Cyber-attacks against the USA leaked by mistake; Immigration overload in America; How did Americans get so clueless about world events and their own government?; Who has been getting money from the Federal Reserve?; Obama's plan to discriminate against White people in federal employment; Obama implementation of the 'Law of the Sea treaty' by executive order; the first Republican presidential candidate to bring up the issue of illegal immigration; Obama's plan to reduce deportations of illegal aliens giving them de facto Amnesty; and more!

As always, listeners are encouraged to call in and you can listen to the show on the telephone while you are waiting to speak with me.

SHOW LIVE CALL IN TEL NUMBER: 646-200-0326

Click on the link below for more information about the show and/or to listen to the show:

www.BlogTalkRadio.com/JohnWallace

For Liberty,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com

Please visit our online Liberty newspaper at:
www.LibertyNewsOnLine.com

THE TEA PARTY MESSAGE TO THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS: WE ARE COMING FOR YOU!

2011-08-09T09:25:00.000-07:00

The Democrat-Socialists in Washington have been stepping over each other trying to get in front of the TV cameras to call Tea Party members terrorists and mean-spirited, right-wing extremists. What the Democrat-Socialists fail to recognize is that the Tea Party is made up of a cross section of the America people whose growing numbers are fed up with big government, high taxes, incompetent leadership and out of control government spending.

During the recent battle over whether or not to raise the nation’s borrowing limit, those Republican lawmakers connected with the tea party were targeted for special attacks and ridicule as they pushed hard for "real" spending cuts with no tax increases. Rep. Mike Doyle, a Pennsylvania Democrat-Socialist, complained to Vice President Joseph R. Biden in a closed meeting of House Democrat-Socialists that the tea party-allied lawmakers “have made it impossible to spend any money” and “We have negotiated with terrorists.”

Remember when members of the Democrat-Socialist party denounced conservatives such as Sarah Palin for using gun target imagery in the wake of the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D) Arizona. Well, when it comes to the Tea Party, these same "holier than thou" socialists have not hesitated to use even stronger language in the debt ceiling debate.

While debating the possible inclusion of a Balanced Budget amendment to the Constitution into proposed legislation, which was supported by tea party groups, Rep. Mel Watt, NC Democrat-Socialist said that this kind of legislation: “literally holds a gun to the head of the economy of the United States of America.”

House Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer, MD Democrat-Socialist, spoke of “Russian roulette” with loaded chambers, and how House Republicans, backed by the Tea party, “want to shoot every bullet they have at the president.”

Former Obama administration economist Steven "the Rat" Rattner, called the Republicans and their tea party supporters terrorists when he said "I imagine these tea party guys are like strapped with dynamite standing in the middle of Times Square at rush hour and saying, ‘Either you do it my way, or we are going to blow you up, ourselves up and the whole country up with us."

I firmly believe that the American people can see through all of the Democratic-Socialist playbook rhetoric and find it not onlly very offensive, but just plain stupid.
The Democratic-Socialist party and their active supporters in the government-media complex are making a big mistake attacking the Tea party and it will eventually backfire on them.

Attacking such a large number of average American citizens, who have decided to take a stand and speak up for their beliefs, by calling them terrorists and other vile names is unprecedented in American politics. Calling them terrorists because they want a smaller federal government as outlined in the Constitution, less government regulations and control, a secure border, less taxes, less spending and more freedom as free American citizens shows how desperate the Democratic-Socialists have become to keep their socialist programs and how out of touch they are with the American people.

The Democratic-Socialists currently in power in Washington DC fully understand that the growing Tea Party movement in America is starting to change the status quo and they don't like it because they are scared. The enemies within our own country, including the socialist billionaires and the anti-American marxists and racist groups they fund, don't like it because they are scared. The other anti-American socialists groups within our country who are constantly assaulting our educational system, our religious beliefs, our capitalist economic system and our Military in the hopes of creating a "New World Order," don't like it because they too are scared. To all these enemies within I say you have a right to be scared, because the American people are coming for you.

Rep. Steve King, Iowa Republican and a member of the House Tea Party Caucus, said the Democratic-Socialists are tossing around words like “terrorist” because they’ve lost the policy debate. “It’s the last refuge of those who don’t have an argument left,” Mr. King said in an interview. “It tells me that the tea parties have been effective. We wouldn’t even be having this debate if it weren’t for the tea parties.”

The people of America are beginning to understand that the Constitution cannot defend itself. It is the duty of the People to defend it and that is what the Tea Party movement in America is all about. The American people ae coming together to demand a return to constitutional, limited government. We are the cooks, bakers, police officers, fire fighters, accountants, housewives, retirees, real estate agents, cherks, retail workers, truck drivers, construction workers, and millions of other everyday Americans who are fed up with what is happening to this great country.

Our country's Founders told us that "Governments get their just powers from the consent of the governed and whenever the government becomes destructive of these ends, it is not only the people's Right, but it is their sacred Duty to change the government." The Tea Party movement is growing because our federal government is out of control. As each day passes, it becomes more intrusive into our daily lives and more destructive of our individual freedoms

Thomas Jefferson said: "When the people fear their government, there is Tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is Liberty!"

Together, let us begin a journey to restore our Republic that will leave future generations of Americans a legacy of individual freedom and liberty, a first class, non-government run education system, a clean environment, a strong and sovereign America with an honest, limited, constitutional government that will offer unlimited opportunities for their future.

If we stand together and act now, we can give it to them.

By: John Wallace
www.TeaPartyRep.com

JOHN WALLACE RADIO: IS THERE A DICTATOR RISING IN AMERICA?

2011-07-12T18:31:00.000-07:00

NEXT SHOW: WEDNESDAY - JULY 13th at 8:00pm

IS THERE A DICTATOR RISING IN AMERICA?

This week I will be talking about how President Obama and his administration are increasingly disregarding Congress and the U.S. Constitution; the Debt Ceiling crisis; how he committed Treason and endangered our security by ending our space program and effctively giving the Russians control of space; we will ask why stimulus money was authorized to print 8,000 anti-white "social justice" manuals for the Omaha School District; the United Nations is looking to revive the Global Tax program; more info on Obama's birth record - now being called "Certifigate"; Political Correctness gone wild at 911 Memorial in NYC; growing Black Flash-Mob violence against white people going unreported in the media; France's turn to the right when it comes to unchecked immigration, and more.

As always, listeners are encouraged to call in.
SHOW LIVE CALL IN NUMBER: 646-200-0326

If you would rather not talk on the show, you can also go to the
show's Chat Room and text your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.

Click on the link below for more information about the show and/or to listen to the show:

www.BlogTalkRadio.com/JohnWallace

For Liberty,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com

Please visit our online Liberty newspaper at:
www.LibertyNewsOnLine.com

WHY IS CHINA MAKING PARTS FOR OUR MILITARY EQUIPMENT?

2011-06-18T08:35:00.000-07:00

Senators Levin and McCain rcently warned of Counterfeit Electronic Defense Parts being made in China and they are calling on China to assist in an Investigation, but China is stonewalling their efforts. With friends like China, we don't need enemies.

I have a better question for the two Senators and for the American people:

Why the hell is China making parts for our military planes in the first place? They are not our friends.

Republican and Democratic members of the Senate Armed Services Committee say it suspects counterfeit electronic parts, made in China, are infiltrating U.S. military weapons systems and they have called on the Chinese government to allow committee staffers into the country to investigate. Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Carl Levin, D-Mich., say it is vitally important to U.S. interests to rid American systems of the parts.

I say its vitally important to U.S. interests to rid our military aircraft and weapons systems of any Chinese-made parts. What the hell is wrong with our elected and appointed officials in our federal government?

"Counterfeit electronic parts pose a risk to our national security, pose a risk to the reliability of our weapons systems and pose a risk to the safety of our military men and women," Senator Levin said. He added that many at the Pentagon and within its contractors believe the threat comes from China.

Do you really think so Senator? What took you so long?

"In January of 2010, the U.S. Commerce Department published the results of a survey of almost 400 companies and organizations in the Department of Defense's supply chain," Levin said. "Those surveyed overwhelmingly cited China as the country suspected of being the source of counterfeit electronic parts."

The answer seems simple enough. Don't allow any Chinese made parts to be used in any of our military equipment. Don't allow any manufactuires that make parts for our military to use any Chinese-made parts at all.

Senators Levin and McCain complain that China is refusing to work with committee staff who are trying to enter the country to further investigate the issue. Their offices continue to ask for visas but China has thus far refused them.

What a great friend China is to America!

"The U.S. and China are not destined to be adversaries," McCain said. "We have overlapping interests, and this is one of them. It should be in Chinese interests not to have counterfeiting of these electronic parts going on because it would harm legitimate Chinese companies as well."

What about harming members of our military Senator? Who cares what happens to the Chinese companies.

But McCain added the counterfeit parts are first and foremost a problem for the U.S. military. "If the electronic parts that go into our weapons systems are counterfeited, there is every possibility that those counterfeiters could cripple our ability to have those systems work in fashion for which they were designed," he said.

There is always the possibility that the conterfeit parts have been manufactured on purpose and I wouldn't put it oassed the Chinese to put chips in some of these parts so they will malfunction if we ever meet in combat situations. nThey cannot be trusted. They are a communist country.

I'll ask the question again: Why the hell is China making parts for our military planes in the first place? They are not our friends. THEY ARE LOOKING TO DESTROY US!

Congress must launch an investigation to identify the idiot(s) or traitor(s) who authorized such a foolish and dangerous thing?

Why are any parts of our military weapons systems subcontracted out to China who is our enemy?

Is anyone in Washington concerned about our national security, or is it just a group of very rich traitors looking to make a lot of money at the expense of our national security and the safety of our military personnel?

I guess we will have to follow the money to find out.

John Wallace
www.NYOathKeeper.com

JOHN WALLACE RADIO: WEDNESDAY AT 8:00pm EST

2011-06-07T19:45:00.000-07:00

NEXT SHOW: WEDNESDAY - JUNE 8th at 8:00pm

This week I will be talking about the proposal to put edible RFID tracking chips in our food; more dangers identified in the new green CFL lightbulbs; the Presidential candidates; WeinerGate; the failure of Keynesian Economics; some good news in the fight against Illegal Immigration; is there any gold in Fort Knox?; George Soros and his push for government control of the internet; is Obama's new Birth certificate a forgery?; Smart electric and gas meters in your homes for contriol; Barney Frank's friends with benefits; and more.

As always, listeners are encouraged to call in.
SHOW LIVE CALL IN NUMBER: 646-200-0326

If you would rather not talk on the show, you can also go to the show's Chat Room and text your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.

Click on the link below for more information about the show and/or to listen to the show:

www.BlogTalkRadio.com/JohnWallace

For Liberty,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com

Please visit our online Liberty newspaper at:
www.LibertyNewsOnLine.com

JOHN WALLACE RADIO: THE NEO-CONS BETRAYAL OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

2011-04-26T18:14:00.003-07:00

ON THE AIR: WEDNESDAY - APRIL 27TH at 8:00pm EST

TOPIC: NEO-CONS AND THEIR BETRAYAL OF THE CONSTITUTION

My Guest this week is Mr. John F. McManus, an author of numerous books and articles, and the the publisher of the New American Magazine. He is also the President of the John Birch Society. His clearly writen and spoken words have helped many Americans to understand and combat our nation's slide towards tyranny. He will be talking about the Neo-Conservative agenda, including their attempt to derail the Tea Party movement and it political successes. Topics to be covered:

What is neoconservativism and who were its founders?
Are the neoconservatives really big government globalists in disguise?
Does the background of neoconservatism reveal its leftst roots?
What media outlets present the neoconservative message?
What neoconservatives are part of the Globalist - Council on Foreign Relations?
Who are the likely neoconservative Presidential candidates for 2012? and
How should liberty-minded patriots properly define themselves?

As always, listeners are encouraged to call in.
LIVE CALL IN NUMBER: (646-200-0326)

If you would rather not talk on the show, you can also go to the show's Chat Room and text your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.

Click on the link below for more information about the show and/or to listen to the show:

www.BlogTalkRadio.com/JohnWallace

For Liberty,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com

GOING TO WAR: THE US CONSTITUTION vs THE UNITED NATIONS

2011-03-26T07:52:00.000-07:00

It seems that since the end of World War II, the United States has been in an almost continuous state of war without a formal Declaration of War having been passed by Congress. Our political leaders from both political parties have been using a loophole called the United Nations to circumvent our Constitution and send our young men and women into combat. Our current president, Barack Obama, has taken it a step further in disregarding the constitution by not even consulting with congress before he committed the American military to yet another unconstitutional attack on a foreign country.

This is no coincidence since the United Nations Charter was authored by a Rockefeller aide and globalist named Alger Hiss, who was later convicted of being a communist spy for Russia. Circumventing the sovereignty of individual nations has been the globalistâ€™s plan all along and the United Nations has been the change agent for this plan.

When all presidents are sworn in, they take an oath of office to â€œ...preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.â€ Perhaps they should take an oath to obey the Constitution. The U.S. Constitution clearly states that only Congress has the power to declare war, and to make all the laws necessary to engage in military conflict. The War Powers Resolution subsequently passed by congress defines precisely what is required of the President before military action can begin, but even by those loose standards, the President still has no constitutional authority to commit the American military to engage in hostilities if we have not been attacked.

If President Obama wanted to involve the American military in the internal matters of Libya or any other country, he is required by the U.S. Constitution to make his case before Congress and put it to a vote.

Several times before the attack on Libya, Mr. Obama issued conflicting statements on the necessity for military invention and whether or not there should be a no-fly zone established over Libya to protect civilians. At no time did he contact congress concerning the issue. I believe that Mr. Obamaâ€™s flip-flopping and indecisiveness must be viewed in the context of his overall desire to change America's approach to international affairs from one of unilateral decisions being made by a sovereign nation, to some sort of radical, deferential, globalist approach that cedes our sovereign decisions to the United Nations and other equally corrupt international bodies.

When the United Nations Security Council approved the resolution authorizing the use of force against the Libyan government, our president ordered the U.S. Military into action almost immediately without the knowledge or approval of Congress. It is a dangerous situation when only one person, even if he is the President of the United States, uses the authority of the United Nations to wage undeclared war without the consent of the Congress of the United States. His actions cannot go unchallenged or there will be no limitations on his power.

Mr. Obamaâ€™s actions should be of great concern to all American for they clearly show that Mr. Obama refuses to accept the limitations placed on our federal government and the office of the President by the Constitution and that he apparently considers the United Nations to be a higher authority than Congress and the sovereignty of the United States.

Where is the so-called conservative Republican leadership on the issue? There doesnâ€™t seem to be any outrage about the unconstitutional attack on another country or any demand that President Obama obey the Constitution.

For example: In a statement released after the U.S. military assault on Libya had begun, John Boehner, Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives, said it was â€œunacceptable and outrageous for Gaddafi to attack his own people, and the violence must stop,â€ but Mr. Boehner never once mentioned Obamaâ€™s unconstitutional decision to take action against Libya without consulting Congress. What about the Constitution Mr. Boehner?

In the Senate, Republican Senator John McCain also did the two-step around the constitutional issues and instead criticized President Obama for not moving quickly enough in his UN-permitted action against the Libyan dictator. â€œHe waited too long, there is no doubt in my mind about it,â€ said McCain who seems to have missed the point that the President has a constitutional obligation to go to the Congress before committing the American military to attack another country.

Bombing Libya, killing members of their military and creating a no-fly zone is an act of war. What would we do if another country or countries (with United Nations approval) created a no-fly zone over the United States and shot a few missiles into our country?

The United Nations has been granted no legal authority over the American people or our government because the UN does not derive its powers from the consent of the American people. Americans need to stop thinking that the United Nations has some legitimate, legal authority over our country. It does not! Americans have a choice. We can follow the U.S. Constitution and protect our freedoms, liberties and sovereignty, or we can continue to contribute billions of dollars to a bottomless pit and submit to the unconstitutional interference by the United Nations in our countryâ€™s and other countryâ€™s internal affairs.

Perhaps, the time has finally come for Americans to rethink the value of our membership and participation in the United Nations. The evidence is clear. Not only should we get out of the United Nations, but maybe it is also time for the United Nations to get out of the United States as well.

Global governance and the New World Order are growing stronger under our current President. When high ranking government officials from only a few nations can meet with representatives from the United Nations and issue an order for the bombing of a sovereign nation, using U.S. military assets, without Congressional approval, this ladies and gentlemen is global governance by the New World Order using the United Nations as a tool of control.

This end run around the Constitution by President Barack Obama must be rejected and our American national sovereignty must be reaffirmed as the only legitimate authority that governs the citizens of the United States.

The Congress of the United States has the duty and responsibility to make Barack Obama obey the Constitution and to limit his powers based on the Constitution. He is slowly becoming a dictator because as president, he has refused to enforce laws that he disagrees with; he has refused to abide by court decisions that he disagrees with and now he refuses to obey the Constitution that he has sworn to uphold.

Mr. Obama must be held accountable for his actions and Congress must act immediately. If members of both houses of Congress do not do their job in 2011, many of them wonâ€™t be around after the election of 2012, that is, if our Republic survives that long.

Link to Article on LibertyNews:
http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_30373.php

By John W. Wallace
www.NYOathKeeper.com

JOHN WALLACE RADIO ON FRIDAY AT 5:00PM EST: SHOULD WE BAN MUSLIM IMMIGRATION INTO THE USA?

2011-03-17T12:52:00.000-07:00

NEXT SHOW IS: THIS FRIDAY - MARCH 18TH AT 5:00PM EST

TOPIC: SHOULD WE BAN MUSLIM IMMIGRATION INTO THE USA?

Sometimes I cover topics that no one else will touch and this week is one of them. My guest this week is Mr. Frosty Wooldridge, the author of "America on the Brink: The Next Added 100 Million Americans." We will talk about whether there is a growing Muslim threat throughout the United States and the world and whether or not it is time for rational Western countries to enact an all-out ban on Muslim immigration. It’s proved disastrous in all of Europe where Muslims migrated. Why? Because recent history has shown that Muslims do not assimilate or acculturate into host countries. Rather, they become antagonistic, regressive and violent. According to Mr. Wooldridge and several other authors, a ban on Muslim immigration into the USA is not only constitutional, but "a practical and necessary way to defend ourselves against the growing threat of homegrown terrorism the U.S. faces in the 21st Century.” We will also talk about illegal aliens and other immigration issues.

As always, listeners are encouraged to call in.

If you would rather not talk on the show, you can also go to the show's Chat Room and text your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.

SHOW LIVE CALL IN NUMBER: (646-200-0326)

Click on the link below for more information about the show and/or to listen to the show:

www.BlogTalkRadio.com/JohnWallace

For Liberty,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
American Politics with John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com

Please vist our Liberty newspaper at:
www.LibertyNewsOnLine.com

JOHN WALLACE RADIO THIS FRIDAY - AGENDA: GRINDING AMERICA DOWN

2011-02-10T14:18:00.000-08:00

JOHN WALLACE RADIO

(THIS FRIDAY) Feb 11th at 5:00PM EST

TOPIC: AGENDA: GRINDING AMERICA DOWN

This week my guest is Mr. Curtis J. Bowers, a former Idaho legislator and producer of the film 'Agenda: Grinding America Down' in which he clearly shows that the socialist activists in American are following a very specific and public communist agenda to destroy the America we know. Just ask almost anyone you know and you'll hear "Communism is dead!" and "The Berlin Wall came down!" but Curtis Bowers clearly shows that although the word communism is not openly used anymore, the ideas behind it are alive and well and being followed by groups you would never suspect. Listen to this show for a fascinating look at the people and groups that have successfully targeted America's morality and Liberty in their effort to grind America down to a government controlled socialist/communist state, all for your own good of course. As always, people are encouraged to call in during the show.

If you have specific questions or points to make, please call the show while it is on the air (646-200-0326). Remember, you can listen to the radio show while you are on the telephone. If you press #1, I will know that you want to ask a question or make a statement and I will talk to you directly while we are on the air. As always, Listeners are encouraged to call in.

If you would rather not talk on the show, you can also go to the show's Chat Room and text your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.

SHOW LIVE CALL IN NUMBER: (646-200-0326)

Click on the link below for more information about the show and/or to listen to the show:

www.BlogTalkRadio.com/JohnWallace

For Liberty,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
American Politics with John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com

Please vist our Liberty newspaper at:
www.LibertyNewsOnLine.com

JOHN WALLACE RADIO: ARE WE HEADING TOWARDS A COMMUNIST AMERICA?

2011-01-26T13:35:00.000-08:00

JOHN WALLACE RADIO

(THIS FRIDAY) January 28th at 5:00PM EST

TOPIC: ARE WE HEADING TOWARDS A COMMUNIST AMERICA?

This week I will be talking about the Communist movement in the USA; the importance of the 10 main planks of the Communist Manifesto as written by Karl Marx to the goals of the current progressive Movement in America. I will also ask for your opinion on whether or not you think the Communist Party is on its way to achieving their 45 published goals to destroy America as outlined by Cleon Skousen in his book "The Naked Communist." In light of their stated goarls to destroy America, is it time to outlaw the Communist Party in America as an enemy to the Republic? Do you think communist China is our friend? How about communist Russia? As always, people are encouraged to call in during the show.

If you have specific questions or points to make, please call the show while it is on the air (646-200-0326). Remember, you can listen to the radio show while you are on the telephone. If you press #1, I will know that you want to ask a question or make a statement and I will talk to you directly while we are on the air. As always, Listeners are encouraged to call in.

If you would rather not talk on the show, you can also go to the show's Chat Room and text your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.

SHOW LIVE CALL IN NUMBER: (646-200-0326)

Click on the link below for more information about the show and/or to listen to the show:

www.BlogTalkRadio.com/JohnWallace

For Liberty,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
American Politics with John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com

Please vist our Liberty newspaper at:
www.LibertyNewsOnLine.com

THE FEDERAL RESERVE SCREWS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AGAIN

2011-01-24T06:41:00.001-08:00

On January 6th, the international Banksters at the private Federal Reserve screwed the American people again and not too many people noticed. It seems that the Banksters became concerned that the Fed might suffer some monetary losses if the value of their massive amount of bond holdings were to decrease. So what did they decide to do?

Well, with the stroke of a pen, the Banksters used their usual smoke and mirrors, sleight of hand trickery to transfer any risk of becoming insolvent through bad investments by transferring that risk to the American taxpayer. It is important to point out that congress did not give the Federal Reserve the power to make the American people responsible for their bad debts and the American people were not even openly informed of the trickery of the Federal Reserve. The accounting gimmick, phrased in such a way by the use of overly technical jargon, was not immediately noticed by financial and media experts.

What is clear to this American taxpayer is that the privately held Federal Reserve does not have the authority to make the American Taxpayers responsible for their debts. The main question is “Could the Federal Reserve ever go broke?” The answer to that question has always been ‘Yes!’ They could go broke just like any other bank.

Until the American people and congress address this issue, the answer to this previous question may now be ‘No!’ If the newly created accounting gimmicks are allowed to stand, the Federal Reserve will, if they are in financial trouble, simply get money from the U.S. Treasury (from you and me) and then report it as a liability. In plain language, this means that the American taxpayers will be on the hook for any bills the Federal Reserve can’t pay and they will be getting a bailout without anyone voting on it or approving it.

In Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, the people of the United States granted Congress the power "to coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures.” The people never gave congress the constitutional power to delegate this money-creating and regulating responsibility to any private group. Yet this is exactly what the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 did. The bill was publicly promoted as a plan to reform the nation's monetary system and stabilize the currency by taking control of it out of the hands of big bankers. In reality, of course, the Federal Reserve Act was written by the big bankers for the purpose of solidifying their control over our currency.

Many Americans today wrongfully believe that the Federal Reserve is somehow part of the federal government, possibly even the Treasury Department. Many do not know that the Federal Reserve is actually a cartel of private banks that was given the power to be the sole issuer of U.S. money, with full control over its quantity and thus its value. Since this group of private bankers (the Fed) provides credit to the U.S. government when we spend money we don’t have, the Fed also is able to profit handsomely from the ever-increasing national debt. Because the Fed makes more money when the country goes deeper into debt, there is no incentive for the Fed to support any reductions in federal deficit spending. The more credit we need, the more money this cartel of private banks will make.

The actions the Federal Reserve Board takes can drastically affect the economy simply by making decisions about the money supply and interest rates. The president, congress, big business, investors, home buyers and anyone else with an interest in our economy waits with baited breath every time the Federal Reserve Board meets. If these elite private bankers decide to raise interest rates, politicians and industries could fall, homes might not be purchased and jobs could be lost. If the Fed decides to lower the interest rates, politicians, industries, investors and consumers may prosper. There is too much power vested in a handful of people whose names would not be recognized by most Americans.

Why do we allow such a small group of people on the Federal Reserve Board to wield so much power over our country’s economic well-being? As average Americans strive to earn a living, cope with rising costs of food, fuel and hopefully save or invest for the future, Congress and the Federal Reserve Board are working insidiously against them. On a daily basis, every dollar they have is being devalued through inflation.

Even though most Americans seem unaware of the current plight of the US dollar, especially in relation to the Euro, there is definitely a dollar crisis in the world economy because of the immense size of the international debt of America. America has now become the largest debtor in world history, owing somewhere between $70 and $100 Trillion. The reckless deficit spending by our government, coupled with Federal Reserve Board currency devaluation, has become one of the greatest threats facing America today. Because Congress is routinely spending more than it can tax or borrow and the Fed is routinely printing “Fiat Money” (Dollars backed by nothing) out of thin air to make up the difference, this classic “one-two punch” threatens to further destroy the value of our dollars.

The actions of both major political parties historically would seem to indicate that they want the Fed to print more “Fiat Money” to support their extravagant and unchecked spending habits. Most politicians want the printing presses to run faster and faster, create more credit, issue rebate checks, etc., so that the economy will somehow be magically healed by this dangerous financial potion, or so they believe. The President and members of Congress may love a system that generates more and more money for their special interest projects and earmarks, but the rest of us have good reason to be concerned about our monetary system and the future value of our American dollars.

Issuing “Fiat Money” has allowed our government to live well beyond its means, but that practice cannot continue much longer as it is slowly destroying the value of our dollars. History shows us that when the destruction of monetary value becomes rampant, as the actions of our congress and the Fed would indicate, nearly everyone suffers and both the economic and political structure becomes unstable. The Federal Reserve System has been the tool used by the major bankers to allow them to gain control over the smaller regional and local banks.

The Fed has also acted as the financing agency for Congress' unprecedented deficit spending on an ever growing, more intrusive federal bureaucracy and the expansion of the welfare state. Some people believe that the private bankers in the Federal Reserve wield so much power that they can intentionally manipulate the economy in order to influence the results of our presidential elections.

Our government and the American people do not need the help of any private banking cartel to manage our monetary system. We need to repeal the Federal Reserve Act and return control of our currency to Congress where it belongs, as was the intent of our Founders. We also need to have a serious national discussion about how real currency reform can be achieved.

As long as the private Banksters that make up the Federal Reserve Board have control over our nation's money supply, Congress' control of the purse-strings will not have the benefits the country’s Founders intended.

The Federal Reserve’s recent actions in flooding the world with new dollars and most recently using accounting trickery to make the American taxpayers responsible for any bad investments they make, is surely cause for immediate action by our new congress.

Let's hope they have the guts to take them on! If they don't, they will face the wrath of the American people in 2012.

JOHN WALLACE RADIO: WHY DID THE LEFT POLITICIZE THE ARIZONA SHOOTING?

2011-01-13T20:58:00.000-08:00

JOHN WALLACE RADIO

NEXT SHOW - (THIS FRIDAY) January 14th at 5:00PM EST

THIS WEEK'S TOPIC: WHY DID THE LEFT POLITICIZE THE ARIZONA SHOOTING?

This week I will talk about a number of issues including the terrible murder of six people and the wounding of a congresswoman in Arizona. The main question is why did the Socialist Democrats and the biased liberal media politicize the shooting in Arizona? Was it to advance their Liberal agenda? Was there a backlash from the American people? Could the shooting have been prevented with some earlier mental health or police intervention?

What do you think of Donald Trump running for President? Should we get rid of the mercury ladened CFL light bulbs? These and other issues will be discussed.

If you have specific questions or points to make, please call the show while it is on the air (646-200-0326). Remember, you can listen to the radio show while you are on the telephone. If you press #1, I will know that you want to ask a question or make a statement and I will talk to you directly while we are on the air. As always, Listeners are encouraged to call in.

If you woukld rather not talk on the show, you can also go to the show's Chat Room and text your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.

SHOW LIVE CALL IN NUMBER: (646-200-0326)

Click on the link below for more information about the show and/or to listen to the show.

www.BlogTalkRadio.com/JohnWallace

For Liberty,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
American Politics with John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com
www.LibertyNewsOnLine.com

WIKI-LEAKS PLANS TO RELEASE THE COMPUTERIZED CONFIDENTIAL MEDICAL RECORDS OF ALL AMERICANS

2011-01-03T19:39:00.000-08:00

What are the American people going to do when Julian Assange of Wiki-Leaks decides, at some time in the future, to release the computerized confidential medical records of all Americans that have been obtained from a disgruntled employee of the new federal government’s central medical database?

Of course, the HEADLINE OF THIS ARTICLE IS NOT TRUE, but it could happen if the Obama administration’s unconstitutional Health-Care law is fully implemented, which requires the confidential medical records of all Americans to be placed in a nationwide federal database.

Don’t you feel confident that the information in that centralized medical database would be as secure as:

1. the half a million classified national security documents that were recently stolen and posted on the WikiLeaks website, or

2. the lost government computers containing social security numbers of American citizens and veteran’s personal information, or

3. the TSA’s nude photos of airline passengers appearing on the internet?

The main question to be answered is: “Does the federal government have the constitutional authority to know anything about your personal medical history? Of course the answer is a resounding NO! They do not have the constitutional authority.

Unfortunately, if the Obama administration’s Health-Care law is fully implemented, it will be a major, unconstitutional assault on your personal privacy in a number of ways. The socialists in our government will have achieved their long-cherished goals of:

1. issuing every American a national (medical) I.D. card,

2. obtain a direct channel into your bank account by the IRS, and

3. make sure your confidential medical records are fully computerized and available to all "authorities" in a secure centralized federal database.

Although I agree that some level of computerization of medical records have some advantages for medical use at the local level, the rules contained in the Obama administration’s health-care overhaul law create very weak protections against anyone of “authority” in the federal government who wants to see the records.

Who would want to see your records and who would have access to them? The FBI, the IRS, Homeland Security agents, most federal agencies, health insurance companies, or even disaffected federal employees like U.S. Army Private Bradley Manning, who with unfettered access to the centralized medical records database records, could give or sell the confidential medical records of all Americans to data thieves, marketing companies or even to Julian Assange of WikiLeaks.

Given the well documented inefficiency with which our federal government does anything, I think it is safe to predict that mistakes from faulty data entries, loss medical records, mis-entered ID numbers, “down” computers, could lead to drastic and life-threatening medical problems or wrong medications being given to many patients.

Over time, many other people and organizations could end up with your personal, confidential information through lost government computers, accidental leaks, or by the illegal sales of medical information to advertisers or criminals by corrupt bureaucrats. To top it off, these same federal bureaucrats would most likely give you bureaucratic grief when you try to access your own records, while all "authorities" will be given an unencumbered access to them.

Thank God that U.S. District Court Judge Henry Hudson in Richmond, Virginia, said recently that the mandate on individuals in President Barack Obama’s health-care legislation goes beyond Congress’s constitution powers to regulate interstate commerce.

Judge Hudson severed the issue of the mandate, which is set to become effective in 2014, and didn’t address other provisions such as expanding Medicaid or the collection of personal medical records in a nationwide database.

“At its core, this dispute is not simply about regulating the business of insurance -- or crafting a scheme of universal health insurance coverage -- it’s about an individual’s right to choose to participate,” wrote Hudson.

The ruling is the government’s first loss in a series of challenges to the law mounted in federal courts in Virginia, Michigan and Florida, where 20 states have joined an effort to have the statute thrown out. Constitutional scholars said unless Congress changes the law, its fate on appeal will probably be determined by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Let’s hope that the U.S. Supreme Court eventually rules that the Barack Obama’s health-care legislation is unconstitutional. The American people must also be relentless in telling their elected representatives that they want this bill repealed as quickly as possible as it is an unconstitutional attack on our individual Liberty.

John W. Wallace
www.TeaPartyRep.com

A POEM: THE AMERICAN SOLDIER STANDING GUARD AT CHRISTMAS

2010-12-24T11:28:00.000-08:00

The embers glowed softly, and in their dim light,
I gazed round the room and I cherished the sight.
My wife was asleep, her head on my chest,
My daughter beside me, angelic in rest.
Outside the snow fell, a blanket of white,
Transforming the yard to a winter delight.

The sparkling lights in the tree I believe,
Completed the magic that was Christmas Eve.
My eyelids were heavy, my breathing was deep,
Secure and surrounded by love I would sleep.
In perfect contentment, or so it would seem,
So I slumbered, perhaps I started to dream.

The sound wasn't loud, and it wasn't too near,
But I opened my eyes when it tickled my ear..
Perhaps just a cough, I didn't quite know, Then the
sure sound of footsteps outside in the snow.
My soul gave a tremble, I struggled to hear,
And I crept to the door just to see who was near.

Standing out in the cold and the dark of the night,
A lone figure stood, his face weary and tight.
A soldier, I puzzled, some twenty years old,
Perhaps a Marine, huddled here in the cold.
Alone in the dark, he looked up and smiled,
Standing watch over me, and my wife and my child.

"What are you doing?" I asked without fear,
"Come in this moment, it's freezing out here!
Put down your pack, brush the snow from your sleeve,
You should be at home on a cold Christmas Eve!"
For barely a moment I saw his eyes shift,
Away from the cold and the snow blown in drifts..

To the window that danced with a warm fire's light
Then he sighed and he said "Its really all right,
I'm out here by choice. I'm here every night."
"It's my duty to stand at the front of the line,
That separates you from the darkest of times.

No one had to ask or beg or implore me,
I'm proud to stand here like my fathers before me.
My Gramps died at ' Pearl on a day in December,"
Then he sighed, "That's a Christmas 'Gram always remembers."
My dad stood his watch in the jungles of ' Nam ',
And now it is my turn and so, here I am.

I've not seen my own son in more than a while,
But my wife sends me pictures, he's sure got her smile.
Then he bent and he carefully pulled from his bag,
The red, white, and blue... an American flag.
I can live through the cold and the being alone,
Away from my family, my house and my home.

I can stand at my post through the rain and the sleet,
I can sleep in a foxhole with little to eat.
I can carry the weight of killing another,
Or lay down my life with my sister and brother...
Who stand at the front against any and all,
To ensure for all time that this flag will not fall.."

" So go back inside," he said, "harbor no fright,
Your family is waiting and I'll be all right."
"But isn't there something I can do, at the least,
"Give you money," I asked, "or prepare you a feast?
It seems all too little for all that you've done,
For being away from your wife and your son."

Then his eye welled a tear that held no regret,
"Just tell us you love us, and never forget.
To fight for our rights back at home while we're gone,
To stand your own watch, no matter how long.
For when we come home, either standing or dead,
To know you remember we fought and we bled.
Is payment enough, and with that we will trust,
That we mattered to you as you mattered to us."

-------------------------------------------------
PLEASE, would you do me the kind favor of sending this to as many
people as you can?

Christmas is upon us and some credit is due to our U.S service men and women for our being able to celebrate these festivities. Let's try in this small way to pay a tiny bit of what we owe. Make people stop and think of our heroes, living and dead, who sacrificed themselves for us.

By an Anonymous and Gratefull American Citizen

START TREATY: RINO REPUBLICANS ARE SURRENDERING OUR NATIONAL SECURITY LIKE THE COWARDS THEY ARE!

2010-12-21T09:15:00.001-08:00

What the hell are our elected Senators doing? Why are they rushing forward with the START treaty without a full debate on the ramifications of this treaty and the threat to our national security from communist Russia that it poses.

Where are the really tough American men and women that we need in both houses of congress to defend our country's liberties, Freedoms and national sovereignty?

I for one am getting very tired of Metrosexual Socialist Democrats and RINO Republicans who sell out the American people every chance they get. I want my President, my two Senators and my Congress person to be real tough Americans, who will look out for my interests and those of my fellow American citizens, not illegal aliens, crooked banksters, special interest groups or foreign governments.

We don't need any more mamby-pamby, politically correct, impecably dressed, phoney politicans that are selling us out every chance they get.

These politicians bettter wise up, because they are pushing loyal Americans to the breaking point.

Not only are the American people against this treaty , but more than 30 former defense or foreign policy government officials and related experts have signed an open letter to the Senate Monday expressing their “professional judgment” that President Barack Obama’s proposed nuclear weapons reduction treaty with the Russians, called New START, “is not consistent with the national security interests of the United States,” and “should be rejected by the U.S. Senate,” which is considering it now.

They argue that Russia easily could cheat secretly to our detriment, that it would restrict deployment of new U.S. anti-missile defenses, that it would reduce the survivability and flexibility of our our strategic forces and could be militarily destabilizing, that it permits a continued large Russian superiority in overall nuclear weapons, and that resulting insecurity among our allies about continued extended deterrence could lead to intensified production and proliferation of nuclear weapons—all unintended, harmful consequences, the opposite of the Obama Administration’s announced goals for the agreement.

Among the many signers are: Ambassador Ed Rowny, former U.S. chief START negotiator; Vice Adm. Robert Monroe, U.S. Navy (Ret), former director, Defense Nuclear Agency; Judge William Clark, former national security adviser to President Reagan; Honorable Paula DeSutter, former assistant secretary of State for Verification, Compliance, and Implementation; Honorable Fred Ikle, former director, U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, Ambassador Read Hammer, former deputy director, U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, and former chief U.S. START Negotiator; Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerny, U.S. Air Force (Ret.), former deputy chief of staff; Ambassador John Bolton, former undersecretary of State for arms control and international security, and former U.S. ambassador to the U.N.; Ambassador Henry Cooper, former director, Strategic Defense Initiative of the Department of Defense, and former U.S. chief negotiator, Defense and Space Talks with the Soviet Union; and Hon. Edwin Meese, III, fomer counselor to the president and former U.S. attorney general.

More specifically, despite Obama administration claims to the contrary, the former officials and experts say that the proposed New START treaty has the following major problems, among others:

1. It would effectively limit further U.S. anti-missile defenses for the American homeland in the face of growing rogue nation/terrorist nuclear threats, saying “it would be folly to limit, let alone preclude, available options to do so” in the future.

2. It "is simply not adequately verifiable,” and “the Russians could engage in militarily significant violations with little fear of detection by the US,” with years being needed before we could respond adequately.
It “would reduce the survivability and flexibility of our (strategic) forces.”
Its low limits on the number of nuclear launchers could end up being militarily and strategically destabilizing;

3. It would solidify a large Russian superiority in nuclear weapons when considering its 10-to-1 advantage in tactical nuclear weapons, many of which have strategic capabilities and roles, and which have been termed an “urgent” problem by the Congressional Strategic Posture Commission.
It could force cuts in some of our vital conventional capabilities (i.e., heavy bombers) as well.

4. It would “create concerns” among our allies about America’s continuing extended deterrent capability to protect them, which could lead to “intensified proliferation” of nuclear weapons.

5. "It is unnecessary and ill-advised for the US to make these sorts of deep reductions in its strategic forces” so that the Russians are authorized/enabled to modernize and build up to our levels.

6. The statement closes by saying, “For all these reasons, we urge the members of the US Senate to resist pressure to consider the New START Treaty during the lame-duck session. The Senate should reject this accord and begin instead a long overdue and vitally needed process of modernization of the nuclear stockpile and refurbishment of the weapons complex that supports it. Only by taking such steps can we ensure that we will, in fact, have the 'safe, secure, and effective deterrent' that even President Obama says we will need for the foreseeable future.”

FOLLOWING IS THE TEXT OF THE LETTER:

----------------------------------

OPEN LETTER TO THE U.S. SENATE on the New START Treaty

As you know, President Obama insists that the United States Senate advise and consent during the present lame-duck session to the bilateral U.S.-Russian strategic arms control treaty known as "New START" that he signed earlier this year in Prague. It is our considered professional judgment that this treaty and the larger disarmament agenda which its ratification would endorse are not consistent with the national security interests of the United States, and that both should be rejected by the Senate.

Administration efforts to compel the Senate to vote under circumstances in which an informed and full debate are effectively precluded is inconsistent with your institution's precedents, its constitutionally mandated quality-control responsibilities with respect to treaties and, in particular, the critical deliberation New START requires in light of that accord's myriad defects, of which the following are especially problematic:

It is unnecessary and ill-advised for the United States to make these sorts of deep reductions in its strategic forces in order to achieve sharp cuts in those of the Russian Federation. After all, the Kremlin's strategic systems have not been designed for long service lives. Consequently, the number of deployed Russian strategic intercontinental-range ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) and long-range, nuclear-capable bombers will drop dramatically, with or without a new arms control agreement.

Russian sources indicate that, within eight-to-nine years, Russian Federation's inventory of strategic launchers will have shrunk from approximately 680 launchers today (some of which already are no longer operational) to approximately 270 launchers, simply as a result of the aging of their systems and the pace of their modernization program. By contrast, the service life of existing U.S. systems extends several decades. In other words, the Russians are going to undergo a substantial contraction in the size of its strategic nuclear arsenal, whether we do or not.

There are serious downsides for the United States in moving to the sorts of low numbers of strategic launchers called for in the New START Treaty. These include:

New START would encourage placing more warheads on the remaining launchers, i.e., "MIRVing" — which is precisely what the Russians are doing. Moving away from heavily MIRVed strategic launchers has long been considered a highly stabilizing approach to the deployment of strategic forces — and a key U.S. START goal.

New START would reduce the survivability and flexibility of our forces — which is exactly the wrong posture to be adopting in the uncertain and dynamic post-Cold War strategic environment. The bipartisan Congressional Strategic Posture Commission concluded that "preserving the resilience and survivability of U.S. forces" is essential. The very low launcher levels required by New START are at odds with both of those necessary conditions.

New START's low ceilings on launchers and warheads can only create concerns about America's extended deterrent. Allied nations have privately warned that the United States must not reduce its strategic force levels to numbers so low that they call into question the credibility of the U.S. nuclear umbrella or encourage China to see an opportunity to achieve strategic parity with the United States. Some of those who have long looked to us for security may feel constrained to develop and field their own deterrents — a formula for intensified proliferation.

New START's limitations could result in the destruction of U.S. multi-purpose strategic bombers, affecting not only the robustness of our nuclear deterrent but cutting into our conventional capabilities, as well.

Were the United States to slash its strategic nuclear forces to match those the Russians can afford, it would ironically ensure that it has far fewer nuclear weapons — not parity with the Kremlin — when the latter's ten-to-one advantage in tactical weapons is taken into account. The Russians have consistently refused to limit their tactical nuclear arms, and will surely continue to do so in the future, especially since Moscow has little incentive to negotiate limitations on such weapons when the numbers are so asymmetrical.

This stance should not be surprising since it is this category of weaponry that makes up the bulk of Moscow's nuclear stockpile. Russian doctrine emphasizes the war-fighting utility of such weapons and their modernization and exercising remain a priority for the Kremlin. In fact, some of those weapons with an explosive power comparable to, if not greatly in excess of, that of the Hiroshima bomb are believed to be aboard submarines and routinely targeted at the United States. Others are targeted against our allies. These were among the reasons that prompted the Congressional Strategic Posture Commission to identify the Russian tactical nuclear arsenal as an "urgent" problem.

Such capabilities constitute a real asymmetric advantage for Moscow. What is more, given that these Russian tactical nuclear weapons are of greatest concern with regard to the potential for nuclear war and proliferation, we cannot safely ignore their presence in large numbers in Russia's arsenal. It is certainly ill-advised to make agreements reducing our nuclear deterrent that fail to take them into account.

New START imposes de facto or de jure limitations on such important U.S. non-nuclear capabilities as prompt global strike and missile defenses. In the future, the nation is likely to need the flexibility to field both in quantity. It would be folly to limit, let alone effectively preclude, available options to do so.
New START is simply not adequately verifiable. Lest assurances that the treaty will be "effectively" verifiable obscure that reality, the truth is that the Russians could engage in militarily significant violations with little fear of detection by the United States. And, for reasons discussed below, it could take years before we could respond appropriately.
These and other deficiencies of the New START treaty are seriously exacerbated by the context in which Senators are being asked to consent to its ratification. Specifically, the Senate's endorsement of this accord would amount to an affirmation of the disarmament agenda for which it is explicitly said to be a building block — namely, Mr. Obama's stated goal of "ridding the world of nuclear weapons."

This goal has shaped the administration's Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) and would, if left unchanged, condemn the United States to a posture of unilateral nuclear disarmament. (See, in this regard, the attached essay by Vice Admiral Robert Monroe, which appeared in the Wall Street Journal on August 25, 2010.) By precluding the development and production of new nuclear weapons and the realistic testing of those currently in the stockpile and by "devaluing" the role played by these weapons and the mission of those responsible for maintaining our deterrent, the NPR sets the stage for the continued obsolescence and atrophying of our arsenal. No other nuclear power is engaged in such behavior. And, given our global security responsibilities and the growing dangers from various quarters, neither should we.

For all these reasons, we urge you to resist pressure to consider the New START Treaty during the lame-duck session. The Senate should reject this accord and begin instead a long-overdue and vitally needed process of modernization of the nuclear stockpile and refurbishment of the weapons complex that supports it. Only by taking such steps can we ensure that we will, in fact, have the "safe, secure and effective deterrent" that even President Obama says we will need for the foreseeable future.

Sincerely,

Judge William P. Clark, former national security advisor to the president

Hon. Edwin Meese III, former counselor the president; former U.S. attorney general

Hon. Kathleen Bailey, former assistant director, U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency

Norman Bailey, former senior director of International Economic Affairs

Hon. Robert B. Barker, former assistant to the secretary of Defense (atomic energy)

Amb. John Bolton, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, former undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, former assistant secretary of State for international organization affairs

Brig. Gen. Jimmy L. Cash, U.S. Air Force (Ret.), former vice commander, 7th Air Force

Honorable Fred S. Celec, former assistant to thesecretary of Defense for nuclear and chemical and biological defense programs

Ambassador Henry F. Cooper, former director, Strategic Defense Initiative, former chief U.S. negotiator, defense and space talks with the Soviet Union

Honorable Paula DeSutter, former assistant secretary of State for verification, compliance, and implementation

Honorable Fritz W. Ermarth, former chairman and national intelligence officer, National Intelligence Council; former member of the National Security Council staff

Frank J. Gaffney Jr., former assistant secretary of Defense for international security policy (acting)

Daniel J. Gallington, former secretary of Defense representative, defense and space talks; former general counsel, United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and former special assistant to the secretary of Defense for policy

Honorable Bruce S. Gelb, former director, U.S. Information Agency, former ambassador to Belgium

Honorable William Graham, former chairman, General Advisory Committee on Arms Control, former science adviser to the president, former deputy administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Ambassador Read Hammer, former U.S. chief START negotiator; former deputy director, U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency

Honorable Fred Iklé, former undersecretary of Defense for policy

Sven F. Kraemer, former arms control director, National Security Council

Dr. John Lenczowksi, former director of European and Soviet affairs, National Security Council

Admassador James "Ace" Lyons Jr., U.S. Navy (Ret.), former commander in chief, U.S. Pacific Fleet

Tidal W. McCoy, former secretary of the Air Force (acting)

Lt. Gen. Thomas G. McInerney, U.S. Air Force (Ret.), former deputy chief of staff

Honorable J. William Middendorf II, former secretary of the Navy, former ambassador to the European Union, the Netherlands, and the Organization of American States

Vice Adm. Robert Monroe, U.S. Navy (Ret.), former director, Defense Nuclear Agency

Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, former senior staff, Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States; former senior staff, Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack

Roger W. Robinson Jr., former senior director of International Economic Affairs at the National Security Council, former executive secretary of the Cabinet-level Senior Inter-Governmental Group for International Economic Policy

Ambassador Ed Rowny, former U.S. chief START negotiator; former special adviser to President Ronald Reagan on arms control

Michael S. Swetnam, former program monitor, intelligence community staff with liaison responsibilities to INF and START Interagency Groups, and former member of the Technical Advisory Group to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely, U.S. Army (Ret.), former deputy commander, U.S. Army Pacific

Honorable Michelle Van Cleave, former national counterintelligence executive

Dr. William Van Cleave, former director, Department of Defense Transition Team

Honorable Troy Wade, former director, Defense Programs, U.S. Department of Energy.

----------------------------

A FABLE ABOUT "THE ONE"

2010-12-16T06:22:00.000-08:00

And it came to pass in the Age of Insanity that the people of the land called America, having lost their morals, their initiative, and their Will to defend their liberties, chose as their Supreme Leader: that Person known as "THE ONE."

He emerged from the vapors with a message that had no meaning; but He Hypnotized the people telling them, "I am sent to save you." My lack Of experience, my questionable ethics, my monstrous ego, and my Association with evil doers are of no consequence. I shall save you With Hope and Change. Go, therefore, and proclaim throughout the Land that he who proceeded me is evil, that he has defiled the nation, And that all he has built must be destroyed.

And the people rejoiced, For even though they knew not what "The One" would do, he had promised That it was good; and they believed. And "The One" said " We live in The greatest country in the world. Help me change everything about it!" And the people said, "Hallelujah! Change is good!"

Then He said, "We are going to tax the rich fat-cats." And the People said "Sock it to them!" "And redistribute their wealth." And The people said, "Show us the money!" And the he said, "Redistribution of wealth is good for everybody.."

And Joe the plumber asked, " Are you kidding me? You're going to
Steal my money and give it to the deadbeats??" And "The One" Ridiculed and taunted him, and Joe's personal records were hacked and publicized.

One lone reporter asked, "Isn't that Marxist policy?" And she was Banished from the Kingdom's press corps ".

Then a citizen asked, "With no foreign relations experience and Having zero military experience or knowledge, how will you deal with Radical terrorists?" And "The One" said, "Simple. I shall sit with Them and talk with them and show them how nice we really are; and they Will forget that they ever wanted to kill us all!" And the people Said, "Hallelujah!! We are safe at last, and we can beat our weapons Into free cars for the people!"

Then "The One" said "I shall give 95% of you lower taxes." And one, lone voice said, "But 40% of us don't pay ANY taxes." So "The One" said, "Then I shall give you some of the taxes the fat-cats pay!" And the people said, "Hallelujah! Show us the money!"

Then "The One" said, "I shall tax your Capital Gains when you sell your homes!" And the people yawned and the slumping housing market collapsed. And He said. "I shall mandate employer-funded health care or every worker and raise the minimum wage. And I shall give every person unlimited healthcare and medicine and transportation to the clinics." And the people said, "Give me some of that!"

Then he said, "I shall penalize employers who ship jobs overseas."
And the people said, "Where's my rebate check?"

Then "The One" said, "I shall bankrupt the coal industry and electricity rates will skyrocket!" And the people said, "Coal is dirty, coal is evil, no more coal! But we don't care for that part about higher electric rates." So "The One" said, Not to worry. If your rebate isn't enough to cover your expenses, we shall bail you out. Just sign up with ACORN or LaRAZA and your troubles will be over!"

Then He said, "Illegal immigrants feel scorned and slighted. Let's grant them Amnesty, Social Security, free education, free lunches, free medical care, bi-lingual signs and guaranteed housing..." And the people said, "Hallelujah!" and they made him king!

And so it came to pass that employers, facing spiraling costs and ever-higher taxes, raised their prices and laid off workers. Others simply gave up and went out of business and the economy sank like unto a rock dropped from a cliff.

The banking industry was destroyed. Manufacturing slowed to a crawl. And more of the people were without a means of support.

Then "The One" said, "I am the "the Chosen One"- The Messiah - and I'm here to save you! We shall just print more money so everyone will have enough!" But our foreign trading partners said unto Him. "Wait a minute. Your dollar is not worth a pile of camel dung! You will have to pay more...

And "The One" said, "Wait a minute. That is not fair!!" And the world said, "Neither are these other idiotic programs you have embraced. Lo, you have become a Socialist state and a second-rate power. Now you shall play by our rules!"

And the people cried out, "Alas, alas!! What have we done?" But yea verily, it was too late. The people set upon The One and spat upon him and stoned him, and his name was dung. And the once mighty nation was no more; and the once proud people were without sustenance or shelter or hope.

And the Change "The One" had given them was as like unto a poison that had destroyed them and like a whirlwind that consumed all that they had built.

And the people beat their chests in despair and cried out in anguish, "give us back our nation and our pride and our hope!!" But it was too late, and their homeland was no more.

You may think this a fairy tale, but it's not.
It's happening RIGHT NOW in America!
So, get off of your rear end, get up and do something about it!

WHICH SENATORS GOT PAID OFF TO SUPPORT THE "FDA FOOD SAFETY AND MODERNIZATION ACT"?

2010-11-21T16:42:00.001-08:00

The following is a list of U.S Senators and the Bribes (I mean campaign contributions) that these Senators received from Special Interest Groups to either support or oppose S.510 - The FDA Food Safety and Modernization Act. I have listed the names of the Senators, the Party and State, and the amount of Special Interest Bribes (I mean campaign contributions) that they received:

Name of Senator - Party & State - Bribe For S.510 or Bribe Against S.510

Daniel Akaka - D HI - Bribe For: $27,690 - Against: $700

Lamar Alexander - R TN - Bribe For: $190,421 - Against: $4,850

John Barrasso - R WY - Bribe For: $31,350 - Against: $27,500

Max Baucus - D MT - Bribe for: $123,803 - Against: $55,980

Evan Bayh - D IN - Bribe For: $45,200 - Against: 8,250

Mark Begich - D AK - Bribe For: $23,050 - Against: $2,000

Michael Bennet - D CO - Bribe For: $38,509 - Against: $22,050

Robert Bennett - R UT - Bribe For: $105,530 - Against: $10,000

Jeff Bingaman - D NM - Bribe For: $31,498 - Against: $8,450

Christopher Bond - R MO - Bribe For: $49,550 - Against: $5,200

Barbara Boxer - D CA - Bribe For: $120,000 - Against: $13,650

Sherrod Brown - D OH - Bribe For: $57,800 - Against: $6,600

Samuel Brownback - R KS - Bribe For: $20,950 - Against: $13,500

Jim Bunning - R KY - Brobe For: $20,700 - Against: $2,000

Richard Burr - R NC - Bribe For: $328,086 - Against: $32,292

Roland Burris - D IL - Bribe For: $0 - Against: $0

Maria Cantwell - D WA - Bribe For: $93,541 - Against: $2,750

Benjamin Cardin - D MD - Bribe For: $72,200 - Against: $0

Thomas Carper - D DE - Bribe For: $83,150 - Against: $0

Robert Casey - D PA - Bribe For: $80,576 - Against: $4,600

Saxby Chambliss - R GA - Bribe For: $557,694 - Against: $108,041

Thomas Coburn R OK - Bribe For: $64,400 - Against: $14,200

Thad Cochran - R MS - Bribe For: $50,144 - Against: $22,000

Susan Collins - R ME - Bribe For: $157,438 - Against: $7,800

Kent Conrad - D ND - Bribe For: $41,650 - Against: $29,612

Bob Corker - R TN - Bribe For: $298,639 - Against: $8,850

John Cornyn - R TX - Bribe For: $286,648 - Against: $254,730

Michael Crapo - R ID - Bribe For: $64,199 - Against: $14,350

Jim DeMint - R SC - Bribe For: $149,935 - Against: $5,000

Christopher Dodd - D CT - Bribe For: $36,400 - Against: $4,500

Byron Dorgan - D ND - Bribe For: $28,200 - Against: $6,000

Richard Durbin - D IL - Bribe For: $151,050 - Against: $19,000

John Ensign - R NV - Bribe For: $76,297 - Against: $10,500

Michael Enzi - R WY - Bribe For: $87,394 - Against: $21,450

Russell Feingold - D WI - Bribe For: $53,854 - Against: $2,200

Dianne Feinstein - D CA - Bribe For: $168,189 - Against: 25,314

Kirsten Gillibrand - D NY - Bribe For: $98,210 - Against: $10,650

Lindsey Graham - R SC - Bribe For: $101,272 - Against: $5,700

Charles Grassley - R IA - Bribe For: $112,150 - Against: $25,500

Judd Gregg - R NH - Bribe For: $26,000 - Against: $0

Kay Hagan - D NC - Bribe For: $36,250 - Against: $3,500

Thomas Harkin - D IA - Bribe For: $138,135 - Against: $40,600

Orrin Hatch - R UT - Bribe For: $102,215 - Against: $11,600

Kay Hutchison - R TX - Bribe For: $127,811 - Against: $103,386

James Inhofe - R OK - Bribe For: $66,744 - Against: $36,430

Daniel Inouye - D HI - Bribe For: $26,350 - Against: $11,200

John Isakson - R GA - Bribe For: $280,995 - Against: $10,100

Mike Johanns - R NE - Bribe For: $159,259 - Against: $59,785

Tim Johnson - D SD - Bribe For: $26,850 - Against: $15,000

Edward Kaufman - D DE - Bribe For: $0 - Against: $0

John Kerry - D MA - Bribe For: $14,406 - Against: $250

Amy Klobuchar - D MN - Bribe For: $149,778 - Against: $16,250

Herbert Kohl - D WI - Bribe For: $300 - Against: $0

Jon Kyl - R AZ - Bribe For: $363,660 - Against: $58,906

Mary Landrieu - D LA - Bribe For: $73,622 - Against: $2,250

Frank Lautenberg - D NJ - Bribe For: $37,883 - Agqinst: $3,550

Patrick Leahy - D VT - Bribe For: $13,800 - Against: $2,750

Carl Levin - D MI - Bribe For: $49,900 - Against: $2,000

Joseph Lieberman - I CT - Bribe For: $121,075 - Against: $0

Blanche Lincoln - D AR - Bribe For: $347,526 - Against: $125,297

Richard Lugar - R IN - Bribe For: $153,579 - Against: $21,000

John McCain - R AZ - Bribe For: $118,070 - Against: $21,525

Claire McCaskill - D MO - Bribe For: $48,950 - Against: $7,650

Mitch McConnell - R KY - Bribe For: $439,593 - Against: $42,244

Robert Menéndez - D NJ - Bribe For: $183,850 - Against: $250

Jeff Merkley - D OR - Bribe For: $27,350 - Against; $3,300

Barbara Mikulski - D MD - Bribe For: $52,165 - Against: $1,000

Lisa Murkowski - R AK - Bribe For: $164,713 - Against: $5,800

Patty Murray - D WA - Bribe For: $136,500 - Against: $3,150

Ben Nelson - D NE - Bribe For: $254,906 - Against: $44,950

Bill Nelson - D FL - Bribe For: $205,471 - Against: $35,748

Mark Pryor - D AR - Bribe For: $115,550 - Against: $16,565

John Reed - D RI - Bribe For: $29,350 - Against: $0

Harry Reid - D NV - Bribe For: $133,985 - Against: $10,000

James Risch - R ID - Bribe For: $56,750 - Against; $36,050

Pat Roberts - R KS - Bribe For: $167,294 - Against: $65,186

John Rockefeller - D WV - Bribe For: $21,250 - Against: $1,000

Bernard Sanders - I VT - Bribe For: $7,800 - Against: $4,200

Charles Schumer - D NY - Bribe For: $175,185 - Against: $14,200

Jefferson Sessions - R AL - Bribe For: $65,303 - Against: $16,800

Jeanne Shaheen - D NH - Bribe For: $17,090 - Against: $7,300

Richard Shelby - R AL - Bribe For: $73,616 - Against: $10,000

Olympia Snowe - R ME - Bribe For: $78,136 - Against: $2,000

Arlen Specter - D PA - Bribe For: $209,124 - Against: $9,400

Debbie Ann Stabenow - D MI - Bribe For: $84,941 - Against: $14,482

Jon Tester - D MT - Bribe For: $21,250 - Against: $61,550

John Thune - R SD - Bribe For: $218,900 - Against: $55,625

Mark Udall - D CO - Bribe For: $34,435 - Against: $45,050

Tom Udall - D NM - Bribe For: $27,102 - Against: $51,900

David Vitter - R LA - Bribe For: $188,225 - Against: $8,500

George Voinovich - R OH - Bribe For: $103,850 - Against: $185

Mark Warner - D VA - Bribe For: $116,450 - Against: $8,600

Jim Webb - D VA - Bribe For: $25,300 - Against: $7,700

Sheldon Whitehouse- D RI - Bribe For: $27,025 - Against: $1,500

Roger Wicker - R MS - Bribe For: $147,650 - Against: $16,250

Ron Wyden - D OR - Bribe For: $58,700 - Against: $4,900

Here's a list of the Special Interest Groups that support S.510 and how much they bribed (I mean donated) to Senators:

Restaurants & drinking establishments $3,217,767
Food and kindred products manufacturing $1,753,503
Milk & dairy producers $1,717,687
Food stores $1,473,532
Beverages (non-alcoholic) $744,551
Vegetables, fruits and tree nut $709,238
American Veterinarian Medical Association $551,750
Beverage bottling & distribution $289,725
Food wholesalers $284,900
Food & Beverage Products and Services $281,137
Fishing $277,984
Chambers of commerce $219,234
Manufacturing $207,740
Food catering & food services $171,835
Confectionery processors & manufacturers $96,438
Consumer groups $6,100
Farm bureaus $0

Here's a list of Here's a list of the Special Interest Groups that sopposed S.510 and how much they bribed (I mean donated) to Senators:

Milk & dairy producers $1,717,687
Livestock $1,561,207
Farm organizations & cooperatives $412,976
Consumer groups $6,100
Farmers, crop unspecified $0

I wonder how the Senators will Vote when the bill reaches the floor of the Senate?

THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE; IT'S TIME TO INVESTIGATE AND PROSECUTE THEM

2010-11-06T10:17:00.000-07:00

The Federal Reserve recently announced that it would be repeating their previous con-game trick called "Quantitative Easing" that they say is designed to save the American economy. "Quantitive Easing" is a process by which the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury conspire to print a massive amount of new "fiat money" backed by absolutely nothing in order for the Federal Reserve to buy American government debt. In other words, they are using phoney money to buy back their own debt. Don't you wish you could pay off your debts, just by printing your own dollars backed up by absolutely nothing? Please tell me how this move by the Federal Reserve helps the American people?

You see, when the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury enter into a criminal conspiracy to print more fiat money, it puts more American dollars into circulation, which in turn lowers the value of the American dollar, which in turn causes you to pay more dollars to buy the same things you bought at a lower price a month or two before. Our money is worth less; it causes inflation and our cost of living goes up. Please tell me how this move by the Federal Reserve helps the American people?

Patrick Henry's famous words, "no taxation without representation," are as important and relevant today, as they were when he first said them in 1750 and let us remember that in 2010, "Taxation Without Representation" is still Tyranny! Today, we have a new King. He is just as bad and evil as the one who ruled the British Empire in 1776. His name is Benjamin Bernanke. Although his office and position in the Federal Reserve Bank was never written into the Constitution, he and his group of criminal Banksters have been allowed to accumulate more economic power than the President of the United States.

King Bernanke's "Parliament" is the Open Markets Committee of the Federal Reserve Bank. "We the People" are once again being illegally and unconstitutionally oppressed by taxation without representation. King Bernanke and his unelected "Private Parliament" are levying unconstitutional taxes on the American people in the form of inflation without our consent. Just as the colonists declared their independence from the chains and shackles of servitude to the King of England in 1776, it is now time the American people to declare their independence from the chains and shackles of servitude to the Banksters running Federal Reserve Bank.

You say you don't believe me. Well, take a look at the Commodity Research Bureau (CRB) Index. The CRB index tracks the prices of a basket of goods. The Index just hit a new 52-week high at the end of October 2010. Here are some examples that you probably have noticed in the supermarket and retail stores recently. It tells you how much prices have gone up in the last 12 months:

COTTON - price up 85 percent; SILVER - price up 51 percent; COFFEE - price up 50 percent; CORN - price up 41 percent; GOLD - price up 30 percent; SOYBEANS - price up 28 percent; SUGAR - price up 27 percent; COPPER - price up 26 percent; and WHEAT - price up 25 percent.

The new round of "Quantitative Easing" by the Federal Reserve, might include the printing of as much as $2 trillion or more of worthless fiat dollars and placing these new dollars into the economy. This will cause prices of commodities go higher once again and “tax” you via inflation even more. Please tell me how this move by the Federal Reserve helps the American people?

Let's say I and a couple of my associates decided that through some sort of criminal trickery, we could cheat our fellow Americans out of their money, or at least make their money less valuable, while we made $Millions or even $Billions of dollars.. We would be considered an organized criminal enterprise and would eventually be prosecuted for operating an organized "Scheme to Defraud" by the federal government.

Why then do the American people and their elected representatives stand by and allow a private group of Banksters called the Federal Reserve, who conspire with government officials and other fellow travelers, to cheat the American people out of $Trillions of dollars of their hard earned money, or at least make it less valuable, without being charged with a crime?

To top it off, the privately owned Federal Reserve has been manipulating our economy for 97 years and we still don't even know who the private shareholders of the organization are. This group of Elites are a very secret group of anonymous individuals and organizations who are very well insulated from public scrutiny, just like other high level criminal enterprise leaders. Yet, the American people remain at their mercy as these criminals attain super wealth status because they are permitted to manipulate and control our entire economy from behind a curtain secrecy, bribery and corruption.

Why has the Federal Reserve not been thoroughly audited since it was created in 1913?

Why has the Federal Reserve resisted every attempt to be audited? and

Why do our elected representatives seem reluctant to audit the Fed?

The answer is simple. The Federal Reserve is a criminal enterprise and a complete audit would clearly show that it has been involved in illegal activity for a very long time, with the cooperation of many of our elected and appointed federal officials and a small group of Wall Street firms and private financial institutions. How then can the American people continue to allow this secret, private organization, whose shareholders remain unknown, to run our economy?

It is definitely time for a full fledged congressional investigation and a separate criminal investigation of these globalist crooks. These Banksters at the Federal Reserve, along with their federal government co-conspirators, have stolen $Billions if not $Trillions of dollars from the American taxpayers by means of fraud, counterfeiting and participation in an ongoing criminal enterprise with other private financial entities.

The process of printing worthless, phoney money is called counterfeiting and it is still a crime. Not only should the Federal Reserve be audited as soon as possible, but the limited number of Bankster shareholders of the private Federal Reserve should be identified, investigated and prosecuted under the The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly referred to as RICO Act or RICO).

RICO is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. While the law's original intended use was to prosecute the Mafia as well as others who are actively engaged in traditional organized criminal enterprises, its application clearly can be used against the Federal Reserve Banksters, along with their federal government and private financial institution co-conspirators.

Any reasonable person can clearly see that there are many individuals associated with the Federal Reserve, including its shareholders and emloyees, along with elected and appointed federal government officials, who have been involved in a long term criminal conspiracy through their coordinated manipulation of our entire economic system. These white-collar criminals have illegally destroyed the value of the dollar and weakened the country financially, while at the same time, making $Billions of dollars in illegal profits for themselves and their co-conspirators, all at the expense of the American people.

It's time to stop them! It's time to investigate and prosecute them as the criminals they are!

JOHN WALLACE RADIO: THE 10TH AMENDMENT AND STATE SOVEREIGNTY ISSUES

2010-11-04T17:50:00.001-07:00

AMERICAN POLITICS RADIO SHOW - SHOW REMINDER:

NEXT SHOW - (THIS FRIDAY) November 5th at 5:00PM EST

GUEST: RICK MONTES - NY 10TH AMENDMENT CENTER

TOPIC: 10th AMENDMENT - STATE SOVEREIGNTY - STATE NULLIFICATION

This week on American Politics, my Guest will be Mr. Rick Montes, of the New York Tenth Amendment Center. The Tenth Amendment reads as follows: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Rick will talk about the power of the 10th Amendment and what the states can do when the federal government oversteps their limited, enumerated powers and the discussion will include the power of State Nullification of federal laws and State Sovereignty issues.

Is the federal government becomming too large and too intrusive in our everyday lives? Are they passing laws and issuing regulations on subjects (like HealthCare and Education) that they have no authority in the U.S. Constitution to be involved in? Call in and let us know what you think!

-------------------

If you have specific questions of my guest or points to make, please call the show while it is on the air (646-200-0326). Remember, you can listen to the radio show while you are on the telephone. As always, Listeners are encouraged to call in.

You can also go to the Chat Room and text your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.

CALL IN NUMBER: (646-200-0326)

Click on the link below for more information about the show and/or to listen to the show.

www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace

For Liberty,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
American Politics with John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com
Email: john@TeaPartyRep.com

LIBERTY NEWS ONLINE ENDORSES CARL PALADINO FOR GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK

2010-10-31T17:18:00.001-07:00

Carl Paladino is now in the final hours of his campaign for Governor and we are honored to endorse him. This online newspaper understands that Carl has been the victim of the drive-by, Cuomo-friendly, corporate owned media. We know that Mr. Paladino is politically inexperienced and has a few personal flaws; Don't we all.

Our analysis of both candidates, however, shows that Carl Paladino is also the candidate who most clearly comprehends the catastrophe that has engulfed the state of New York and more faithfully stands by the principles of a sound economy that will have to be at the center of any effort to turn New York around.

I have met Mr. Paladino several times, including one in Columbia County, where he was vetted by a variety of Tea Party groups. He spoke fondly of his father calling him over to his deathbed to apologize for being unable to leave him an inheritance of wealth. He recounted his own education and his years practicing law and his success in business. He spoke of the death, a year ago in an automobile accident, of one of his sons, and the way he formed his own commitment to make a run for public life. If he loses this or any other quest, he said: "it won’t be even close to the worst thing that has ever happened to me."

Although Mr. Paladino has tried to focus on the main issues before voters, which are the state’s budget catastrophe and the culture of government entitlement in Albany, the main-stream media did not want to focus on the issues, because it would hurt their man, Andrew Cuomo. It is clear to this on-line newspaper that Carl Paladino is a more honest, intelligent, credible and moral man than Mr. Cuomo or Mr. Cuomo’s political party. Carl Paladino is a student of not only the American Constitution but — and he spoke convincingly on this head — also the constitution of New York State. He comprehends that the state constitution gives the upper hand in the budget process to the governor.

Though Mr. Paladino knows it is very difficult for a Republican to win in a heavily Democratic state, he has the "street smarts" and "grit" that will be needed to win the election and "take out the trash" in Albany.

He has a taxpayer's sympathy for those abandoned by the kind of desolation that has been created by the tax-and-spend policies of the Democrats. He insists he wants but one term and intends, thereafter, to go back to his business. There is a constant barage of misinformation and Cuomo-land hype from the main-stream media that tells the people that Mr. Paladino is going to lose to Mr. Cuomo.

We disagree!. Mr. Paladino was placed on the ballot by the people of New York State through a people's program called Primary Challenge, not by the Republican Party. He won the primary because the people voted for him, not party regulars. A week before the primary election, Mr. Paladino was down 14 points against the party choice candidate, Rick Lazio and he beat him 65% to 35% on election day. The polls were wrong.

The most recent polls have Mr. Paladino again down by 14 points, this time against Mr. Cuomo. Mr. Cuomo is not just running the standard race against a Republican. Mr. Cuomo is running against Republicans, Conservatives, Independence Party members, dis-affected Democrats and a very, very large number of people who have no party allegiance. We think the polls will be wrong again.

Even the Democrats realize that Carl Paladino is the people's choice, that's why they have been using every "dirty trick" in the book against him, even sending friendly newspaper photographers to Carl's 10 year old daughter's bedroom window to take pictures of her. No wonder Carl is "Mad as Hell"!' So are we!

We wholeheartedly endorse Carl Paladino for Governor of New York.

Remember, every vote counts so if you are thinking of sitting the election out, Don't!!!!! Carl needs every single vote. If you want to defeat the corrupt machine in Albany, we urge you to vote for Carl Paladino on Tuesday, November 2nd.

P.E.T.A. ACTIVISTS VS BIKERS: GUESS WHO WON?

2010-10-29T08:18:00.001-07:00

What a wonderful coming together of two diverse groups! We need more gatherings where the animal activists are given warm welcomes like this one. This is why PETA usually protests older women wearing fur rather than bikers wearing leather.

Sounds to me like the old saying, "you mess with the bull, and you get the horns". Gee, I guess these characters thought that Bikers where going to be politically correct like the rest of the wimpy world.

--------------

Johnstown, PA (GlossyNews) - Local and State Police scoured the hills outside rural Johnstown, Pennsylvania, after reports of three animal rights activists going missing after attempting to protest the wearing of leather at a large motorcycle gang rally this weekend. Two others, previously reported missing, were discovered by fast food workers "duct taped inside fast food restaurant dumpsters," according to police officials.

"Something just went wrong,"said a still visibly shaken organizer of the protest. "Something just went horribly, horribly, wrong."The organizer said a group of concerned animal rights activist groups, "growing tired of throwing fake blood and shouting profanities at older women wearing leather or fur coats," decided to protest the annual motorcycle club event "in a hope to show them our outrage at their wanton use of leather in their clothing and motor bike seats." "In fact," said the organizer, "motorcycle gangs are one of the biggest abusers of wearing leather, and we decided it was high time that we let them know that we disagree with them using it. ergo, they should stop."

According to witnesses, protesters arrived at the event in a vintage 1960's era Volkswagen van and began to pelt the gang members with balloons filled with red colored water, simulating blood, and shouting "you're murderers" to passers by. This, evidently, is when the brouhaha began.

"They peed on me!!!" charged one activist. "They grabbed me, said I looked like I was French, started calling me 'La Trene' and duct taped me to a tree so they could pee on me all day!"

Still others claimed they were forced to eat hamburgers and hot dogs under duress. Those who resisted were allegedly held down while several bikers "farted on their heads."

Police officials declined comments on any leads or arrests due to the ongoing nature of the investigation; however, organizers for the motorcycle club rally expressed "surprise" at the allegations.

"That's preposterous,"said one high-ranking member of the biker organizing committee. "We were having a party, and these people showed up and were very rude to us. They threw things at us, called us names, and tried to ruin the entire event. So, what did we do? We invited them to the party! What could be more friendly than that? You know, just because we are all members of motorcycle clubs does not mean we do not care about inclusiveness. Personally, I think it shows a lack of character for them to be saying such nasty things about us after we bent over backwards to make them feel welcome."

When confronted with the allegations of force-feeding the activist's meat, using them as ad hoc latrines, leaving them incapacitated in fast food restaurant dumpsters, and 'farting on their heads,' the organizer declined to comment in detail. "That's just our secret handshake,"assured the organizer.

SEE PHOTO AT: http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_29573.php

JOHN WALLACE RADIO - ELECTION 2010: WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN ON NOV 2ND?

2010-10-28T20:49:00.001-07:00

AMERICAN POLITICS RADIO SHOW - SHOW REMINDER:

NEXT SHOW - (THIS FRIDAY) Oct 29th at 5:00PM EST

TOPIC: ELECTION 2010 - What's Going to Happen on November 2nd?

This week on American Politics, I will be talking about the upcoming Election on November 2nd. Is there a candidate for the US Senate, the House or for Governor that you would like to talk about or you are supporting? Are there some discusting campaign tactics you would like to bring to our attention? What do you think is going to happen on election day? Will President Obama change his direction if he loses the House and/or the Senate? Call in and let us know

-------------------

If you have specific questions or points to make, please call the show while it is on the air (646-200-0326). Remember, you can listen to the radio show while you are on the telephone. As always, Listeners are encouraged to call in.

You can also go to the Chat Room and text your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.

CALL IN NUMBER: (646-200-0326)

Click on the link below for more information about the show and or to listen to the show.

www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace

Regards,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
American Politics with John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com
Email: john@TeaPartyRep.com

JOHN WALLACE RADIO: WHY AMERICANS MUST STOP OBAMACARE NOW

2010-10-21T16:52:00.001-07:00

AMERICAN POLITICS RADIO SHOW - SHOW REMINDER:

NEXT SHOW - (THIS FRIDAY) Oct 22th at 5:00PM EST

GUEST AND TOPIC: WHY AMERICANS NEED TO STOP OBAMACARE!

My guest this week is Dr. Lee Kurisko, a nationally known medical professional, who will be presenting his views on ObamaCare. Could national health care be the the end of the finest medical system in the world?

Having practiced medicine on both sides of the border, Diagnostic Radiologist Lee Kurisko warns Americans not to sell out their liberty for the false promises of government-run health care, such as he experienced in his Canadian homeland. An engaging speaker and author of the timely new book, “Health Reform: The End of the American Revolution,” Kurisko presents a compelling case against government control of health care, and how personal freedom is lost under such a system. Health care costs are driven higher in the U.S. because of government intrusion in the free-market system. More government control will only worsen the problem—not fix it.

In Canada, lack of funding, antiquated equipment and physician shortages controlled by the Ministry of Health, made it impossible for Kurisko and his colleagues to deliver timely, quality care. Waiting lists for necessary tests and surgeries stretched for months, and people suffered and died needlessly. Kurisko deemed it the worst kind of immorality. In 2001, he moved to the United States which offers personal freedom to patients and physicians, and abundant, high quality, accessible care. Congress is now threatening that freedom with its proposed health reform legislation. As always, Listeners are encouraged to call in!

-------------------

NOTE TO THOSE WITHIN DRIVING DISTANCE OF ALBANY, NEW YORK:

Dr. Kurisko will be making a presentation on ObamaCare at the Marriott Hotel in Albany NY on Monday, October 25th at 7:30PM. There are a still a limited number of advance tickets available at only $5.00. Please Call 1-888-713-8087 to make your reservation, or visit the John Birch Society website at http://www.JBSNY.org

-------------------

If you have specific questions of my guest, please call the show while it is on the air (646-200-0326). You can listen to the radio show while you are on the telephone while you are waiting. Listeners are encouraged to call in.

You can also go to the Chat Room and text your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air. Remember, you can listen to the radio show while you are on the telephone.

CALL IN NUMBER: (646-200-0326)

Click on the link below for more information about the show and or to listen to the show.

www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace

Regards,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
American Politics with John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com
www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace
Email: john@TeaPartyRep.com

NANCY PELOSI, THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE, IS INSANE!

2010-10-11T21:02:00.000-07:00

Nancy Pelosi is insane! Sure, I believe that most Americans already know that. One look at her bulging glassy eyed, leering botox-riddled Joker face gives that away. Her career is filled with monumental fits of insanity, stupid remarks and way out ideas, but she keeps on getting elected by the dumbed down voters in California anyway. I think Ms. Pelosi's latest remarks, however, are proof that she is really insane.

In a recent interview with the press concerning unemployment in the USA, Nancy Pelosi said that "more food stamps and more unemployment insurance for Americans will actually grow the US economy" and lift it from the recession that Barack Obama has helped to worsen. Well, she really didn't say the part about Barack Obama making the economy worse. I added that part, but she did say the part about more food stamps and more unemployment insurance for Americans will actually grow the US economy.

Ms. Pelosi, that insane non-genius and all-around nut case analyst of the US economy and everything else financial, spoke to the press on October 6, 2010 in an attempt to answer remarks recently made by Newt Gingrich, who said that Republicans need to make a contrast between Democrats who promote food stamps as their economic policy, and Republicans who actually promote the useful concept called paychecks to grow the prosperity of Americans.

Ms. Pelosi responded to Gingrich’s assertion by admitting that, yes, Democrats are indeed the party of food stamps. Ms. Pelosi actually admitted that her party’s policy is to get as many people as possible on food stamps because she’s either totally ignorant about how economics works, or she really is crazy.

It has got to be the latter because any normal, sane human being would understand that food stamps helped by unemployment insurance will not grow the US economy!!

If Ms. Pelosi really believes what she is saying "that food stamps and unemployment insurance will grow the US economy," then she needs a "checkup from the neck-up" and her recent statements only help prove what Dr. Michael Savage has been saying for many, many years, which is that "liberalism is a mental disorder!"

JOHN WALLACE RADIO: ARE AMERICANS BEING POISONED BY GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS?

2010-09-30T22:08:00.001-07:00

AMERICAN POLITICS WITH JOHN WALLACE - RADIO SHOW

NEXT SHOW - THIS FRIDAY - OCT 1st at 5:00PM

TOPIC : CODEX ALIMENTARIUS: THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO SEE!

Although most Americans do not know it, they are eating food that is injected with foreign genes (GMOs), blasted with pesticides, irradiated beyond recognition, pasteurized, homogenized, scraped off a slaughterhouse floor, and it is making us sicker by the minute, and now international CODEX ALIMENTARIUS guidelines are about to set the minimum and maximum levels of so-called “nutrients” we are allowed to have. If it doesn’t meet the minimum international guidelines, just add a little more GMO such as golden rice, chock full of artificial inserted “vitamins” to the food supply and force feed it to the public via stealth, free trade sanctions and the SPS agreement, and by all means make sure that the upper nutrient level wouldn’t keep a hamster alive. And if a company or nation doesn’t meet Codex guidelines? Then it is creating a barrier to free trade and can be prosecuted under the law.

My guest this week is Marti Oakley, a farm and food activist, who will be talking about the dangers associated with genetically modified food, recent bogus federal food safety legislation and the gradual introduction of international regulations into our country that are making us sick and placing the American people in danger. If we are lucky, Barbara H. Peterson from FarmWars.com will also be joining us.

Why has 95% of all the soy beans grown in American been genetically modified without you knowledge? Would you eat genetically modified foods? What if you didn't know it was genetically modified?

If you have specific questions or an opinion of the subject, please call the show while it is on the air (646-200-03260) and/or email your questions or opinions to me from the Chat Room and I will read them on the air.

Click on the link below for more information about the show and or to listen to the show live.
www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace

If you, or a member of your organization, would like to be on the show, or you would like us to dedicate a show to a specific topic of interest, please email me at: john@TeaPartyRep.com

For Liberty,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
American Politics with John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com
www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace
Email: john@TeaPartyRep.com

JOHN WALLACE RADIO - THIS WEEK - THE WEEK IN REVIEW

2010-09-23T21:16:00.000-07:00

AMERICAN POLITICS RADIO SHOW - SHOW REMINDER:

NEXT SHOW - (THIS FRIDAY) at 5:00PM EST

As I return from 3 weeks away from internet radio, I will be reviewing some recent issues including the possible CIA links to the Mosque controversy in NYC; recent Tea party candidate successes; Harry Reid's Dream Act for Illegals; Obama's support for new Global Taxes; legalization of marijuana; The Republican Party's Pledge to America, Sarah Palin's comments about Barack Obama's unknown background, USA adoption of Codex Alimentarius, Tea Party candidate Carl Paladino's race for Governor of New York and a host of other issues. As usual, listeners are encouraged to call in.

If you have an opinion on any one of these subjects, or any other subject, please call the show while it is on the air (646-200-0326). You can listen to the radio show while you are on the telephone while you are waiting. You can also go to the Chat Room and text your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.

Click on the link below for more information about the show and or to listen to the show.

www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace

Remember, you can listen to the radio show while you are on the telephone.

If you, or a member of your organization, would like to be on the show, or you would like us to dedicate a show to a specific topic of interest, please email me at: John@TeaPartyRep.com

All shows are archived, so you can always find past shows on the internet.

For Liberty,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
American Politics with John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com
www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace
Email: john@TeaPartyRep.com

LIBERTYNEWS ON-LINE ENDORSES TEA PARTY CANDIDATE CARL PALADINO FOR GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK

2010-09-13T16:58:00.001-07:00

TOMORROW IS PRIMARY DAY - EVERY VOTE COUNTS

Recent polling for the Republican Primary in New York show that the race between Tea Party favorite Carl Paladino and Rick Lazio is a statistical dead heat. This means that every vote will count in the Primary.

Carl Paladino has been all over the state in the past few months talking to, and listening to the people. It's clear that politics in America, including New York, is changing and the message for small government, lower taxes and reform is lound and clear. The people's campaign for Carl Paladino stands on the edge of victory in the Republican Primary on Tuesday.

The efforts of the Liberty movement will be for naught unless the people use the power of their votes tomorrow to change Albany and give the people the honest government they deserve.

If you're sick of the career politicians ruining our state with their wild spending, vote on Tuesday!

If you're ready to stand up for your rights as taxpayers, vote on Tuesday!

If you're mad as hell at corruption and dysfunction in Albany, vote on Tuesday!

Your votes are the only thing that can make Albany finally listen to your voice, so make sure you exercise your rights as a citizen, this Tuesday, September 14th.

The polls will open at 6 AM in Erie, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland, Orange, and Putnam counties and New York City, and will remain open until 9 PM.

Polls open at 12 noon in all other counties and will remain open until 9 PM.

Don't let the baseless attacks against Carl Paladino by the liberal media, his opponents and corrupt political insiders distract you from the goal of cleaning up Albany, just like Gov. Chris Christie is doing in New Jersey. The crooks in Albany are scared at what is going to happen to them if Carl Paladino is elected in November and they are getting desperate.

He is also a strong supporter of the people's Second Amendment Rights; he is the Right to Life candidate and he is a strong supporter of emergency services.

Only the people of new York can turn Albany upside down and take out the trash, so please vote on Tuesday and encourage your friends to do the same.

We give our endorsements to Carl Paladino for Governor, Thomas Ognibene for Lieutenant Governor and Gary Berntsen for U.S. Senate (for Schumer's seat)

For Liberty,
John
_______________________
John Wallace
Chatham, NY
www.LibertyNewsOnLine.com

CARL PALADINO FOR GOVERNOR IN NY REPUBLICAN PRIMARY

2010-09-06T12:54:00.000-07:00

I NEED YOUR HELP:

As many of you know, I am very active in politics and have no hesitation to express my views and opinions on the issues. I'm writing this short note to let you know that I am a campaign volunteer for Carl Paladino, who is a candidate for Governor in the New York State Republican primary next Tuesday, September 14th.

Over the past several months, I have attended several public meetings with various Liberty groups in which Carl spoke passionately about the need to clean out the corruption in Albany and offered very specific solutions. He had to butt heads with the leadership of the Republican Party, but successfully petitioned his way onto the Sept. 14th GOP primary because of his strong grassroots support. Like the rest of us and by his own admission, he's not perfect. He plans to cut taxes by 10% and spending by 20% in his first year in office. He is not a career politician. He wants transparency in government and no more out of control spending. He also knows how to create jobs because he created almost 400 of them with his own business.

His opponent on the other hand, Rick Lazio, is a career politician who is pro-abortion and anti-Second Amendment rights. Rick Lazio is an insider who took a million dollar bonus from bank bailout funds, who is backed by the liberal New York Times and who offers no real solutions to the problems NY State faces.

I believe that it is very important that "We the People" become politically active in order to take back our out-of-control federal and state governments. The American people can no longer afford to sit on the sidelines. We must be active to make a difference. I truly believe that Carl Paladino is the only candidate currently running for Governor in New York who has the guts, fortitude, honesty and electibility to actually "clean house" in Albany and I am asking for your help.

I am asking you to join with me and help in any way you can to get Liberty minded people out to vote for Carl Paladino on Primary Day, September 14th. If you want more information about Carl's positions on the issues, please go to: www.PaladinoForThePeople.com

VOLUNTEERS NEEDED NOW TO GET THE VOTE OUT:

We need dedicated people to make telephone calls to their friends and neighbors, put signs on their lawns and other public places, hand out some phamplets to people and generally help out with what is needed, but we only have 7 days to accomplish this goal. WE NEED YOUR HELP NOW!!!!!!

I am the coordinator for Columbia County. If you are a Columbia County resident and want to help Carl win the Primary, we will be having a meeting on Wednesday evening at 7:00PM at a location to be determined in the county. This may be you last chance to get an outsider elected in New York State and remember, you do not have to be a Republican to help out, but you do have to be a Republican to vote in the Primary.

FOR COLUMBIA COUNTY RESIDENTS:
Please email me at: john@teaPartyRep.com to get involved now.

FOR PEOPLE OUTSIDE OF COLUMBIA COUNTY:
If you want to help and you live outside of Columbia County, please go to the Paladino Campaign website at: www.PaladinoForThePeople.com and click on the link to volunteer in your county.

REMEMBER: WE NEED YOUR HELP NOW!!!!!

Even if you can't help out as a volunteer, please make the time to vote for Carl on September 14th as only a small portion of voters actuall show up for the Primaries and every vote counts.

For Liberty,
John
___________________________
John Wallace
Chatham, New York
Email: john@TeaPartyrep.co
wwwTeaPartyRep.com

JOHN WALLACE RADIO: IS BARACK OBAMA A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN OF THE USA?

2010-08-26T20:44:00.001-07:00

THE RADIO SHOW IS THIS FRIDAY AT 5:00PM EST

New York Times bestselling author and the Senior Managing Director in the Financial Services Group at Gilford Securities, as well as a senior staff writer for WorldNetDaily.com, Dr. Jerome Corsi, will be my special guest this week on "American Politics with John Wallace" and we will be talking about Barack Obama's refusal to show his birth certificate to prove he is a natural born citizen. In an in the attempt to debunk the Obama birth-certificate controversy, the State Department has inadverently confirmed Obama was a dual citizen of the U.K. and the U.S. from 1961 to 1963 and a dual citizen of Kenya and the U.S. from 1963 to 1982, because his father was a Kenyan citizen when Obama was born in 1961. In a number of court cases challenging Obama's eligibility, dual citizenship has been raised as a factor that could compromise his "natural born" status under Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution. The cases argue dual citizenship would make Obama ineligible.

ABOUT MY GUEST: Jerome R. Corsi received a Ph.D. from Harvard University in political science in 1972. He is the author of the #1 New York Times bestselling books:

"The ObamaNation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality"

He is the co-author of "Unfit for Command:Swift Boat veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry".

He is also the author of "America For Sale," "The Late Great U.S.A." and "Why Israel Can't Wait"

If you have an opinion on this subject or have specific questions of my guest, on this or any other subject, please call the show while it is on the air (646-200-0326). You can listen to the radio show while you are on the telephone while you are waiting. You can also go to the Chat Room and text your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.

Remember, you can listen to the radio show while you are on the telephone.

CALL IN NUMBER: (646-200-0326)

Here's the link to the Internet Show:

If you, or a member of your organization, would like to be on the show, or you would like us to dedicate a show to a specific topic of interest, please email me at: John@TeaPartyRep.com

For Liberty,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
American Politics with John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com
www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace
Email: john@TeaPartyRep.com

VIDEO OF JOHN WALLACE SPEAKING AT A RALLY IN ALBANY NY

2010-08-23T20:24:00.001-07:00

Video of John Wallace, Oath Keeper, Speaking at the 10th Amendment Rally in Albany NY on August 7, 2010:

PART I (4 MINUTES)

PART II (7 MINUTES)

REPORT ON THE 10TH AMENDMENT IN ALBANY NEW YORK

2010-08-19T20:50:00.001-07:00

It was a beautiful, rain free day on August 7th at the Capitol Steps in Albany where freedom loving New Yorkers gathered in support of the United States Constitution, focusing on the 10th Amendment. The rally began as patriotic music, including songs by local bands the Ameros and American Spirit Unbroken, played while tables were set up by the speakers and candidates. Organizers, driven by the desire to spread the message of the importance of State's Rights in restoring our Republic and individual liberty, coordinated this event in six weeks with minimal experience and funding.

The rally was mainly promoted via internet and some radio announcements from Hudson, NY where many of the organizers originate. Traditionally, New York is a left-wing state, but this is a spark that will set afire many more people in the state toward stopping the Federal Government’s intrusion on our liberties.

Many outstanding speakers spoke with great zeal about states’ rights. Leonard Roberto, founder of Primary Challenge, was both MC and a speaker who implored the attendees to keep up the fight for freedom. He gave a brief history lesson comparing Christians of 2,000 years ago, whose lives were a testament of the truth and faith that they held within them and “they loved not their life unto the death” to patriots and our founding fathers of 200+ years ago. Our founding fathers believed we were endowed by our Creator with unalienable rights and that no legislature gave them to us and no legislature could take them away. They also gave up their lives willingly to secure freedom in their day.

Mr. Roberto says that it’s going to take brave, unselfish and determined patriots like the Christians of Jesus’ time and patriots such as our founding fathers to secure freedom in our day. Patriots who love freedom unto the death, who are willing to sacrifice their time, money, even their TVs - all, if necessary, are what’s needed to secure a free people.

The first speaker, Rick Montes, State Coordinator of New York Tenth Amendment Center, revved up the crowd by explaining how our founding fathers desired and set up the Federal Government so that it wouldn’t become a tyranny. They didn’t want a consolidated national government, but rather individual, sovereign states with only limited powers granted to the Federal Government. Which is why they included the 10th Amendment in the Bill of Rights. Mr. Montes also expounded on Nullification as a way a state can defy the Federal Government and do the will of the people of that state. He closed with a warning to those attending the rally to be vigilant and know what the Constitution says and also quoted from Patrick Henry, stating, “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.”

Tim Chichester of Columbia County told how the 17th Amendment affects our state sovereignty. Because of the 17th Amendment, it puts the US Senators’ allegiance with the Federal Government, as opposed to allegiance to the state. It allows the Federal Government to supersede the state government by imposing regulations and control over the state, instead of letting the state government run itself.

John Wallace, retired New York State Trooper and now Oath Keeper, as well as an American Politics Radio Show host, moved the crowd by boldly telling everyone where our rights come from – our Creator! He explained how under both Democratic and Republican administrations the Federal Government has increased its powers beyond its Constitutional limits. Mr. Wallace stated that in our 234 year history, certain generations of Americans have been called upon to defend liberty and it is our sacred duty to defend liberty for our children and our children's children. He said "it is a critical time in our county’s history because our liberty is in mortal danger and that we are the generation that must act; for this is our time to stand up and be counted – this is our time to join together as one united force to defend liberty in America."

Sprinkled in between the main speakers were some local candidates and one state-wide candidate: Deborah Busch (Assembly 104th District), Ted Danz (21st Congress District), Robert Domenici (NYS Senate 46th District), and Gary Berntsen (US Senate - NY). Each of the candidates conveyed the importance of state sovereignty, which resounded with those present who desire the State of New York to be restored to its former glory as a sovereign state.

A local Tea Party Activist, Tom Chandler, addressed the very important issue of racism which the enemies of freedom like to use to try to divide the freedom movement.

Bob Schulz, a long-time veteran of patriotic activism, concentrated on the Articles of Freedom, a document authored by the Continental Congress of 2009. This document is a 14 point plan to save the Constitution, the first point addressing state sovereignty.

The Keynote Speaker was Sheriff Richard Mack of Arizona, a now retired sheriff who successfully overturned the Brady Bill during the Clinton Administration. Back in 1994, the Federal Government threatened to arrest sheriffs if they didn’t enforce the Brady Bill. In 1997, Sheriff Mack sued the Federal Government on the 10th Amendment and won! This was a grand victory toward freedom for all of us! The case upheld the sovereignty of the state over the Federal Government.

Sheriff Mack said, “The greatest threat to our God given Constitutional American liberty is our own Federal Government.” The Sheriff mentioned that James Madison said that the states need to erect barriers against the encroaching of the national authority. He also said that when the Federal Government becomes too oppressive, the county Sheriff is America’s last stand. It is the sheriffs’ duty to protect us against enemies both foreign and domestic.

The founding fathers required public officials to take an oath of allegiance to the Constitution because they wanted to protect the rights of the people. If our elected officials just kept their oaths, we’d get our freedom back! The Sheriff noted that Judge Scalia, US Supreme Court Justice, ruled that state legislatures are not subject to federal direction. The Constitution is supreme, not the Federal Government!

The people of New York can stop National Health Care by making the Federal Government irrelevant! Also, the Federal Government has the responsibility (one of its limited powers), to protect our borders, something they are simply refusing to do. The Mack/Prince vs. the US lawsuit declares: “But the Constitution protects us from our own best intentions: It divides power among sovereigns and among branches of government precisely so that we may resist the temptation to concentrate power in one location as an expedient solution to the crisis of the day.”

Sheriff Mack closed by asking, “Can we, ordinary citizens, really make a difference?" He answered it with a quote by John Quincy Adams, “Duty is ours, results are God’s.”

John Wallace once again addressed the excited and empowered crowd and closed the rally by administering the Oath Keepers Oath to all those present who wished to become honorary Oath Keepers. Mr. Wallace ending with three words: Freedom! Freedom! Freedom! as those in attendance enthusiastically shouted after him.

Many thanks goes out to the organizers who unselfishly gave countless hours of their time and energy to make this rally happen and to all the speakers and candidates, as well as to fellow New Yorkers who came to learn more about the 10th Amendment and stand in unison with a very important message to Washington and Albany:

"OBEY THE CONSTITUTION!"

-----------

This report was submitted by Catherine - for a Better Future

STATE SOVEREIGNTY MOVEMENT IS COMING TO NY STATE ON AUG 5TH

2010-07-28T10:00:00.001-07:00

THE STATE SOVEREIGNTY MOVEMENT IS COMING TO NEW YORK STATE ON AUGUST 7TH

There has been a movement growing in America over the past two years as the people have come to realize that the ever growing Federal Government is becoming more and more intrusive into their daily private lives and that their personal Liberty and individual Freedoms are in danger of being severely limited or lost all together. Because of this, state legislatures in a growing number of states have recently passed State Sovereignty bills designed to reaffirm their constitutional guaranteed rights of sovereignty under the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

The 10th Amendment, which is part of the Bill of Rights, states:

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

These 10th Amendment resolutions are intended to carry a message: States' rights and the rights of the American people are being trampled on by their own federal government when that government is supposed to be a limited, servant government whose main purpose it to protect the unalienable rights of the American people. Unfortunately, for many, many decades, the federal government has unconstitutionally expanded its powers by passing legislation, creating agencies and imposing mandates on the states, such as the recent health care reform bill and economic recovery bills, that they have absolutely no power under the Constitution to do. The Constitution was written in such a way as to clearly limit the power of the federal government to specific "enumerated powers." All other powers are retained and reserved to the individual States or to the people.

In 2009, thirty-seven state legislatures introduced 10th Amendment sovereignty measures and by the end of the year, seven state legislatures -- Alaska, Idaho, Louisiana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Tennessee -- passed such legislation.

Already in 2010, sovereignty resolutions have been introduced in another 17 states and now the first public rally in support of the U.S. Constitution and New York State Sovereignty is coming to the State Capital in Albany New York on August 7, 2010 at 12:noon.

Several Liberty and Tea Party groups in New York state have come together to organize the rally, including members from Primary Challenge, Campaign for Liberty, 912 group, Oath Keepers, the 10 Amendment Center and others. Many grassroots candidates for federal, state and local offices have already indicated they will be there to show their support for the 10th Amendment. Many elected Sheriffs from both New York State and some surrounding states are expected to attend to hear the keynote speaker, retired Sheriff Richard E. Mack of Arizona, talk about the important role of the Sheriff in the State Sovereignty movement and in protecting the individual and unalienable rights of American citizens in their counties.

The American people are being invited to join in solidarity with their fellow citizens to come together to show support of the 10th Amendment with one single message for their elected and appointed officials in both Washington DC and Albany: "OBEY THE CONSTITUTION."

RALLY INFORMATION:

When: Saturday, August 7, 2010 12:Noon

Where:
State Capitol Building
Eagle Street & State St
Albany, NY 12207

Keynote Speaker - Sheriff Richard Mack
Host Speaker - Lenny Roberto President and Founder of Primary Challenge
Guest Speaker - Rick Montes - NYS 10th Amendment Center
Guest Speaker - John Wallace - Oath Keeper from the Hudson Valley/Capital Region
and Many Grassroots Candidates for federal and state offices

For more details about the event, please visit:
http://www.10thOnThe7th.com

Click on the following link for a copy of the Press Release in word format and pass it along to your friends, personal contacts and local media:
http://www.10thOnThe7th.com/PressRelease-StateSovereigntyRally-2010-0728.doc

CONTACT INFORMATION:

John Wallace
Chatham, New York
Tel: 518-392-7062
Email: john@TeaPartyrep.com
www.10thOnThe7th.com

MAHATMA GANDHI AND THE AMERICAN TEA PARTY MOVEMENT

2010-07-17T15:12:00.001-07:00

The famous Indian Philosopher Mahatma Gandhi once said: “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

STEP ONE: "First they ingore you"

When the Tea Party rallies were first held back in 2008, the socialist American Press ignored us. A million people marched on Washington and in many other paces in the country, and they still ignored us or underreported the number of people. I guess they thought if they ignored us long enough, we would just go away.

STEP TWO: "Then they laugh at you"

When we didn't go way, but rather we continued to demonstrate in the streets and voicend pour concerns for Liberty, Freedom and Sovereignty at Town Hall meetingsd, the progressives and the press began calling us Tea Baggers, Birthers, Thruthers and a whole lot of other names. The nightime TV hosts began to make fun of us and anyone else even slightly associated with the Tea Party Movement.

STEP THREE: "Then they fight you"

What we are seeing now is the beginning of a coordinated attack against the Tea party movement. The NAACP is just one organization that has recently joined in the attack. The FEC has filed a lawsuit against the Campaign for Liberty for posting the congressional voting records (public information) of two sitting Democratic House members. The Progressive-socialists have tried to crash our rallies and held up signs with derogatory racial and ethnic words on them in an attempt to destroy the movement. Even members of the Black Caucus made up stories that members of the Tea Party cursed at them, called them niggers and spat at them. This was all found out to be a lie. People took pictures of the incident and the Tea parties were cleared.

Now LaRaza, ACORN, the new Black Panthers, SEIU union locals and a wide variety of special interest groups, most of whom suvive on federal government handouts and Establishment non-profit organizational grants, are stepping up their anti-TeaParty efforts and have even tried to disrupt our rallies. We have reached that most important point in our movement to restore our Republic, but the worst is yet to come. The fact is that the Tea Party Movement, under many different names and organizations, is growing and we are becoming more of a threat to the Establishment Elite and their socialist and globalist agenda.

The road ahead will not be easy and the traitorous enemies within our own country are very cunning, unscrupulous and have unlimited resources. But they are no match for an army of united and determined citizens like us who are prepared to fight the hard battles that lie ahead, as our Founders did 234 years ago, and we WILL Prevail.

The year 2008 was the beginning of the Tea Party movement. It is a journey that will leave future generations of Americans a legacy of individual freedom and liberty, a first class education system, a clean environment, a strong and sovereign America with an honest, limited government that will offer unlimited opportunities for their future. For there is no doubt: WE WILL PREVAIL!

STEP FOUR: "and then you win!"

No other comments are necessary.

RALLY FOR THE US CONSTITUTION AND NYS SOVEREIGNTY - AUG 7TH

2010-07-16T19:49:00.001-07:00

A Rally by Liberty Groups in Support of the U.S. Constitution and New York State Sovereignty is being held in Albany, NY - August 7th

All Freedom and Liberty-loving Americans are invited to a rally in support of the U.S. Constitution and New York State Sovereignty. Many grassroots candidates from the area, many Sheriff’s from New York State and other states, Tea Party groups, Oath Keeper groups, 912 groups, Campaign for Liberty groups, We the People and many other Liberty groups will be there in support of the 9th and 10th Amendment. We are inviting all other liberty groups from New York and nearby states that would like to join New York in solidarity, with all of us coming together under the 10th Amendment with one single message for our elected and appointed officials in both Washington and Albany:

"OBEY THE CONSTITUTION!"

When: Saturday, August 7, 2010 12:00 PM

Where:
State Capitol Building
Eagle Street & State St
Albany, NY 12207

A RALLY OF THE PEOPLE:

● Keynote Speaker - Sheriff Richard Mack
● Host Speaker - Lenny Roberto President and Founder of Primary Challenge
● Guest speaker - John Wallace - Oath Keeper from the Hudson Valley/Capital Region
● & Many Grassroots Candidates for fedetal and statewide offices

For more details and to make a donation to help put this together, please visit:
http://www.10thonthe7th.com (10th on the 7th).

A limited number of table spaces are available for Liberty Groups and/or Candidates.

For Liberty,

John Wallace
www.TeaPartyRep.com

GROUND ZERO MOSQUE PROTEST: WHERE WAS THE AMERICAN PRESS?

2010-07-11T09:09:00.001-07:00

On June 6, 2010, the aniversary of D-Day, almost ten thousand people showed up in lower Manhattan to protest the building of a mosque near the site of the Radical Islamic Terrorist attack on the World Trade Center at Ground Zero on 9-11.

Did anyone see coverage of this event on national TV? Did the government-media cover the event? Apparently not! While thousands of Americans stood up against Radical Islam in New York City, not one major network sent a satellite truck or camera crew to this event. Without bloggers and the internet, this newsworthy event would have remained unknown to the public and history.

Although not legally binding, the plan for the construction of the mosque was given preliminary overwhelming approval by a local New York City community board in May. Protestors at the June 6th event expressed hope that their public protest and outcry would change the hearts and minds of community board members and ultimately keep the mosque from being built.

The protest rally was a multi-ethnic, multi-racial coalition of almost ten thousand people who are opposed to Islamic violence and intolerance who rallied at the site of the World Trade Center in New York City. It was not some small group of anti-Muslim protestors. 9/11 families were joined by immigrants from India, Russia, Egypt, Israel, Africa, Iran and Europe to show opposition to the construction of a mega-mosque at Ground Zero. Others flew in from overseas to speak or just to share their particular ethnic communities' experiences at the hands of Radical Muslims.

There were parents and spouses of many of the firefighters killed on 9/11. The rally took place just a short walk from FDNYC Ladder 10 Firehouse, where their loved ones were stationed for duty that terrible day. Ladder 10 lost seven firefighters on 9-11.

The crowd overflowed the police barrier enclosures that ran the full length of two city blocks.

Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller are the founders of STOP ISLAMIZATION OF AMERICA, which sponsored the rally. Ms. Geller is a citizen journalist and blogger who runs the human rights web site Atlas Shrugs. Mr. Spencer is the author of several books on Islam and head of the influential web site Jihad Watch.

Speaking to the American people gathered at the rally, Pamela Geller said:

"Ground Zero is a war memorial, Ground Zero is a burial ground. We are asking for sensitivity. It is unconscionable to build a shrine to the very ideology that inspired the jihadist attacks at Ground Zero, right there. We are asking the imam Rauf and Daisy Khan to be sensitive. For mutual respect and mutual understanding that is demanded of us every day. There is a hair-trigger sensitivity in the Muslim world, you can't run the cartoons, you can't say Mohammed, this is offensive. This is an offensive mosque."

"To build a shrine, an Islamic flag of conquest on the sacred ground the cherished site, of a conquered land. This is historic, this is Islamic history. It's what they do. The St. Sofia in Turkey, the al-Quds, at the holiest Jewish site in Israel. Not here. This is where we take a stand. We must take a stand. We must say no. "

Geller continued: "I do not believe that the landmarks commission controlled by Mayor Bloomberg, is going to stop this mosque. It's not going to happen. Here's Omar Muhamedi, on his human rights council, a CAIR lawyer, who sued the airlines and the Jane and John Does that saw something and said something on those airplanes, if you remember. That's who's on his human rights commission. It ain't gonna happen with Bloomberg. We have to make it happen. You have to get involved."

Organizers say the man behind the mosque - Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf - is not the man of peace he claims to be.

"He says he advocates for tolerance, but in his book he advocates for Sharia law which is radically intolerant," said Pamela Gellar. "We have no idea where the funding is coming from. We know his father built an Islamic Center on 96th street and was funded by 49 Muslim countries. Who's funding this $50 million monster? We want to know."

Several members of families who lost loved ones in the World Trade Center attacks on September 11, 2001, were also among the protestors. They displayed photos of their family members who died. They said building a mosque so close to their loved ones graves is an insult.

"This is my only son," said Eileen Tallon, who lost her son in the attack. "He was a firefighter and he went into rescue people that day. I'm upset about the building of the mosque, because Muslim terrorists murdered my son and 3,000 Americans at this site."

"Such was the violence on 9-11 that my brother's remains were never found," said Christina Regenhard said. "He was killed by Islamist and now they want to build a mosque on his grave. Their victory will be complete."

"The leader of the mosque is a 'bad guy' as we say in New York," the slain man's father, Albert Regenhard, added. "His father was a member of Muslim Brotherhood. These are the groups that include Hamas, Hezbollah, al Qaeda."

Immigrants Join Protest

Many of the protestors were immigrants, including Russian Jews, Arab Christians and Indians who love American freedoms and who fear the growing Islamization of America is slowly eroding that liberty.

"We are very happy. America has given us freedom of religion, but we do not want to destroy this country! Islam wants to destroy this country that's the big difference between them and us," said Narain Kataia, an Indian American.

The proposed mosque is slated to be built in the old Burlington Coat Factory building, just 600 feet from where the towers fell. Mosque supporters say their hope is to bring something good out of 9-11.

But for people like Lee Henson - who lost his son, daughter-in-law and granddaughter that day - a mosque near Ground Zero is unacceptable.

"They were on United Airlines Flight 175," Henson said. "My son called, he said, 'Don't worry Dad - it'll be quick.' I heard 'Oh my God, oh my God, oh my God' - then I looked at the TV screen and saw the plane hit the tower."

It is hoped that the people of New York City and the rest of America can prevent the building of a gigantic mosque at Ground Zero. This is hallowed ground for it is soaked with the blood of the victims of Radical Islamic terror. Building a mosque on ground containing Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Buddist and even Muslims' blood is exactly what the the Radical Islamic terrorist want. It will be a giving Radical Islam a clear propaganda symbol of another victory over America at the expense of the victims and their families!

Remember, there is not a single Islamic country in the world where Christians, Jews and Non-Muslims are not discriminated against in some fashion. They are restricted in their religious worship, not allowed to build their own churches or temples, and even tortured or killed for their religion.

I believe that Americans have already showed enough tolerance and hospitality to Muslims who have moved to this country. They can have their Mosques, they can have their freedom and their rights like every other US citizen or resident alien, but they should not be able to build a 'victory mosque' so close to the hallowed burial ground of so many Americans.

We wouldn't let someone build a US Calvery Memorial on the burial ground of 'Native Americans', then why would we allow a structure be built on the burial ground of so many Americans of different heritages, by people of the very religion that killed them.

The American people are starting to wake up to the dangers of Radical Islam in this country. Maybe it's also time that some American political leaders develop backbones, shed their political correctness, and start to stand up to Radical Islam, and just say NO!

Let's also hope that the American press develops backbones as well, and starts giving equal coverage to the average Americans who, for the first times in their lives, are protesting against the idiotic actions of their federal, state and local govenments.

John Wallace
www.NYOathKeeper.com

LIBERTY IN AMERICA: IS TIME RUNNING OUT?

2010-07-02T09:06:00.001-07:00

A short reminder about the 'Free" presentation pointing out the increasing threats to our Liberty and individual freedoms. Theese threats are not coming from some foreign power, but rather they are coming from our own elected officials in the federal government who no longer represent the American people.

Date: July 6th - Tuesday evening

Time: 7:00PM to 8:00PM (followed by Short Q&A period)

Place: Saratoga/Wilton Elks
1 Elks Lane
Saratoga, NY 12866
584-2585

The presentation is being hosted by the Upstate Conservative Coalition.

Guest Speaker: John Wallace, of Chatham NY will be talking about the dangers to America's individual freedoms and liberty as a result of an ever growing and more intrusive federal government. He will show how that growing danger is directly linked to the unconstitutional actions of the federal government over many decades, under both Democrat and Republican administrations. He will show that time may indeed be running out on our Freedoms and Liberty, unless we are prepared to do something about it.

Note; This presentation is designed as an introduction for those American citizens interested in finding out out a little more about what is going on in America today. It is not for those who are already well versed in the issues, but you can always bring along a friend.

If you have friends who do not know where their rights come from, how we are gradually losing our Freedoms and Liberty and how the key points of the Communist Manifesto are gradually being implemented in America, please bring them to this fast moving and very informative presentation. It is not for people who already know what's going on. It is for the new recruits in the fight to restore our constitutional Republic.

The presentation will cover the following topics, and maybe a few others:

Origins of our Unalienable Natural Rights
Rights vs Privileges
Citizens Under attack from a hundred different directions
Some Questions and some Obvious Answers - or are they?
Some important definitions we all should know
The Heritage of Liberty
The meaning of the Bill of Rights
Who created the government and who can change it?
Republic vs Democracy
Has a State of Emergency existed in USA since 1933?
10 Main Points of the Communist Manifesto and the USA
Continental Congress 2009
Current Constitutional Violations by the Federal Government
New World Order - Real or just a Conspiracy Theory?
The Federal Reserve
Threats to National Sovereignty
Origins of Gun and Marriage Licenses
Government NewSpeak
Closing the Gate on our Freedoms
A Plan of Action
Meet local Liberty Groups

for more information, contact Ben Potiker at 518-461-7728 or email:
upstateconservativecoalition@gmail.com

or contact John Wallace at 518-392-7062 or email: john@TeaPartyRep.com

meetup page http://www.meetup.com/Upstate-Conservative-Coalition/
homepage http://upstateconservatives.org/

Learn more here:
http://www.meetup.com/OathKeepers-NewYork/calendar/13926503/

For Liberty,

John Wallace
www.TeaPartyRep.com

BARACK OBAMA AND THE 'EMPTY SUIT SYNDROME'

2010-06-22T17:07:00.001-07:00

I believe all of us at one time or another have either worked for someone or have known someone who suffered from what is commonly called the “Empty Suit Syndrome” or ESS. The term “Empty Suit Syndrome” appeared many years ago in the world of big business and big government and it is commonly used to describe a person, (usually a man, but it can also be a woman), who is usually fairly good looking, who wears stylish clothes, who speaks very well and who generally appears to others to be intelligent and professional, but its really just an illusion.

People with ESS are often underestimated by their colleagues, but they still manage to get ahead in big business and big government because they are really good at what they do. They have the ability to convince their supervisors or even the organization’s CEO that they are exceptional and very valuable assets to the organization. When discussing projects they are working on, they always use the terms “me” or “I” and purposely ignore the contributions of others. Although they usually do not contribute anything of value, they are always there to take credit for the work and look good to the bosses. That’s how they get promoted. People with ESS also tend to have some sort of well connected benefactor, either within or outside of the organization who provides some degree of protection in case they are found out.

People with ESS go to all the organizational and industry luncheons and dinners and always make a point of talking to their own bosses, influential industry or government figures, or anybody else who they believe can advance their careers and they are able to do this with laser-like focus. They are outwardly charming, witty, personable and confident, particularly when they are in the company of someone who can help their career. They are the ones who know everybody in the industry and they make it a point to meet and greet anyone they think is important. At some point, however, they move into the upper echelons of big business or big government and that’s when people start to suspect that the person may have ESS or the “Empty Suit Syndrome.”

In large organizations, office politics, personal contacts combined with clever and sometimes underhanded career tactics will often compensate for the incompetence of the person with ESS. In some cases, people suffering from ESS manage to make it to the very top of big business or big government organizations without having really done anything to justify it. No accomplishments, no management skills, no expertise; just politics, schmoozing, many rounds of golf and important personal contacts. All will go smoothly until there is a serious crisis. That’s when everyone finds out that the person with ESS is just an “empty suit,” with no substance, no expertise, no competence and a strong desire to distance himself from any potential problems and controversies, usually at the expense of others.

Let’s take a quick look at the career of Barack Obama and see if he has ESS and how he made it to the top. He was born in (we don’t know because the records were sealed), he went to Columbia University and Harvard Law School (how did he do? – we don’t know – all the records are sealed), he became a State Senator in Illinois (never wrote a piece of legislation and never voted for or against anything controversial), he became a US Senator (never wrote a single piece of legislation), and then he became President of the United States. The big question is: Who are the people behind the curtain who helped him get where he is today? He surely didn’t get where he is today because of personal accomplishments. On paper, he really doesn’t have much of a resume that would qualify him for even a mid-level executive management position, not to mention the fact that most of his personal records have been sealed and very little of what he includes in his resume could be verified by potential employer.

On April 20th, 2010, there was an explosion on BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil drilling platform in the Gulf of Mexico. Within 24 hours the Coast Guard informed the White House that at least 8,000 barrels of oil were escaping into the ocean. Less than three days later, Mr. Obama was warned that the spill could quickly exceed the environmental damage caused by the Exxon Valdez wreck back in 1989. This is definitely the worst environmental crisis that has ever faced this nation and the actions of Mr. Obama in handling this crisis will not only reveal his essential character, but we will also learn how he will act or perform in a crisis.

From the first days of this catastrophic ecological crisis of the Gulf oil spill, we have seen an astounding level of incompetence, political opportunism and stretching of truth not only from Mr. Obama himself, but also from a good part of his administration. In true “Empty Suit Syndrome” fashion, Mr. Obama at first tried to distance himself from the crisis by ignoring it. He continued to attend political fundraisers, played golf (at least 7 times), hosted basketball and football teams, listened to a Paul McCartney concert at the White House and delivered many speeches on a variety of subjects. It would be two weeks and a couple of negative articles about his performance appearing in the press, before Mr. Obama would find the time to go to Louisiana.

When Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindahl declared a state of emergency in his state and begged federal officials for permission to build a massive network of sand berms to contain damage to the state’s beaches, it took Mr. Obama and his administration about a month to respond and they only gave permission to build 2 percent of the berms requested.

When confronting a crisis that they cannot solve, presidents usually have two distinct choices:

1. Take the “Empty Suit Syndrome” approach by distracting the peoples’ attention to other issues even at the risk of appearing to be unconcerned or uninvolved in the crisis, or

2. Take the “Leadership” approach and focus on the crisis to prove that you care and are working hard to resolve it.

Rather that taking the Leadership approach and concentrating on solving the crisis, Mr. Obama has chosen to take the “Empty Suit Syndrome” approach by using the crisis as an opportunity to push new “Cap and Tax” energy and comprehensive immigration reform legislation. Neither action has anything to do with stopping the gushing of oil in the Gulf of Mexico. His seeming lack of ability to deal with this crisis says an awful lot about his lack of management experience. He sent out lawyers and threatened lawsuits to solve the problem, rather than sending in the experts and accepting early offers of help from other countries that had the experience and equipment to help solve the problem.

Mr. Obama’s actions thus far are proof positive that community organizers and part-time law instructors simply do not have the qualifications and experience necessary to handle oil spills or any other major crises. This president has also surrounded himself with people like himself, progressive socialists from the world of academia, the legal profession and various social justice community organizations. Unfortunately, many of these appointees have always had the time to sit back, analyze and critique problems, and criticize others from a safe distance. Very few, if any of them, have had any real life experience in dealing with serious, crisis situations. I not only suspect that Mr. Obama may have ESS, but it looks like a good part of his key administration staff has ESS as well.

Let’s hope Mr. Obama learns from this experience and is able to shed the “Empty Suit Syndrome.” In the meantime, until this oil spill is contained, we need this president to concentrate on the crisis. No more golfing, no more baseball games, no more Paul McCartney concerts, no more parties or entertaining sports teams at the White House, no more demonizing BP, no more threatening lawsuits, no more distractions from doing his job and protecting the American people.

JOHN WALLACE RADIO: THE BP OIL SPILL IN THE GULF OF MEXICO

2010-06-17T20:12:00.001-07:00

AMERICAN POLITICS RADIO SHOW - SHOW REMINDER:

NEXT SHOW - (THIS FRIDAY) at 5:00PM EST

TOPIC: THE BP OIL SPILL IN THE GULF OF MEXICO

We are witnessing the increasing breadth and depth of the disaster caused by the explosion of a BP oil well in the Gulf of Mexico. As this tragedy continues to unfold, millions of Americans are asking themselves "why is the Obama administration dragging its heels in getting the clean-up efforts moving?" Why, indeed? Could this tragic accident be just the crisis they need to try and ram another piece of horrible legislation down our throats? If the Obama administration can pull it off, the "Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act of 2010" (S.B. 1733) will be the largest tax increase in American history at a time when the unemployment rate stands at 10.2% And to top it off, last week Senator Mitch McConnell said from the floor of the Senate that BP lobbyists played a significant part in writing Cap-n-Trade bill now before them! Mr Obama seems to have no problem swimming with corporations if it furthers his ideologically driven agenda, contrary to his populist rhetoric. Also, this oil spill may be more dangerous than we are being told with more and more fissure cracks being discovered in the area that are also leaking oil. Could the oil rig have been sabotaged? Please call in and give us your thoughts.

If you have specific questions, on this or any other subject, please call the show while it is on the air (646-200-0326) and or email your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.

Click on the link below for more information about the show and or to listen to the show.

www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace

If you, or a member of your organization, would like to be on the show, or you would like us to dedicate a show to a specific topic of interest, please email me at: John@TeaPartyRep.com

For Liberty,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
American Politics with John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com
www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace
www.LibertyNewsOnLine.com
Email: john@TeaPartyRep.com

AN OBAMA CITIZENSHIP CASE CONTINUES IN MILITARY COURT

2010-06-13T09:10:00.000-07:00

Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution clearly states that "a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States , at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; The constitution makes it abundantly clear that there is a difference between a natural born citizen and a citizen of the US. All citizens are NOT natural born. John A. Bingham, chief framer of 14th amendment wrote: “every human being born within the United States of parents [plural] not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of the Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.”

Earlier on 2010, decorated active duty Army medical officer, Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin called upon his chain of command and his Congressional delegation to force President Obama to release his original birth certificate. He is the highest ranking officer to go public over this controversy and in late February, was notified that he is subject to near-term deployment to Afghanistan.

His military orders include a requirement that he (LTC Lakin) provide "copies of his birth certificate." LTC Lakin is prepared to provide a certified copy of his certification of vital record that lists his birth hospital, physician's name and other key information. He has provided this document for many other required processes, such as his commissioning into the military as an officer, and his marriage license.

LTC Lakin has explained to his superiors that he cannot understand how his Oath of Office to protect and defend the Constitution does not allow military officers to pursue proof of eligibility from the Commander-in-Chief. In fact, efforts on his part to seek affirmation of the President's constitutional eligibility have been met with legal evasions. Yet in an open and free society, and especially given Obama's governmental "transparency" initiative, many American citizens are demanding to know the truth. So when the White House launched its transparency initiative online last year, and the website was instantly swamped with emails demanding release of Obama's original birth certificate, it was significant that the website’s assurance to answer any question was quickly removed.

LTC Lakin’s refusal to obey orders (including his deployment orders) put him at risk of court-martial. I think the average American would believe that it is wrong for an officer to be punished for asking a straightforward question merely because no one in the military hierarchy or on Capitol Hill is willing to provide a substantive answer (members of Congress have the obligation of representing constituents and also are sworn to uphold the Constitution).

At least one Tennessee Congressional office (Congressman Zach Wamp) forwarded LTC Lakin’s inquiry to the Department of Defense; the Army responded by letter to Rep. Wamp indicating that LTC Lakin's Article 138 complaint (a legal avenue for redress allowed service members for grievances against commanding officers) was deficient and that "the President as Commander-in-Chief is not a commanding officer for the purposes of Article 138 and therefore, no complaint against him may be addressed through this procedure." Yet another representative from the Volunteer State (Tennessee) Marsha Blackburn, co-sponsored legislation introduced by Congressman Bill Posey to require candidates to fix the problem of the lack of a formal process for vetting candidates for “natural born” eligibility.

The Western Journalism Center previously released an authoritative explanation of the Obama birth controversy that helps to explain the confusion on Capitol Hill which revolves mostly around Obama's online Certification of Live Birth (COLB):

“The Certification of Live Birth is not a copy of the original birth certificate. It is a computer-generated document that the state of Hawaii issues on request to indicate that a birth certificate of some type is ‘on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.’ And there is the problem. Given the statutes in force in 1961, the Certification of Live Birth proves nothing unless we know what is on the original birth certificate. There are several legal areas (involving ethnic quotas and subsidy) for which the state of Hawaii up until June 2009 did not accept its computer-generated Certification of Live Birth as sufficient proof of birth - or parentage - in Hawaii. Why should the citizens of the United States be content with lower standards for ascertaining the qualifications of their President?”

The Obama campaign is to a large degree responsible for the birthplace controversy by at first claiming that Obama was born at Queens Hospital and, at another time, claiming that he was born at Kapioliani Hospital. These conflicting assertions, combined with reports of his paternal grandmother's insistence to an interviewer that he was born in Kenya; and the break-in to the Obama passport file at the State Department (at least one news report alleged the file was cauterized) by an employee of The Analysis Corp., a firm headed by one of Obama's top advisers (John Brennan) have all contributed to escalating demands for Obama to document his "natural born" citizenship status.

Additionally, the Ambassador to the US from Kenya (Peter Ogego) asserted in a radio interview in November 2008 that the President was born in Kenya. A Kenyan Anabaptist minister also provided an affidavit, attesting to a conversation with a civil employee of the Kenyan Government, a Principal Registrar, who confirmed Obama’s birth in Kenya on August 4, 1961, but said his file was classified.

I believe that Mr. Obama should release his original birth certificate and put an end to relentless speculation over whether he meets the Constitutional fitness test for the nation's highest office. Original documentation for 1961 from the hospital or Department of Health can resolve this point without in any way compromising Obama's privacy or subjecting him to the danger of identity theft.

A few days ago, Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin waived his right to a preliminary hearing that had been scheduled for June 11, 2010. Lieutenant Colonel Lakin has steadfastly refused the army deployment orders based on the fact President Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States, is ineligible for the office of President and therefor has no right to be the Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. military. The case will now procede directly to a General Court martial.

Saying that the Army has made it "impossible for me to present a defense" at the Article 32 "preliminary hearing" previously scheduled for June 11, 2010, Lt. Colonel Terrence Lakin has officially waived that proceeding. Therefore, the case will move inexorably on to a General Court Martial. The punishment for the charges filed against LTC Lakin carry a maximum term of four years in the penitentiary.

Lakin expects the trial to be held in the early fall, but this has yet to be determined. The next step will be the formal referral of the charges by Lakin's Commanding General, Major General Carla Hawley-Bowland, followed by his arraignment before a Military Judge, both of which are expected before the end of June.

Lakin, through his legal defense team, requested the testimony of Dr. Chiyome Fukino of the Hawaii Dept. of Health, and all of that agency's records that exist concerning the president's birth. Lakin had also requested the testimony of the custodians of records of, and the records relating to Obama's admission and financial aid that exist, of the Punahou School, Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School.

All these requests were also summarily denied, leaving Lakin without any ability to mount a defense at the hearing. However, in that this hearing was preliminary in nature in the first place, Lakin will renew his requests to the Military Judge at the appropriate time.

Let's see if the Army drops the charges against LTC Lakin, and cancels his deployment orders, so that our imposter President does not have to produce his birth certificate.

--------------------------------

Lakin also released a new 5-minute video on Youtube explaining why he believes there are reasonable arguments that President Obama is Constitutionally ineligible to serve as Commander-in- Chief. The video can be viewed at http://www.safeguar dourconstitution .com/video2. html.

The video is being released under the auspices of the American Patriot Foundation, a non-profit group incorporated in 2003 to foster appreciation and respect for the U.S. Constitution, in the one month since establishing a fund to provide a legal defense to LTC Lakin, has received generous donations from more than 1,200 separate individuals. Further details are available on the Foundation's website, www.safeguardourcon stitution.com

American politics with John Wallace - Open Mic Friday

2010-06-09T19:49:00.001-07:00

AMERICAN POLITICS RADIO SHOW - SHOW REMINDER:

NEXT SHOW - (THIS FRIDAY) at 5:00PM EST (June 11th)

TOPIC: OPEN MIC FRIDAY

Every once in awhile, I host an "Open Mic Friday" where I open the telephone lines so people can call in and talk to me and the listeners about what's on mind. I will also discuss some topics like the Tea Party's effect on the recent primary victories, the bailout of Greece with your money, Israel's right to defend itself using a blockade of Gaza, the danger Electromagnetic Pulse Weapons pose to America, the effect of the Arizona Immigration Law on Illegal Aliens who seem to be fleeing the state snd a host of other issues. As always, listeners are encouraged to call in, ask questions and speak their mind.

If you have specific questions, on this or any other subject, please call the show while it is on the air (646-200-0326) and or email your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.

Click on the link below for more information about the show and or to listen to the show.

www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace

If you, or a member of your organization, would like to be on the show, or you would like us to dedicate a show to a specific topic of interest, please email me at: John@TeaPartyRep.com

For Liberty,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
American Politics with John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com
www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace
Newspaper: www.LibertyNewsOnLine.com
Email: john@TeaPartyRep.com

John Wallace Radio: Who is the real Barack Obama?

2010-06-03T20:52:00.001-07:00

AMERICAN POLITICS RADIO SHOW - SHOW REMINDER:

NEXT SHOW - (THIS FRIDAY) at 5:00PM EST

TOPIC: WHO IS THE REAL BARACK OBAMA?

As you know, Dr. Jerom Corsi PhD was unable to be on last weeks show but he has graciously agreed to be on this weeks show to talk about a recent investigation that disclosed that Barack Obama is apparently using a fraudulent social security number issued in Connecticut. We will also be discussing the fact that we really know nothing about Mr. Obama's history or who he really is because of an extraordinary lack of public documentation about the president. Along with his original birth certificate, Obama also has not released educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records, papers from his service in the Illinois state Senate, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and adoption papers. Is Mr. Obama the creation of the international Globalists? Why is the mainstream press not concerned about any of this? Tune in an find out. Dr Corsi will discuss these and other issues on this show. People are encouraged to call in.

If you have specific questions, on this or any other subject, please call the show while it is on the air (646-200-0326) and or email your questions or opinions to me and I will read them on the air.

Click on the link below for more information about the show and or to listen to the show.

www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace

If you, or a member of your organization, would like to be on the show, or you would like us to dedicate a show to a specific topic of interest, please email me at: John@TeaPartyRep.com

For Liberty,
John
______________________________
John Wallace
American Politics with John Wallace
Chatham, New York 12037
www.JohnWallaceRadio.com
www.blogtalkradio.com/john-wallace
Email: john@TeaPartyRep.com

VIDEO - LIBERTY IN AMERICA: IS TIME RUNNING OUT?

2010-05-15T12:58:00.000-07:00

To My Fellow Liberty Loving Americans,

"Liberty in America: Is Time Running Out?" is an introductory Video presentation on Liberty - each part is about 8 minutes.

Below are links to an introductory presentation given by me to a group of people who were new to the Liberty and Freedom movement. It is a basic primer for those who do not fully understand what has been going on in America for the past 50 to 100 years. Each segment is only about 8 or 9 minutes long and it moves rather quickly.

If you have friends who do not know where their rights come from, how we are gradually losing our individual Freedoms and Liberty and how the main points of the Communist Manifesto has been gradually introduced into America, send them the links to the course. It is not for people who already know what's going on. It is for the new recruits in the fight to restore our constitutional Republic.

Part I - We are gradually losing our Liberty

Part II - Your Unalienable Rights

Part III - the Constitution and the Bill of Rights

Part IV - Liberty - Sovereignty - Tyranny

Part V - Communist Manifesto in America

Part VI - the Globalist Agenda

Part VII - Constitutional Violations

Part VIII - Federal Reserve - Gold in Fort Knox

Part IX - National ID Card and Amnesty

Part X - Closing the Gate on Our Liberty

Part XI - What Can We Do?

I will also travel up to 200 miles from Columbia County NY to deliver this presentation in person. Email me at john@teapartyrep.com

For Liberty,

John Wallace
www.TeaPartyRep.com

A TEA PARTY RESPONSE TO A LIBERAL DEMOCRAT

2010-05-14T05:42:00.000-07:00

In a recent Letter to the Editor, a liberal Democrat asked where the Tea Partiers have been for the last eight years and then, right out of the National Democratic Party playbook, blamed both Bush administrations for everything but the weather. He asked us to come forward with solutions, but only if we agreed not to criticize the great progressive socialist agenda. He cautioned us not to use hateful speech directed at people of color, not to wrap ourselves in the flag, not to carry guns to political rallies and not to be paranoid about all things foreign or international. Wow, isn’t that big of him.

Although the Tea Party movement is only about two years old, many concerned Americans, including myself, have been involved in the non-partisan, non-violent Liberty movement for many, many years. The movement includes Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, Conservatives, Liberals, Independents and anyone else who wants a limited federal government. Although I might agree with this liberal Democrat with some of the issues he raised, the problems facing this great country have been caused by the actions of elected officials from both the Republican and Democrat parties over a long period of time. Their actions and in some cases their inactions, have given us the ever growing and more intrusive federal government that we have today.

For many, many decades and under both Republican and Democrat administrations, America has been in an almost constant state of undeclared war that has cost over 70,000 American lives, all without formal Declarations of War and in violation of the constitution. We have been incurring trillions of dollars worth of debt for programs and activities that are not authorized by the constitution. We have immigration laws on the books that have been ignored by several administrations. We have a President who refuses to prove he is a natural born citizen. We are using hackable computerized voting machines to count our votes in secret. We have instituted welfare policies that have encouraged irresponsibility, the breakdown of the family, and a generational cycle of dependency on government. Our government schools have become places of political and social indoctrination rather than education with an ever increasing number of students graduating from high school unable to read at a 4th grade level or to perform basic math functions.

I, like this liberal Democrat, believe that Barack Obama is the best thing that has happened to America in the last 100 years, but probably not for the same reasons.

Although the Liberty movement began to gain traction under the Geroge W. Bush term in office, I believe that history will see Barack Obama as the prime source of America's resurrection of individual Freedom and Liberty. In just one year, he has plunged the country into levels of debt that we could not have previously imagined, more debt than the previous 43 presidents combined. His corporate bailouts, stimulus spending, proposed cap and trade taxation, amnesty for illegal aliens, government mandated healthcare and other unconstitutional and misguided legislation have awakened the sleeping giant.

Average Americans, who have quietly gone about their lives in the past, are finally waking up to what is happening to their country. Literally millions of Americans have had enough. They are organizing, studying the Constitution and the Federalist Papers. They are once again reading American history, becoming activists, showing up at rallies and voicing their opinions at town hall meetings. There is a keen awareness among freedom loving Americans that our priorities must be radically changed before its too late. Just as the pendulum swung to embrace political correctness, liberalism and corporatism, we are now seeing the beginning stages of a backlash, a complete repudiation of almost a hundred years of nonsense and yes, the Tea Party movement is a part of this backlash, but only a small part.

I believe that Mr. Obama, in just over one year, has become the symbol of a creeping, progressive liberalism that has infected our society like a cancer for the last 50 to 100 years. The cancer has now metastasized to the point where it can no longer be ignored by the vast majority of the American people. A hundred years from now, history will perceive the year 2010 as the time when America finally got back on the right track and started to take control of their constitutional servant government. And for that, we can thank Barack Hussein Obama.

________________________
John Wallace
www.TeaPartyRep.com

Amnesty Supporters Threaten Unrest over Arizona's Illegal Alien Law

2010-04-28T06:34:00.001-07:00

Ever since Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer signed SB1070 into law to curb the flow of illegal aliens into her state, the Obama Administration and Amnesty advocates from around the country have ridiculed, criticized, and harassed Arizona lawmakers and its voters.

Professional racial protesters and Amnesty advocates from around the country have descended on the Arizona capital, causing violence and vandalism that has led to multiple arrests of illegal aliens and their supporters. Have you read about the violent protests and the attacks on the police from the government controlled, main stream media? Of course not! Even race-baiting, charleton and huckster, the Rev Al Sharpton of Tawana Brawley fraud fame, has promised to decend on the state.

The bill is a huge step in the right direction for Arizona and also for the American people. It may not be perfect, but Arizona has shown the way. The time has come to seize the momentum and get similar laws passed in other states with large numbers of illegal aliens.

For years, Arizona has waited for the federal government to do something about the 500,000+ illegal aliens who've overrun their state and taxed their welfare, social service, health and criminal justice systems.

Although Congress has talked a lot about improving border security, it has done very little to actually remove illegal aliens who slip past the border. This is outrageous, because it would take so little to encourage illegal aliens to return home. For example, Congress has refused to vote on Rep. Heath Shuler's SAVE Act, which would make job verification mandatory for all employers.

Arizona decided that it needed to protect its citizens because:

1. America has immigration laws on the books which make it a crime to live or work in this country illegally and they have not been enforced by the federal government.

2. All southern US Border States, inckuding Arizona, have seen a huge increase in murder, rape, armed robbery, gang style home invasions, and drug cartel activity over the past several years as illegal immigration from Mexico spins out of control, while the federal government has done nothing to protect its citizens.

The new Arizona law requires non-citizen immigrants to carry identity documents to prove they are legally in the country. Such laws are common in other countries. Failure to prove legal status is a misdemeanor. Police have been given broad powers to detain anyone suspected of being a illegal alien in Arizona and Governor Brewer has indicated that ‘profiling’ as such will not be tolerated.

The Governor has clearly stated that this new law represents another tool to solve a dangerous and unacceptable crisis which Arizona did not create and which the Federal government has refused to fix through decades of inaction and misguided policy. Rather than praise the state for taking this necessary action to protect its citizens, Mr. Obama, who himself may be in violation of eligibility laws for President and who wants amnesty for illegals, criticized the law as “misguided” and a threat “to undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans, as well as trust between police and our communities that is so crucial to keeping us safe”.

Questions to Mr. Obama: Is not the Federal government ‘misguided’ for not enforcing existing laws? Is fairness an issue just for criminals? And just who do you want to keep safe? Illegals who commit crimes against Americans?

Congressional neglect has been bad for Arizona: Prisons bursting with illegal aliens, illegal aliens receiving social welfare benefits, and emergency rooms crammed with uninsured illegal aliens. It's happening in a number of other states as well and it's a formula for the social meltdown of America.

Pushed to the edge, Arizona legislators have acted! The new legislation, which specifically prohibits racial profiling, was signed into law by Governor Jan Brewer. There are a half-dozen states where laws like Arizona's are being considered. Arizona was forced to act because of Congressional inaction and the dangerous unconstitutional missteps of the Obama administration.

For Example:

During his presidential campaign, Obama promised to stop ICE (immigration enforcement) raids on job sites. During the previous administration, work site raids had forced many illegal alien-hiring companies to "go straight."

Just days after he took his oath of office, Obama slapped down ICE after it raided a plant in Washington State that knowingly hired illegal workers. Since that time--there has not been a single raid.

Also, the President's next federal budget proposes CUTS in the number of Border Patrol agents. Not an increase. Not even holding the line. CUTS!!! Enforcement is crumbling!

If Congress refuses to crack down on illegal aliens who already here, and the Obama administration actually makes dodging federal law easier, states like Arizona will be forced to go it alone. Yes, the Arizona law is strict. But their situation is desperate. And the new law's provisions closely mirror existing federal law.

The Amnesty bill in congress is not dead either. Sen. Harry Reid continues his quest to destroy America by trying to pass an Amnesty bill this year at any cost, but it doesn't seem to be going very well at this time. Reid's obsession to pass an Amnesty bill is backfiring and even one of his closest Amnesty allies, Senator Lindsay Graham of SC, has withdraw his support for the Amnesty bill, at least for now.

All freedom loving Americans who believe in upholding and defending the US constitution that gives the states the right to protect its own citizens, must support our American brothers and sisters in Arizona as they stand up to protect their lives and liberty from federal government officials who are failing to live up to their constitutional oaths to enforce the immigration laws and protect the people of Arizona from an invasion of illegal aliens.

We must stand firm with the citizens oif Arizona ss they will surely face a coordinated attack from the government controlled, socialist main stream media as well as from an influx of marxist, socialist, and anti-white racist groups from around the country.

For Liberty,
John Wallace

NEVER MIND AUDITING THE FED: IT'S TIME FOR A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION

2010-04-03T19:46:00.000-07:00

The Federal Reserve has recently and very reluctently released details of its unlawful purchase of certain securities in order to help JP Morgan Chase takeover the Wall Street brokerage firm of Bear Stearns. Unfortunately for the Federal Reserve, this was a violation of federal law, as the Fed is not authorized to purchase anything other than securities that are backed by the full faith and credit of The United States.

Here is some basic information about three organizations that were created as part of the criminal scheme to defraud Americans that could also be considered part of a larger pattern of racketeering activity:

MAIDEN LANE LLC

Maiden Lane LLC is the first holding company bearing the name that was created when JPMorgan Chase took over Bear Stearns in early 2008. It holds an asset portfolio that JPMorgan found too risky to assume in whole, and consequently the Federal Reserve Bank of New York extended a $30 billion credit line to the limited liability company to facilitate the unwinding of these assets over time. Bloomberg, citing Bank of America analysts, reported on October 2, 2008, that the Federal Reserve might stand to lose $2 to $6 billion on the asset porfolio. A November 6, 2008, update by the Federal Reserve showed that the fair value of the assets was at $26.8 billion, meaning a book loss of $2 billion for the Federal Reserve.

The Maiden Lane name has been used for a series of bailouts including Maiden Lane II LLC and Maiden Lane III LLC. Maiden Lane was incorporated as Delaware Limited Liability Company on April 29, 2008, and registered to do business as a foreign limited liability company in the state of New York on June 26, 2008. The registered agent of Maiden Lane LLC is the CT Corporation

MAIDEN LANE II LLC

Maiden Lane II LLC is a limited liability company created when American International Group Inc. (AIG) was taken over by the U.S. government in September 2008. Since AIG's subsidiaries hold a great many residential mortgage-backed securities that are very risky, Maiden Lane II LLC was formed to purchase these RMBS. On December 12, 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York began extending credit to Maiden Lane II LLC. On the Fed's Balance Sheet as of May 6, 2009, net portfolio holdings of Maiden Lane II LLC are 180.16 billion dollars.

A news story dated March 16, 2009, stated Maiden Lane II used billions in bailout money to purchase toxic assets, and that AIG used billions to pay other banks, including foreign banks- France's Societe Generale at $11.9 billion, Germany's Deutsche Bank at $11.8 billion, and Britain's Barclays PLC at $8.5 billion. AIG, through this fund also funneled significant bailout money to U.S. banks that had already been bailed out themselves under the Troubled Asset Relief Program. As AIG counterparties, Goldman Sachs got $12.9 billion, Bank of America got $5.2 billion, and Citigroup got $2.3 billion all at 100% on the dollar.

The March 16, 2009 article was critical of AIG's plan to pay in excess of $170 million as bonuses to AIG employees. This was the second in a series of LLC companies formed to deal with the bank bailouts.

MAIDEN LANE III LLC

Maiden Lane III LLC is a holding company created when American International Group Inc. (AIG) was taken over by the U.S. government in September 2008. Similar to Maiden Lane II LLC, Maiden Lane III LLC aims to purchase multi-sector collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) on which the Financial Products group of AIG had written credit default swap contracts. On November 25, 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York began extending credit to Maiden Lane III LLC. As of May 6, 2009, The Federal Reserve's net portfolio holding of Maiden Lane III LLC is 26.4 billion dollars.

Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke, has repeatedly stated on numerous occasions that these financial deals would not cost anyone money. But the current value looks differently:

Assets in Maiden Lane II totaled $34.8 billion, according to the Fed, which set their current market value in its weekly balance sheet at $15.3 billion. That means Maiden Lane II assets are worth 44 cents on the dollar, or 44 percent of their face value, according to the Fed.

Maiden Lane III, which has $56 billion of assets at face value, is worth $22.1 billion, or 39 cents on the dollar, according to the Fed’s weekly balance sheet. A similar calculation for the Bear Stearns portfolio couldn’t be made because of outstanding derivatives trades.

In other words, through this criminal manipulation, these shell organizations have lost more than half of their value. This was and remains a blatantly unlawful activity.

The Federal Reserve is in violation of Article 1 Section 7 of The U.S. Constituion which reads in part: "All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills."

The Federal Reserve has unconstitutionally and illegally used taxpayer funds without authorization from Congress. At the time these shell "Maiden Lane" organizations were created, neither TARP or any other Congressional authorization existed for them to do so, and as of April 2010, no legislation has been put through Congress authorizing the expenditure of taxpayer funds, either through putting them at risk or via outright expense, for this purpose.

Sections 13 and 14, of the Federal Reserve Act, make it perfectly clear that the Federal Reserve is only authorized to purchase items backed by the "full faith and credit" of the United States government. Credit-default swaps and jumbo trash mortgages most certainly do not meet these qualifications.

There is simply no way to manipulate the facts to make the Federal Reserve's action constitutional or legal. The federal government, as the servant government of the people, must immediately audit the Federal Reserve's books and simutaneously initiate a criminal investigation into the actions of the Federal Reserve, as this group of private "banksters" has attempted to usurp the power of the United States House of Representatives.

The Federal Reserve has spent several years trying to avoid disclosing these illegal activities from the Congress and the people of America. It continues to resist both Congressional demands for disclosure and multiple Freedom of Information Act lawsuits.

It is time to hold the Federal Reserve to the rule of law. The fact that they resist any efforts at transparency is a sign that the Chairman and the entire Federal Reserve Board are involved in any number of illegal activities. We do not need meaningless fines and sanctions in return for the Federal Reserve Board to tell us that they "will never do that again." We need criminal prosecutions of those who willfully violated the criminal statutes and the U.S. constitution.

Amending The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (as Chris Dodd has proposed to prevent future lending bailouts) is not sufficient in that The Fed did not lend in this case, it purchased, and by buying what we now know were jumbo trash loans, it violated the letter of existing law.

There is only one effective remedy for an institution that has proven that it will not abide the law: it must be abolished and all of the criminal wrongdoers in the organization must be prosecuted to the highest extent possible.

We cannot have a Constitutional Republic where an unelected body of private banksters willfully, continuously and criminally violates the U.S. Constitution and other federal laws to the detriment of the American people.

The Federal Reserve is an ongoing criminal entreprise and the principals should be prosecuted under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).

According to the RICO statute, any person or group who operates or manages an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity may be in violation of the RICO Act.

Any group, including the members of the Federal Reserve Board, may be considered a RICO enterprise regardless of whether or not its members wear pinstripe suits.

John Wallace
www.4FLS.com

TAKE HEART AMERICA: HEALTH CARE IS ONLY ONE BATTLE IN THE WAR TO RESTORE LIBERTY IN AMERICA

2010-03-22T10:05:00.001-07:00

Take heart, freedom loving Americans. The Health Care bill is only one battle in the long war to restore our freedoms and liberty. The 'Gang of Three' (Obama, Pelosi and Reid) will keep pushing additional individual pieces of their American Communist Manifesto on us. They will be pushing Amnesty for Illegal Aliens, Cap and Trade, and gun legislation, before the elections in November of 2010.

We must continue the fight for Liberty and Freedom and resist each and every piece of legislation in every legal way that we can. When election day comes in November, we will oust many of the leaders and followers of the Democratic-Communist politburo in the House and Senate and our battle plan will turn from defensive actions to offensive actions.

We have learned from experience, that we cannot count on the federal courts to stop attacks on our Liberty as they often rule that ordinary American citizens have "no standing" in their courts. The federal courts are also part of the problem and just as corrupt as our legislative and executive branches of government.

Once we take control of the House of Representatives and possibly the US Senate in November of 2010, we will be able to cut off all funding for the nationalization of our Health Care system. Without the funding, there will be no nationalization of our Health Care system. We will also be able to cut off funding of other unconstitutional agencies and programs of our government

So take heart, fredom loving Americans and let us remember that at critical points in the history of this great country, only a few generations of Americans have been given the of honor and privilege of defending Liberty and Freedom in their maximum hour of mortal danger. In 1776, our Founders' generation was given that honor and privilege. The generations that lived through World War I and World War II were also given the honor and privilege of defending Liberty and Freedom in their darkest hours. In all these critical points in our history, brave Americans stood as one against Tyranny and our Liberty and Freedom were preserved.

Today in America, our Liberty and Freedom are once again in their maximum hour of mortal danger, just as they were in 1776, 1917 and 1941, and we are now the generation that must stand up against Tyranny as one united force and be prepared to act.

This is our time!!

We have not only been given the honor and privilege of defending Liberty and Freedom in their maximum hour of mortal danger, but our Founders told us that it is also our sacred duty to do so, not only for ourselves but for our children and our children's children. Do not lose heart over the loss of one battle or even several battles, for there is no doubt that freedom loving Americans will win the war to restore Liberty in America.

I pray to God that we will be successful.

GOD BLESS A FREE AMERICA!!!!!!

John Wallace
www.TeaPartyRep.com

AFTER NATIONALIZATION OF HEALTH CARE, AMNESTY FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS IS NEXT!

2010-03-20T19:35:00.000-07:00

If the "Gang of Three" (Obama, Pelosi and Reid) get their way and the unconstitutional Health Care bill is somehow rammed through the congress and signed by the imposter President, against the will of the majority of the American people, full Amnesty for the illegal aliens will be next.

If the communist style nationalization of the American Health Care system is completed, the Democratic-Communist Party will next try to steamroller the legislative approval of the remaining parts of their American Communist Manifesto before the elections in November of 2010.

Amnesty will be first, followed by Cap and Trade and then they will come after our guns.

President Obama has already approved a tentative plan drawn up by Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) that will allow illegal aliens to be put on a path to citizenship, offer green cards to keep high-skilled foreign university graduates in this country and create a temporary program for low-skilled workers, with some of these workers also getting the chance to become citizens. How does this help the American worker?

Thankfully, there is some resistance to this plan already. Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said flatly that it can't pass. "The bill doesn't have a prayer, because the American people oppose rewarding lawbreakers, which then encourages illegal immigration," he said. "Allowing millions of illegal immigrants to stay and take jobs away from citizens is like giving a burglar a key to the house. Illegal immigrants should return home and play by the rules like millions of legal immigrants."

Congress last looked at the illegal immigration problem back in 2007, when President George W. Bush joined with Democratic leaders to write a bill. But a bipartisan majority of senators joined a filibuster to block the bill.

The supporters of the 2007 effort concluded that Americans didn't trust the government to secure the borders and enforce the laws, even as they were offering legalization, particularly since illegal immigration has only grown since a 1986 amnesty.

The Schumer-Graham Plan has four main components:

1. an easier path to citizenship for illegal aliens
2. a program to let in even more foreign workers,
3. improvements in immigration enforcement (we've heard this before) and
4. the introduction of biometric Social Security cards to help employers weed out illegal workers, unfortunately and unconstitutionally, American workers will also be required to cary national worker ID cards to make this work under their plan. "Show me your papers?"

According ot the proposed plan, illegal immigrants would also have to demonstrate they are proficient at English and pass background checks to gain citizenship. More smoke and mirrors.

The plan would offer permanent legal status to foreign students who earn a post-graduate degree from an American university (so they can compete for jobs with our own college graduates), and will also create a future program for low-skilled workers (so they can compete with other American workers). Businesses could only hire them if no American worker is available, and the number allowed would fluctuate depending on the U.S. economy's needs. Workers who have kept jobs for a long time and have proved valuable members of their community could earn permanent legal status. How does this help the American worker?

This is just another piece of smoke and mirror amnesty legislation proposed by a couple of marxist-communists in the Senate and the White House that is designed to completely destroy our country.

Why would we want to continually import foreign workers into the USA when our own American born workers cannot find jobs? How does this help the American worker?

If this immigration amnesty proposal is successful, America, this great beacon of freedom in the world, will be turned into a communist, third world, multi-lingual, dumbed down, uneducated mass of humanity that can more easily be controlled and manipulated by their new Masters, the new American politburo and the old establishment oligarchy.

John Wallace
www.TeaPartyRep.com

CONGRESS MIGHT PASS THE HEALTH BILL WITHOUT VOTING ON IT: A STEP CLOSER TO TYRANNY

2010-03-16T19:11:00.000-07:00

There was a time when I wouldn't believe that members of congress would be so out of touch with the American people that they would have to resort to underhanded tactics to thwart the will of the people.

Well, Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, is thinking of doing just that. Representative Louise Slaughter (D-NY) came up with what is now known as the “Slaughter Solution” or "Deem and Pass" that will let the House of Representatives deem the Senate Health Bill as passed in the House without any representative voting on it. Once they use this outrageous procedure, the house leadership can then have additional language inserted into the bill that will satisfy those House Democrats who oppose the bill in its original form.

Meanwhile, in order for Senate Democrats to be able to use the Reconciliation procedure – a procedure that circumvents the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster – the House must pass the Senate Bill 'as is', with the exact same wording, before changes can be made. However, the Democratic leadership in the House doesn't have enough votes to do that and one of the biggest reasons is that the Senate Bill has a provision that allows for taxpayer funded abortions.

I believe that the Slaughter Solution is not only dishonest and smacks of dirty tricks, but I also believe that it is unconstitutional as is most of the legislation that congress has passed in recent years. Article I, Section VII, Clause II of the U.S. Constitution clearly states: "...the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively..." This newly invented "Slaughter Solution" clearly does not allow this type of procedure.

The Democratic leadership in the Senate has tried to assure the Democratic leadership in the House that if the House simply passes the bill as it is, the Senate will make changes amenable to the House after the fact. Pro-life House members, led by Bart Stupak (D-MI) are balking at this assurance and pointed to the hundreds of House bills that are currently still wallowing in the Senate. He also wants to see the changes in writing as he doesn't trust his own party's leaders.

If the Democratic leaderhip in the Senate imposes the 'Reconciliation Rule' to pass this bill, unfortunately for them, that alone will not be enough to get the bill passed. The reconciliation procedure, also known as the 'Byrd Rule' named after Senator Robert Byrd, is already extremely controversial. Senator Byrd is on the record in Congress saying his rule was “Never intended” to pass this kind of legislation, so the House leadership appears ready to adopt the Slaughter Solution instead. If the Slaughter Solution is instituted, the House of Representatives will actually pass the almost $875 billion bill without the members of the House actually voting on it. This is outrageous and smacks of something we would expect from the Russian politburo or a marxist distatorship.

Although the "Slaughter Solution" or the "deem and pass" rule has been used in the past, it has never been used to pass legislation as momentous as the $875 billion health-care bill. It is one of three options that Nancy Pelosi said she is considering for a House vote, but she added that she prefers this method because it would politically protect lawmakers who are reluctant to publicly support the measure. What an outrageous statement, particulalrly in view of constitutional requirements of Article I, Section VII, Clause II previously mentioned in this article.

There is also a 1998 Supreme Court ruling, CLINTON v. CITY OF NEW YORK (97-1374), that said each house of Congress must approve the exact same text of a bill before it can become law. A self-executing "deem and pass" rule would sidestep that requirement, former federal appellate judge Michael McConnell said in a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed and it would be unconstitutional.

The American people have overwhelmingly rejected this bill, but the President and the Democrat leaders in both houses of congress seem intent on using misinformation, lies, deceit, bribery and any other questionable and unconstitutional procedure to ram this socialist legislation down the throats of the American people without a public discussion of the merits. Why?

We are fast approaching a point of no return in America. If our Marxist President and the Democratic-Socialist leadership in congress are successful in passing this Health Bill, they will be emboldened to pass other critical legislation on their agenda to bring a free America to its knees. If the Health Bill is passed, they will quickly move to pass an all-encompassing Amnesty Bill, followed by a massive Cap and Trade Bill, a National biometric ID Card Bill and then the takeover of America will be almost complete. All that will be left is for them to come for our guns.

Let us remember that at critical points in human history, only a few generations have been given the honor and privlege of defending 'Freedom' in its maximum hour of danger.

In 1776, our founders' generation were given the honor and privlege of defending 'Freedom' in its maximum hour of danger, which resulted in the birth of this great nation that is still a beacon of hope to the freedom loving people of the world.

The generations of World War I and World War II were also given the honor and privlege of defending 'Freedom' in its maximun house of danger.

Today in America, we again find ourselves in a critical point in history, for 'Freedom' once again is in mortal danger, just as it was in 1776 and in WWI and WWII. Our generation is facing a different kind of mortal danger to our "Freedom' because that danger is not coming from some foreign country, king, dictator or enemy combatants, but it is coming from our own federal government.

Our Founders told us that “Governments get their just powers from the consent of the governed and whenever the government becomes destructive of these ends, it is not only the people's Right, but it is their sacred Duty to change the government. “

In 2010, we are now the generation that has been given the honor and privlege of defending 'Freedom' in its maximum hour of danger and this is our time to perform that sacred duty. We must stand up, speak up and be willing to actively resist the growing unconstitutional actions of the our federal government that puts the interests of government leaders and the oligarchy ahead of the interests of the people. By definition, this is tryanny.

Let us act before it's too late, not just for ourselves, but for our children and our children's children. I pray to God that we will be successful, for the free people of the world are depending on us.

GOD BLESS A FREE AMERICA!!!!!!

LIBERTY IN AMERICA: IS TIME RUNNING OUT? (A PRESENTATION)

2010-03-13T20:35:00.000-08:00

"LIBERTY IN AMERICA: IS TIME RUNNING OUT?

'FREE' PRESENTATION ABOUT THE GROWING THREATS TO YOUR LIBERTY

Date: March 25, 2010 - Thursday evening

Time: 7:00PM to 8:00PM (followed by Short Q&A period)

Location: White Stone Cafe,
2337 Route 66, Ghent, NY 12075 (518-392-7171)

Note: An optional full Buffet Dinner will be available before the presentation from 5:30PM to 7:00PM for only $10 per person.

Guest Speaker: John Wallace, of Chatham NY. He will be talking about the dangers to America's individual freedoms and liberty as a result of an ever growing and more intrusive federal government. He will show how that growing danger is directly linked to the unconstitutional actions of the federal government over many decades, under both Democrat and Republican administrations. He will show that time may indeed be running out on our Freedoms and Liberty, unless we are prepared to do something about it.

Note; This presentation is designed as an introduction for those American citizens interested in finding out out a little more about what is going on in America today. It is not for those who are already well versed in the issues, but you can always bring along a friend.

Several local Liberty Groups will also be present at the event, so come meet your neighbors, talk with them and get involved in the Liberty movement before its too late.

Sponsored by the Coalition of Concerned Citizens for the U.S. Constitution

For more information about the presentation, please go to the following link:
http://www.4fls.com/Presentation-TimeRunningOut-032510.htm

If you are coming please let us know by either filling out the short form on the above page or calling 518-392-7062 or 518-567-9647 to let us know how many are coming. It will help us to arrange the room so everyone can see.

For Freedom, Liberty and Sovereignty,
John Wallace
www.4FLS.com

Proposed Dietary Supplement Safety Act (S-3002)

2010-02-22T20:02:00.000-08:00

If you go to organic food or health food stores to purchase some nutritional supplements, your freedom of choice to purchase these products may be severely limited by a proposed piece of federal legislation recently submitted by Senator John McCain. The proposed legislation, entitled the "Dietary Supplement Safety Act (S-3002) not only targets nutritional supplements, but will also broaden the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) already expansive regulatory authority by allowing the FDA to impose draconian restrictions on developers, manufacturers, and sellers of nutritional products as well as on the products themselves.

The misleadingly titled "Dietary Supplement Safety Act" is nothing more than a federal regulatory scheme which would dictate which vitamins, minerals, or herbal products people will be permitted for use and in what potency. Big Pharma has been after the nutritional supplement industry for some time and it looks like the hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions is paying off again.

If this bill is passed in both houses, the legislation would install an onerous registration system for dietary supplement manufacturers; impose a burdensome documentation process for small organic and health food stores complete with monetary penalties for non-compliance and will grant sole discretionary powers to the Secretary of Health for immediate product recall. The federal government keeps growing larger and more intrusive with each piece of unconstitutional legislation.

The very broadly written bill leaves way too much discretion for federal government bureaucrats to interpret their own definitions for terms like “adulterated,” “misbranded,” and “reasonable probability.” It would even mandate the reporting of minor side effects, which is not even required for the worst FDA-approved drugs. A Pandora’s box of intended and unintended legal complications and government harassment of nutritional supplement manufacturers and small individual health food sellers could very well be unleashed if this bill is passed.

Those who best have consumers' health and safety interests at heart are the consumers themselves. This bill is an attempt by an ever growing and more intrusive government to take away yet another individual freedom, the right to choose one’s own natural treatment options, whether it be for warts, the common cold or cancer.

Americans have an unalienable right to make their own nutritional decisions. The people should continue to have unrestricted access to any nutritional supplements they desire and to keep the government out of their nutritional choices. If you oppose this bill, contact your US Senators and Representatives urging them not to cosponsor, support, or vote for S. 3002 or any similar bill.

John Wallace
Chatham, NY 12037
www.4FLS.com

LIBERTY IN AMERICA: IS TIME RUNNING OUT?

2010-02-03T19:29:00.000-08:00

Some people believe that time is running out for Liberty in America and I fear that it may be true. I believe that we, the free people of America, are at a critical time in our history. We are in danger of losing our individual Freedoms and Liberty to an ever growing and more intrusive federal government. The danger to our individual freedoms and liberty is directly linked to the unconstitutional actions of the federal government, under both Democrat and Republican administrations, that have been occuring over many decades.

For over two hundred years, millions of your fellow Americans, including those who have served in the Armed Forces, have raised their right hand and said, “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

Millions of other Americans routinely place their right hand over their heart and say, “I pledge Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all.”

How could any American citizen who has pledged to support and defend the Constitution, stand by as the following violations of the Constitution are slowly but surely destroying America?:

1. For many decades, our Government has been meddling in the internal affairs of other countries, without any Constitutional authority, causing foreign nationals to direct their hostilities towards us, which has given us a War on Terror and a growing Police State that is repugnant to the Fourth Amendment and the General Welfare of a Free People;

2. Since the end of World War II, we have had undeclared wars in violation of the War Powers clauses of Articles I and II;

3. We are now gifting and lending public money and credit to private corporations for decidedly private purposes (corporate welfare), without any constitutional authority, whatsoever;

4. We have a fiat currency, backed by absolutely nothing, in violation of the money clauses of Article I;

5. We have been emitting trillions of dollars worth of Bills of Credit through or under the auspices of the Federal Reserve System in violation of Article I;

6. We have been incurring trillions of dollars worth of debt for the payment of expenditures for programs and activities that are not enumerated in Article I, and therefore not authorized by the Constitution;

7. We have a fraudulently ratified 16th Amendment in violation of Article V, a direct, un-apportioned tax on labor in violation of the tax clauses of Article I, and a judicial system that refuses to consider the evidence, in violation of Article III;

8. For many decades we have had unenforced immigration laws in violation of that mandate, plainly-worded in Article II, that requires the President to “faithfully execute” all the laws passed by Congress;

9. We have a President who apparently is not a natural born citizen, a violation of Article II;

10. We are counting our votes in secret, as all machines do, in violation of our constitutional right not only to vote but to know that our votes are being accurately counted;

11. We have an absence of well-regulated state militias, and we have federal gun control laws, all in violation of the Second Amendment;

12. For many decades, in violation of the sovereignty clauses of the Declaration of Independence, the United States has been entering into treaties, contracts and relationships with foreign entities, and giving authority to international bodies, dissipating, destroying and undermining America’s sovereignty;

13. We have private land being taken for private purposes in violation of the Fifth Amendment;

14. We have a Government about to become a provider of Health Care, and about to order the People to purchase a product, powers that are not enumerated in Article I, and therefore not authorized by the Constitution;

15. We have money bills originating in the Senate, in violation of Article I;

16. We have a Senate that is using a supermajority vote to decide whether to enact a law, without an amendment to the Constitution, all in violation of Article I, Sections 3 and 5, and Article 5;

17. We have government officials who, for fourteen years, and more, have refused to honor their fundamental obligation to respond to the People’s First Amendment Petitions to Redress these violations.

It is well settled in American Jurisprudence that if anyone has an obligation to respond and he fails to do so, his silence amounts to an admission. It is also well settled that any Right that is not enforceable is not a Right – that is, with every Right there is a Remedy. However, the Constitution cannot defend itself. It is the duty of the People to defend it. Our country's Founders told us that Governments get their just powers from the consent of the governed and whenever the government becomes destructive of these ends, it is not only the people's Right, but it is their sacred Duty to change the government.

Because of these ongoing violations of our Constitution, American citizen delegates from 48 states came together on November 11, 2009 to attend Continental Congress 2009 at the Pheasant Run Conference Center in St. Charles, Illinois, organized by the "We the People" Foundation. I had the privilege to be elected as one of three New York delegates to Continental Congress 2009. The Delegates attending CC2009 were not professional legislators or wordsmiths. They were ordinary, non-aligned citizens from across America and all walks of life. They were willing to set aside their lives for this Assembly. They represented the Free People of America. Their recommended Course of Action to restore and maintain Constitutional obedience in America, is contained in a Document called the ARTICLES OF FREEDOM that I signed on November 22, 2009. You can download the document from this website.

You can also visit the ARTICLES OF FREEDOM WEBSITE at www.ArticlesOfFreedom.us, learn about the constitutional violations and hopefully, take the PLEDGE to stand with millions of your fellow Americans as the Articles of Freedom are served on our elected officials and then, if necessary, to be willing to participate in coordinated, non-violent, legal and Constitutional civic actions to stop the violations.

Thomas Jefferson said: "When the people fear their government, there is Tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is Liberty!"

Together, let us begin a journey that will leave future generations of Americans a legacy of individual freedom and liberty, a first class, non-government run education system, a clean environment, a strong and sovereign America with an honest, limited, constitutional government that will offer unlimited opportunities for their future. If we stand together and act now, we can give it to them.

For Freedom, Liberty and Sovereignty,

John Wallace
www.TeaPartyRep.com

10TH AMENDMENT PLEDGE

2010-01-24T16:07:00.000-08:00

The Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution states:

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

The purpose of the Tenth Amendment, much like the Ninth Amendment, is to clearly eliminate any ambiguities about the true purpose of the US Constitution, which is to protect our rights and property by severely limiting the privileges and powers delegated to the federal government.

The Tenth Amendment reinforces the idea that the three branches of the federal government and their agents can only exercise powers specifically granted to them in the Constitution. Unfortunately, the federal government has far exceeded the privileges and powers authorized by the Constitution.

The oligarchy in Washington seems to believe that the Constitution is a “living document” and that the power should flow downward from the federal government, to the states and finally to the people. This is the complete opposite of the way things are supposed to be and the states and the people, including their elected representatives, must step in to correct this unconstitutional situation before it is too late.

For the reasons indicated, I hereby take the following pledge:

THE FEDERAL PLEDGE

As a public office holder, or a candidate for public office, I affirm that:

1. All just political authority is derived from the People, and government may only be established and maintained with their consent.

2. The People of each State have the sole and exclusive right and power to govern themselves in all areas not delegated to their government.

3. A government without limits is a tyranny.

4. The Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that which has been delegated by the people to the federal government in the Constitution, and also that which is necessary and proper to advancing those powers specifically enumerated in the Constitution of the United States. The rest is to be handled by the state governments, or by the people themselves, as they determine.

5. In order for a federally-exercised power to be “necessary and proper” it must be a) something that, without which, would make the enumerated power impossible to exercise, and b) a lesser power than that which has been enumerated.

6. The “Interstate Commerce Clause” in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, does not permit Congress to regulate matters that merely affect commerce among the States. It only permits Congress to regulate trade among the States.

7. The phrase, “general Welfare,” in Article I, Section 8 does not authorize Congress to enact any laws it claims are in the “general Welfare” of the United States. The phrase sets forth the requirement that all laws passed by Congress in Pursuance of the enumerated powers of the Constitution shall also be in the general Welfare of the United States. This was affirmed by James Madison when he wrote: “With respect to the words “general welfare,” I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators.”

8. The federal government is not authorized to tax the People to raise monies for unconstitutional purposes. Likewise, the federal government is not authorized to condition funding to State or local governments on compliance with mandates which require them to do what the federal government is not authorized to do directly.

9. When Congress enacts laws and regulations that are not made in Pursuance of the powers enumerated in the Constitution, the People are not bound to obey them.

10. When the federal government exceeds its Constitutional authority, a nullification of the act is the rightful remedy. Without that remedy, the People would be living in a tyranny, under the unlawful and excessive control of one or more branches of the federal government.

As a public office holder, or a candidate for public office, I promise that, as long as I hold office:

1. My votes will always be in favor of the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of this State. Every issue. Every time. No exceptions. No excuses.

2. I do, and will continue to, oppose any and all efforts by the federal government to act beyond its Constitutional authority.

3. I will proactively introduce and support measures designed to adhere to the Tenth Amendment and preserve, to their fullest extent, the powers of the People in my district, and of the legislators and administrations of my State.

4. I will introduce, sponsor and support a resolution affirming the sovereignty of the People of each State under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

5. I will introduce, sponsor, and support legislation that seeks to repeal laws and regulations that are outside the scope of the powers delegated by the people to the federal government.

6. I will introduce, sponsor and support legislation that provides such relief as is necessary and proper to provide fair redress to the citizens of my State in response to actions by the federal government which exceeds its Constitutional authority.

7. Whenever I vote in favor of a new federal power, I will always make public my justification for it within the confines of the enumerated powers of the Constitution.

8. I will only vote in favor of a bill that I have thoroughly read, considered and understood.

9. I will be accountable to voters. Upon request, I will make public every vote I cast while in office.

10. I will keep this pledge public, and will provide a link on my website which directs constituents to the text of this pledge.

Signed by:

John W. Wallace
Candidate for Congress
New York's 20th CD
www.TeaPartyRep.com

CONGRESSIONAL REFORM ACT OF 2010

2010-01-05T06:48:00.000-08:00

Even though many Republicans, Democrats, Conservatives, Liberals and independent voting Americans may disagree on many of the issues of the day, I believe that we can all agree that the United States Congress (both houses) has become a corrupt disfunctional organization that is no longer listening to the will of the American people. Being that congress is part of our "servant government" that is supposed to work for the people, we the people believe that the country now needs a "Congressional Reform Act of 2010" to reign in our out-of-control congress.

The proposed "Congressional Reform Acrt of 2010 would contain ten provisions, all of which would probably be strongly endorsed by our country's Founders who believed in a limited federal government that they created in the United States Constitution, including the Bill of Rights. The purpose of this legislation would be to return America to a constitutional republic.

Congress currently has the lowest approval of any entity in Government and now is the time when Americans should join together to reform Congress - one of the entities created by the Founders that is supposed to represents us. Let us remember that serving in Congress is an honor and should not be a permanent career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, who would serve their country for limited amount of time and then return to their home states and go back to work in their own profession. It is time to get rid of the career politicians.

Here are the ten provisions of the proposed CONGRESSIONAL REFORM ACT OF 2010

1. Term Limits: 12 years only, one of the possible options below.

A. Two Six year Senate terms
B. Six Two year House terms
C. One Six year Senate term and three Two Year House terms

2. No Tenure / No Pension: A congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office.

3. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security: All funds in the Congressional retirement fund moves to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, Congress participates with the American people.

4. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan just as all Americans do.

5. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.

6. Congress looses their current health care plan and must participate in the same health care system that they mandate for the American people.

7. Congress must equally abide in all laws they impose on the American people. There must be no exemptions from any laws by members of congress.

8. Any federal government contracts currently held by former and present Senators and Members of the House of Representatives are void effective 1/1/2011.

9. All contributions (bribes) from lobbyist and special interest groups should be declared to be bribery and therefore made illegal. Only campaign contributions from individual American citizens should be allowed.

10. All bills and legislation must be single purposed. An individual bill should address one specific issue and only that issue. Any amendments must directly address that specific issue. No pork, no side issues, and especially, no riders. All bills must be published and the discussions open to public scrutiny. All votes to be by roll call so the constituents will know who supported or opposed what bills.

The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, who would serve their country for limited amount of time and then return to their home states and go back to work in their own profession. It is time to get rid of the career politicians.

A NOTE TO MY FELLOW AMERICANS: If you have any suggestions to add to this bill, just submit a comment on it.

John Wallace
www.TeaPartyRep.com

Articles of Freedom: Do Not Go Gently Into That Good Night

2009-12-26T10:33:00.001-08:00

From the moment I stood in the lobby of the Pheasant Run Hotel and Conference Center in St. Charles Illinois on the morning of November 11, 2009, I knew that this would be an important gathering of American citizens. By the end of the day, more than one hundred and twenty delegates from 48 states had arrived and we began the deliberations of Continental Congress 2009 that would last 11 days. All of the delegates had high hopes that something good would come from this effort; something that would help the America people find their way at this crucial time in our history.

No one could have predicted the things that took place over those eleven days and no one who attended would ever be the same. American citizens from 48 of these united States, from all walks of life, had come together in a people's congress to devise a plan to return America to Constitutional government. Working long into the night, every night, we huddled together in small and large groups, talking about the Constitution, discussing the Constitution, trying to find the way back to constitutional government for this great country.

From this historic gathering, a document entitled the 'Articles of Freedom,' was prepared for the Free People of America, written by the delegates themselves who made up a cross section of the American people. This document doesn't pretend to have all the answers, nor do we expect all Americans to agree to each and every part. We do hope, however, that the Articles of Freedom, will serve as a wake-up call for our elected officials and the free people of America. The document represents a strategic plan that can be used by the people to turn America around and restore our Republic.

The Articles of Freedom are for those Americans who may not be aware of how far we have strayed from our constitutional government and who now need to decide where they stand.

The Articles of Freedom are also for those who are already aware of how far we have strayed, but we hope that this document can be used as the the basis for the rallying call that will bring all freedom loving groups and individual Americans together.

Click on the link below to review and/or download the Articles of Freedom:

http://www.cc2009.us/images/pdf/Articles-of-Freedom.12.24.2009.pdf

The free people of America are just beginning what may be the most challenging, unrelenting fight of our lives – on all levels --- to protect the America that God gave us. The free people of America are being attacked from a hundred different directions at once by an out-of-control federal government that is growing larger and more intrusive every day. New laws and regulations are being passed by our federal government almost daily, which are slowly and silently taking away more and more of our liberties. If we do nothing, we will someday wake up in a Nation we no longer recognize.

We are reminded that the United States Constitution cannot defend itself. It is up to us, We the People, to defend it, and defend it we must before it is too late. This is not a time to for the American people to sit on the sidelines and watch events unfold before them on TV, the radio, the internet and in the newspapers. There has never been a more important time for Americans to be aware of what is going on in America. We ask that you review this document, educate yourself, become politically active and pray to God for the preservation of this free country.

As the light of freedom and liberty is becoming diminished in this country, I am reminded of the words of Dylan Thomas in his poem entitled 'Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night' which can be applied to conditions in today's America:

"Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light."

I believe that the light of freedom and liberty in our country is beginning to flicker and is gradually being diminished by our own government. As free Americans, we must "rage against the dying of the light" of freedom and liberty in our country with all the strength we can muster. We must be prepared to fight to defend our constitution and we must never be willing to "go gently into that Good Night" of the darkness of socialism and marxism that is destroying our country.

As the Articles of Freedom are reviewed by you, the American people and state and federal elected officials, we expect that there will be recommendations made to the delegates of the Continental Congress to consider individual changes and/or to add new recommendations. Should this be the case, or should political circumstances in the country demand it, the Continental Congress will be reconvened to address these matters.

Click on the link below to download the Articles of Freedom:

http://www.cc2009.us/images/pdf/Articles-of-Freedom.12.24.2009.pdf

If you would like me, or another delegate from the Continental Congress, to speak before a group of citizens about Continental Congress 2009 and the Articles of Freedom, just email me.

For Freedom, LIberty and Sovereignty,

John Wallace
Chatham, New York
CC2009 - New York Delegate
www.4FLS.com

POLITICALLY CORRECT HOLIDAY GREETINGS

2009-12-19T07:37:00.000-08:00

May I offer my freedom and liberty loving friends and associates a Merry Christmas and a Happy Hanukkah and best wishes for a happy and blessed New Year.

To all those progressives, communists and politically correct liberals out there, please accept with no obligation, implied or implicit, my best wishes for an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low stress, non addictive, gender neutral celebration of the winter solstice holiday practiced within the most enjoyable traditions of the religious persuasion of your choice, or secular practices of your choice, with respect for the religious/secular persuasion and/or traditions of others, or their choice not to practice religious or secular traditions at all.

I also wish you a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling and medically uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the generally accepted calendar year 2010, but not without due respect for the calendars of choice of other cultures whose contributions to society have helped make America great. Not to imply that America is necessarily greater than any other country nor the only America in the Western Hemisphere. Also this wish is made without regard to the race, creed, color, age, physical ability, religious faith, or sexual preference of the wished.

John Wallace
www.4FLS.com

Articles of Freedom of Continental Congress 2009

2009-11-23T06:06:00.000-08:00

The following is the Preamble to the ARTICLES OF FREEDOM that contains words that are as powerful as those in the Declaration of Independence:

Articles of Freedom of Continental Congress 2009
November 21, 2009

"In defense of a free people, the time has come to reassert our God-given natural rights and cast off tyranny.

Let the facts reveal - the Federal Government of the United States of America, which was instituted to protect the rights of individual citizens, instead - threatens our life, liberty and property through usurpations of the Constitution; and emboldened by our own lack of responsibility and due diligence in these matters, has exceeded its mandate, and abandoned those founding principles which have made our nation exceptional;

Our servant government has undertaken these unconstitutional actions in direct violation of their enumerated duties, to the detriment of the People's liberty and the sovereignty of our Republic;

Over many years and spanning multiple political administrations, the People who have, in good conscience, attempted to deliberate our grievances and voice our dissent against these offensive actions through both petition and assembly, have been maligned and ignored with contempt;

The people of the several States of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming, justly alarmed at these arbitrary and unconstitutional actions, have elected, constituted and appointed delegates to meet, and sit in general Congress in the city of St. Charles, Illinois.

Whereupon these delegates, as duly elected representatives of the several States, have gathered in defense of divine justice, liberty and the principles of limited government, and we stand in clear recognition of the supreme law of the land - the Constitution of the United States of America.

Therefore, We demand that Government immediately re-establish Constitutional rule of law, lest the People be forced to do so themselves; and we hereby serve notice that in the defense of Freedom and Liberty there shall be NO COMPROMISE to which we shall every yield."

-------------------

On Saturday, November 21, 2009 the Continental Congress 2009 Delegates finalized a 70+ page document entitled "Articles of Freedom" agreeing on the draft in substance, subject to revisions for style, spelling and consistency. The report will contain the Preamble, Civic Action Statement and Pledge. There will be Committee Reports on each area of Constitutional Violations, along with a listing of the Instructions and Civic Actions for each area. The final report will be posted in their entirety as soon as possible at www.ArticlesofFreedom.us

HISTORIC CONTINENTAL CONGRESS 2009 CONVENES IN THE USA

2009-11-13T16:10:00.000-08:00

Wednesday, November 11, 2009 may one day be known as the day the American People convened, for the first time in over two centuries, an Assembly of representatives of the People in order to fully exercise of the "Capstone Right" -- i.e., the Petition clause of the First Amendment.

At approximately 3:00 pm Wednesday, WE THE PEOPLE Chairman Bob Schulz convened the Assembly to begin the selection of Congress officers from the ranks of elected Delegates who will preside over the 11-day long Assembly. Constitutional scholar and former Presidential candidate Michael Badnarik was selected as the presiding officer of the Congress while he was still a Delegate from Texas.

Following the ceremonial Liberty Banquet dinner at the St. Charles, Illinois Pheasant Run venue, the Delegates gathered in the main deliberation hall for the Opening Ceremony which was broadcast live. The song-centered ceremony featured presentation of the fifty state flags by the Delegates, as well as several patriotic group songs and inspirational prayers.

For over a decade, WTP Foundation has championed an intensive, well-researched and coherent effort to hold the Government accountable for its escalating violations of fundamental Rights and the Constitution through use of the Right of the People to "petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Those ongoing abuses include violations of the Constitution's tax, money, war, general welfare, privacy and other clauses that are at the heart of the conditions that now plague our nation. (See our Petitions for Redress)

Although the public has known little about the history or nature of the Right to Petition, scholarly and historical research has established without argument, that the Right, first articulated as the cornerstone of Western Law in Magna Carta (1215), provides the People an individual Right to hold Government peacefully accountable for its abuses.

Far beyond the right to merely send "complaints" to the government (which are virtually ignored by all officials), the Right of Petition embodies the profound Right to enforce the Right to Petition by withdrawing support from the Government until Redress is secured.

Summaries of this important research can be reviewed as part of the legal pleadings of the 2004 landmark WTP lawsuit, We The People vs. United States, which sought to have the Judiciary declare - for the first time in history - the legal and constitutional meaning of the last ten words of the First Amendment. In 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear this controversial case involving the essence of Popular Sovereignty.

Continental Congress 2009 will take the process of holding the United States Government accountable and restoring the Constitution to the next level by first creating a formal record of the vast violations of the Constitution and Individual Rights now suffered by the People. Next, the Congr ess will debate and decide upon a series of practical but strong "Civic Actions" the People may take in order to restore their Liberty.

The agenda for the CC2009 Assembly also provides for the development and adoption of formal "Remedial Instructions" to be served upon federal and state officials, in essence ordering them to cease and desist their official abuses and giving them formal Notice as to the "Civic Actions" of (peaceful) resistance the People may take, en masse, if those officials, yet again, choose to ignore the People's Petitions for Redress.

Here is a partial list of constitutional questions to be addressed by the CC2009:

1. Unalienable Rights of all US Citizens
2. Federal Reserve
3. Constitution and Bill of Rights
4. Tax Laws
5. Natural Born Citizen Clause
6. War Powers Acts
7. USA Patriot Act
8. Welfare Clause
9. Faithfully Execute Clause
10. National Sovereignty
11. Property Rights
12. Right to Bear Arms

Most of the CC2009 event can be viewed live each day at these links: www.GiveMeLiberty.org/CC2009 or at www.CC2009.us.

Update submitted by:
John Wallace
www.4FLS.com

A WARNING TO STOP AMERICA'S MARCH TOWARDS THE NEW WORLD ORDER

2009-11-09T11:24:00.000-08:00

The following is a comment on America's march towards the New World Order from a European perspective. The people of western Europe are warning us not to follow in their footsteps. It is a european perspective of their own plight and they are simply giving us a warning about ours.

It means that salvation of freedom and liberty for the free world may rest on our shoulders since we are just about the last ones left (except Australia and NZ) who have not lived under a dictatorship. Europe has fallen again WITHOUT A SINGLE SHOT BEING FIRED and it was all done with money. The following commentary is long, but well worth reading.

---------------------------------------
The Warning from our friends in Europe:

National sovereignty in Europe - what little is left of it - was condemned to history this week with the signing of the 'Lisbon Treaty' that centralises power in the European Union like never before. The Rubicon has now been crossed and we enter full-blown tyranny. (just adding that there is a death penalty in that treaty for rebellion, protest marches and dissent; good bye freedom).

The final signature to the agreement was that of Vaclav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic, who had held out as long as he thought was possible. Klaus has been a vehement critic of the Treaty and he well knows what it means for European freedom and national sovereignty and identity.

He is clearly a man who can see beyond the end of his nose and the garbage that must be daily put before him by officialdom, but when he swished his pen this week he was well aware that he was effectively signing away all rights for Europeans to decide their own national destiny and handing them to the dark-suits and dark minds in the EU bureaucracy in Brussels, Belgium.

The same is planned for North America, Africa and Asia-Australia-New Zealand and it is good to be streetwise about the methods and techniques employed to seize control of the sovereign nation state. What has been done to ensnare Europe is happening now around the world.

The basic theme is encapsulated in a single quote 57 years ago by the 'Father of Europe', the Rothschild frontman, Jean Monnet. In the year I was born, he wrote this in a letter to a friend:

'Europe's nations should be guided towards the super-state without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.'

And so it was.

This technique is called the Totalitarian Tiptoe. You move towards your goal in a series of many small steps and not in a few big leaps that would alert the population to what is going on. The Illuminati Fabian Society, from where George Orwell and Aldous Huxley secured the information for their 'prophetic' books, 1984 and Brave New World, is even named after Fabius Maximus, a Roman general and dictator who mastered this technique of wearing down an opponent over time. It is captured visually by the Fabian Society logo - a wolf in sheep's clothing

Today's centrally-controlled European dictatorship began life as the "European Coal and Steel Community" European Coal and Steel Community, established in 1951. This integrated the coal and steel industries of France, West Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg and came from an 'idea' by Jean Monnet (tiptoe).

The six countries of the "European Coal and Steel Community" European Coal and Steel Community signed the Treaty of Rome in 1957 to create the 'EEC', the European Economic Community (tiptoe).

The EEC was enlarged in 1973 to include Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom. The UK's entry was promoted by Rothschild asset, Satanist and child-killer, Ted Heath, and the deal signed when he was Prime Minister (tiptoe).

The first direct and, allegedly, 'democratic' elections to the irrelevant European Parliament were held in 1973 in an attempt to hide the fact that the whole fascist/communist structure was controlled by unelected bureaucrats. Greece joined the EEC in 1981 followed by Spain and Portugal in 1986 (tiptoe).

The Schengen Agreement of 1985 opened the borders between most member states and a year later the 'Community' introduced its own flag (tiptoe).

The Schengen Agreement of 1985 opened the borders between most member states and a year later the 'Community' introduced its own flag (tiptoe).

The European Union was formally established when the Maastricht Treaty became law in 1993. It massively advanced the power of the bureaucrats and opened the way for the introduction of the single European currency, the euro (tiptoe).

The European Union expanded to include 27 member states with around 500 million people who have their lives dictated down to increasingly fine detail by faceless dark-suits and the hapless, ruthless and corrupt politicians they control (tiptoe).

Then came the final push to end the reign of the nation state in Europe as, in any way, a self-governing entity. This was the proposed European Constitution, produced by long-time Illuminati asset, the former French President, Valéry Giscard d'Estaing. It was he who had told the then Soviet President, Mikhail Gorbachev, in January 1989:

'Mr President, I cannot tell you exactly when it will happen - probably within 15 years - but Europe is going to be a federal state and you have to prepare yourself for that. You have to work out with us, and the European leaders, how you would react to that, how would you allow the other East European countries to interact with it or how to become a part of it, you have to be prepared.'

Giscard d'Estaing was meeting Gorbachev with David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger in a delegation from the Rothschild-controlled Trilateral Commission, an organisation officially co-founded by Rockefeller and Barack Obama mentor, Zbigniew Brzezinski.

The estimate of 'within 15 years' would have been pretty much spot on had they not made the mistake of actually giving the public a say in the Netherlands and France in 2005.

Both populations rejected the Constitution in referendums because they could see what the implications were of the creation of a President of Europe, a European Foreign Minister and the vast erosion of national powers to veto and opt out of bureaucrat-dictated laws and regulations.

What normally happens when referendums about the EU go the 'wrong way' is that they wait a while, pour resources, people and propaganda into the country, and then force another vote. This has happened a number of times.

They could see with French and Dutch, however, that the feeling against the Constitution was so strong that this was not going to work. So, they simply changed the name of the document from the European Constitution to the Lisbon Treaty.

Some 98% of the content was the same, but they said that because it was now 'just' a treaty and not a constitution, it was not affected by the French and Dutch votes and the promise of the Blair government in Britain to 'guarantee' a public vote on the Constitution no longer applied.

I will now go through the sequence of events that happened in Britain between then and this week. It is such a classic example of the way the system is manipulated and the people scammed by politicians who claim to be on different 'sides', but aren't.

It is information that those in other countries would benefit from knowing, given that these techniques are universal and not confined to Britain.

Tony Blair, the then Prime Minister, and his Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown, made their commitment to a public referendum on the European Constitution to help them win the General Election in May 2005, but then Brown, who replaced Blair as Prime Minister in 2007, said there would be no such public vote.

Brown said outrageously (and following the agreed line throughout Europe) that the Treaty was significantly different from the Constitution and so his commitment to a referendum was not relevant. What he meant, as with other European leaders, like Mossad operative Sarkozy in France, is that they knew the populations would reject it whatever name you dressed it up with and so they were not going to be given the chance.

For those outside the UK, Gordon Brown leads (in theory) the Labour Party while the main 'opposition' is the Conservative Party, headed by David Cameron. Playing the mind games that they do, just like the Republicans and Democrats in the US, Cameron pledged a 'cast iron guarantee' that he would give the British people a referendum on the Treaty if he was voted into office.

He did this with the confidence of someone who believed that the Treaty would be all done and dusted, in place and in operation, by the time he ever made it to Downing Street, but he had to placate public opinion and the many in his own party who oppose the further erosion of British sovereignty.

A spanner was thrown in this cosy little 'works', albeit sadly temporarily, by the only nation given a referendum on the Treaty - Ireland. Even the EU bully boys couldn't stop this because it was in the Irish Constitution that there had to be a public vote on such a transfer of power.

It was thought that a 'yes' vote would be breeze, but the Irish voted 'no' in June 2008 and the Brussels toilet roll order did soar. Oh my God!

Every country had to agree to the Treaty for it to become law and the truly useless Irish government of Brian Cowen could not do so in the light of the public decision.

While Cowen was given his orders to have another vote and get the right answer, more potential trouble was brewing in the UK. By the middle of 2008, just after the Irish referendum, Gordon Brown was in desperate trouble and potentially could have been forced out.

His 'leadership' proved so inept that the plotters were gathering in his own party to get rid of him and this was highly likely to lead to a general election in which David Cameron would have been hot favourite to win.

But hold on. The Irish vote had delayed the signing of the Lisbon Treaty by at least a year and Cameron had given his 'cast iron guarantee' to give the British people a referendum, one in which they would have voted 'no' by a considerably margin.

Oh my God (2).

The only way to save the Treaty was to keep Brown in office until the Irish vote was overturned and the document passed into law. Enter Britain's Mr Sleaze and Slither, Peter Mandelson, the Rothschild bosom buddy, and the UK's version of Rahm Emanuel, Obama's handler and spinner and another operative for the Rothschilds.

Mandelson can't stand Brown, but needs must from his point of view. If Brown's survival was required to save the Treaty, so be it.

Mandelson was twice forced to resign from the Blair government amid allegations of corruption and went off to Brussels to become one of the dark-suit 'commissioners'. He made an enormous fortune from taxpayers' money and advanced the agenda for a pan-European dictatorship.

It was announced in October 2008, with Brown's leadership in disarray, that Mandelson had been appointed to the government as 'Business Secretary', just in time to take control of financial policy in the wake of the banking crisis orchestrated by his Rothschild masters and associates.

There was the little matter that Mandelson was not an elected Member of Parliament, but that was no problem. He was simply made a 'Lord' which qualified him to attend the House of Lords and, in turn, allowed him to be appointed to government.

No public vote necessary. Ain't 'democracy' great?

Mandelson set about quelling the internal rebellion against Brown to keep him in office, ensuring that shocking amounts of money were squandered in bailing out the banks and accumulated extraordinary powers that gave him a place on 35 of the 43 Cabinet committees and subcommittees.

Mandelson runs the British government to this day - in other words, the Rothschilds do.

Last month the Irish voted 'yes' in the re-run referendum on the Lisbon Treaty - an absolutely mind-boggling decision and testament to how easy it is for the few to control the many when the many are not conscious.

What can you say about people who are so blatantly abused and insulted by having their first decision rejected by the EU tyranny and then vote again and agree to give control of their lives and their country to the very same EU tyranny.

To those in Ireland who voted yes, and even more so to those who celebrated the 'victory' in the streets, I should remind you that you need to breathe every few seconds or you die. Don't forget, now.

And a few people can't control the world??

The Irish 'yessers' were actually voting to dismantle their own country, hand complete control over anything that matters to Brussels bureaucrats and, irony of ironies, ensuring that they will never get the chance to vote again on increased EU powers because that right is deleted by the Lisbon Treaty.

One man held out against the tide and that was Vaclav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic, who's idea appeared to be to delay signing on behalf of his country until Cameron came to office in the UK and triggered a referendum.

It was never a plan because Cameron had no intention of scuppering the establishment. My goodness, he is the establishment. He has family ties to the Rothschilds, the world banking cartel and royalty.

Cameron's great-great grandfather, Sir Ewen Cameron, helped the Rothschilds sell war bonds during the Russo-Japanese war and his great-grandfather, Emile Levita, a Jewish immigrant to Britain from Germany in 1850, was director of the London-based Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China.

A family connection to King George III makes Cameron a fifth cousin of the Queen, twice removed. Cameron is also related to William IV. His immensely wealthy father-in-law is a direct descendant of Charles II and can trace his bloodline back to the Knights Templar and the Fifth Crusade.

Yep, what a rebel Cameron must be.

The circle was completed on Wednesday when Cameron announced that, with Vaclav Klaus signing the Lisbon Treaty and its introduction planned within weeks, he was withdrawing his pledge to have a referendum on it, or European integration, if he wins the next election.

Game, set and match.

He announced that instead there would be a referendum on any future treaties and he would negotiate a return of (unspecified) powers to Britain. Is that a 'cast iron guarantee', Dave?

But all this is nonsense and Cameron knows it. There will be no more treaties for the people to vote on - the Lisbon document is 'self-amending' and they can just add to it as they like. The return of powers already conceded to the EU is specifically forbidden by documents already signed.

The European Economic Community was lied into existence and it has been lied into its present state as the 'legal personality' of a 'country' called Europe. The 'nation states' are merely its regions. The ratification of the Lisbon Treaty means:

The EU can negotiate and sign international treaties on behalf of the whole of Europe and establish a publicly-unelected President of Europe and Foreign Minister.

EU judges have powers over 'justice' and policing for the first time, and the EU police force, Europol, will be able to instigate investigations in member states (regions).

So-called 'ratchet clauses' allow the EU to increase the powers of the Brussels bureaucrats without any new treaties and thus anything now goes, basically.
Even without these further powers to be added in the future, the Lisbon Treaty deletes the ability of 'nation states' like Britain to veto EU legislation in 16 new areas, including transport.

The EU can introduce a 'common defence policy' for Europe leading to the creation of a European army.

It will be easier for the EU to force countries to accept 'asylum seekers' (whether genuine or not) and have a say, eventually the whole say, in what benefits are paid to them.

This was the week the nation state effectively ended in Europe and a tidal wave of new laws and regulations, long since written and waiting, are about to deluge the countries of Europe when the Lisbon Treaty comes into force in a few weeks.

It has all been planned since at least the 19th century, probably long before that, and lying, cheating and deeply corrupt politicians and bureaucrats have ensured over the last 60 years that the nightmare became fact.

In Europe at least, the game just changed to a whole new phase. Learn the lesson North America, Africa, Asia, Australia and New Zealand. You are next in line. Don't let them do the same to you.
---------------

It's time for freedom loving Americans to stand up and resist the tyranny of our own government before it is too late. let's start by getting back to a constitutional republic. We need another Continental Congress to give our government a warning and instructions from the people. We can start with abolishing the Federal Reserve and removing its strangle hold on our country.

For Freedom, Liberty and Sovereignty,
John Wallace
www.4FLS.com

I AM AN AMERICAN: NOT A HYPHENIATED AMERICAN

2009-09-28T07:41:00.000-07:00

It seems that America has become a country obsessed with classifying its citizens into different racial and ethnic sub-groups. President Obama is routinely called the first Black president, but isn’t he also half white? To be more accurate, isn’t he really the first mixed race president? The media and special interest groups constantly refer to him as the Black president. Americans are constantly being bombarded by government and media reports of the first Hispanic person to do this, the first Asian person to do that, or the first Black person to do something else.
My message to the government bureaucrats, the special interest groups and the mass media is that the vast majority of Americans don’t care what a person’s race or ethnic origin is. Throughout our history, Americans of all races and ethnic backgrounds have fought and died as one people to preserve this country’s freedoms and liberties, not to separate us or divide us into racial and ethnic groups.

America has always been known as a country of rugged individualism based on individual freedom and liberty, not race and ethnic origin. Most Americans do not care if Black people comprise 12.1% of the population or 14.3%. They do not care if Hispanic people comprise 19% or 28% of the population. The Racial and Ethnic classification of Americans is nothing more than institutionalized racism and must be ended. Rather than helping a diverse population become assimilated and united as one nation, the Federal government is doing what the Nazi government of Germany did in the 1930’s and 40’s; creating government supported institutionalized racism by the intentional classification of it’s citizens by race and ethnicity.

Americans are also beginning to realize that racial and ethnic identification is more a matter of personal choice than anything else. In the 2000 Census, seven million American citizens refused to place themselves into a single category by refusing to describe themselves as only white, black, Asian, Latino or any one of the other specific categories listed, because they were of mixed race. Attempts by the government to create a “mixed race” box for the 2000 Census was met with resistance by racial and ethnic special interest groups like the NAACP and the National Council of La Raza, because they feared that a mixed-race box could pose a danger to the justification for their existence.

The only groups that actively support the continued collection of racial and ethnic data are big government bureaucrats and "racial and ethnic special interest groups” that also happen to receive significant funding from the federal government. These organizations argue that identifying people by race and ethnicity is necessary in order to redress some past injustice and that the federal government must continue to collect and use this information in order to set up special racial and ethnic programs, affirmative action quotas and other set-asides for these groups, many of whom now consist of new immigrants, illegal aliens and non-citizens. Nothing can be further from the truth. In a country where we can no longer ask people what religion they are, what their party affiliation is or what their sexual orientation is, why are we still asking them about their racial and ethnic background?

The fuzzier such racial and ethnic categories become, the harder it will be for these racial and ethnic special interest groups and the government to traffic in them. If a mixed-race category were to be added, every brown-skinned person of mixed race registered in this category would shrink the government’s official count of Blacks, Latinos, Asians or American Indians, eventually reducing their political influence and ultimately the amount of money these groups receive from the federal government, which amounts to approximately $200 billion a year.

With the support of racial and ethnic special interest groups, our federal government seems to view our citizens not just as Americans, but rather as “pawns” in some social science experiment to be classified and separated into different racial or ethnic sub-groups for some unknown purpose. By mandating the classification of Americans into specific racial and ethnic sub-groups, the federal government and the advocates of “diversity” are actually perpetuating institutionalized racism and keeping Americans artificially divided. Maybe that is their real plan.

If we want to help poor Americans escape poverty, get better health care, find a job or get a good education, why should it matter what their race or ethnic background is? The answer is: It should not! Americans need to come together as members of one country and remember that we are all individual Americans, regardless of race or ethnic background. Martin Luther King, Jr., inspired a nation when he voiced his dream for a color-blind nation, a nation in which people would be judged by the content of their characters, "not the color of their skin."

The answer to this government encouraged racism is the concept of Liberty with a limited, constitutional government that is devoted to the protection of individual rights rather than the claims of different racial and ethnic special interest groups. Where Liberty is present, individual achievement and competence are rewarded, not people’s skin color or ethnicity.

The American people need legislation barring the federal government from the collection of racial and ethnic information about them and/or the classification of American citizens by race and ethnicity, including the collection of this data for census information. Exceptions should be made for law enforcement, hospitals and medical research purposes.

I am proud to be an American and it is none of the government’s business what my race, religion, sexual orientation or ethnic background is.

For Freedom, Liberty and Sovereignty,

John Wallace
www.4FLS.com

THE SWINE FLU SCARE IS COMING BACK

2009-09-06T10:42:00.000-07:00

Anyone who read a newspaper, listened to the radio, went on the internet or watched the evening news on TV back in April and May of 2009 might have believed that there was a real possibility that millions of Americans and hundreds of millions of other people throughout the world could be wiped out by the new deadly swine flu virus that was supposed to be sweeping across the globe.

The worldwide media was turning out countless numbers of stories and producing hundreds of TV special reports about the possibility of a swine flu pandemic, complete with on-site videos with people wearing face masks, colorful graphics and interviews with scores of medical experts-for-hire. But was all this news coverage based on a genuine concern for the health and safety of the people, or was it just media hype designed to sell newspapers, TV advertising, anti-flu medicines and vaccines?

By May 1, 2009, The World Health Organization reported only 331 cases of swine flu worldwide (outside of Mexico), but still declared the crisis to be at level 5 alert on a scale of 6, meaning that they considered this strain of flu an all-out pandemic. On the same date, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed that there were 109 cases in the U.S., with several states possibly confirming an additional 22 cases. Did these numbers indicate that a national crisis was at hand? We never did hear the final results of the suspected cases, because most of them turned out to be just the regular flu.

Let’s put these numbers in perspective: According to the Centers for Disease Control, 36,000 Americans die each year (almost 100 a day) from various forms of the flu virus, yet it is not considered a pandemic or a crisis. Worldwide, Malaria kills 3,000 people every day, but the World Health Organization only considers it "a health problem" and not a pandemic. Of course, there are no fancy vaccines for malaria that can rake in billions of dollars in a very short time period when governments and individuals order millions of doses of vaccines and medications in response to a threat of a new flu pandemic.

Back in 1976, when the Swine Flu last hit America, the Ford Administration tried to use the fear of a pandemic to force 220 million Americans to accept the idea of mandatory vaccinations. In a very short period of time, the pharmaceutical industry made $135 million on their vaccines, which had been given to nearly 40 million Americans before the accumulation of fatalities and crippling side effects caused the program to be stopped. When the questionable “pandemic threat” was over, only one person in America had died from the Swine flu, but 25 other Americans had died from the vaccine. By the way, the pharmaceutical companies managed to protect themselves from lawsuits by pre-arranging for the government to assume any liabilities in case there was a problem with the vaccines.

More recently, in 2006, there was another worldwide pandemic threat called the Avian flu. The same type of videos and stories appeared throughout the media. ABC News even pushed the possibility of a pending worldwide apocalypse to the public by featuring a doctor-for-hire who predicted “that 50% of the population of the world could die” because of the Avian flu. Of course that never happened. Although the death of any person is a tragedy, only 257 people in the entire world died from the Avian flu. That’s 257 people out of 6.5 billion. It could hardly be considered a pandemic or a worldwide health threat.

Because of the Avian Flu scare, the Bush Administration purchased and stockpiled millions of doses of anti-flu drugs in case of a future pandemic. Back then, some people thought that the threat of the Avian flu pandemic was cleverly created, manipulated and designed to frighten the American people, in order to line the pockets of politically connected investors and pharmaceutical companies.

If the profit motive was not part of the reason for the hype and the threat to the American people was real, then why did our government not take the overt actions necessary to protect its own citizens? With almost 2,000 official swine flu cases originating in Mexico, most European and Asian countries, including China, temporary closed their airports to flights from Mexico in order to protect their citizens. Our government took no such steps to protect its citizens against this threat and our borders remained wide open with no restrictions or limitations on Mexicans entering the United States.

The Department of Homeland Security advised that they were on top of the situation and were watching people entering the U.S. for signs of illness. On the surface that sounded like the government was at least doing something, until you read the April 27 Reuters report on what is really happening at the border and that “Mexicans were continuing to (illegally) cross the border by car and foot, seemingly unconcerned by the influenza scare and only a handful are wearing masks.” The failure to secure the border in a time of emergency in order to protect the health and welfare of American citizens was a clear sign that this administration had chosen political correctness over the safety of its own citizens. It’s sad to say, but I don’t believe a Republican administration would have taken the necessary steps either.

By mid-May the whole Swine Flu scare was over and the hype died down. The American borders were still wide open for illegal immigrants and terrorists to enter the country; the pharmaceutical companies made billions; the media companies made hundreds of millions from pharmaceutical company advertising and the administration took credit for a job well done. Thank God it wasn’t a real emergency!

Numerous doctors and scientists suspect that the swine flu virus was actually cultured in a laboratory. A mainstream Australian virologist, Adrian Gibbs …; who was one of the first to analyze the genetic properties of the 2009 swine flu …; believes that scientists accidentally created the H1N1 virus while producing vaccines. And Dr. John Carlo, Dallas Co. Medical Director, “This strain of swine influenza that’s been cultured in a laboratory is something that’s not been seen anywhere actually in the United States and the world, so this is actually a new strain of influenza that’s been identified.” Because of this, the 2009 swine flu virus …; which has yet to be detected in any animals …; has a rather suspicious pedigree.

Just wait until the 2009-2010 Flu season is upon us. The globalists will be at it again, trying to create another worldwide health crisis. The World Health organization will be issuing bulletins and will probably go to a level 6 Alert. Our elected and appointed government officials here in the U.S. will open command posts and will be operating in a panic mode. The pandemic stories and newscasts will be given worldwide exposure, followed by pharmaceutical ads. Some of our federal and state leaders might even call for mandatory vaccinations as they did in 1976.

The threat of a worldwide swine flu epidemic will again be blown way out of proportion. Yes, people will get sick, and yes people will die. That's typical for every yearly flu outbreak. What I am concerned about this time is the threats of mandatory vaccinations, which in themselves are a health hazard. These new vaccines haven't gone through the rigors of normal testing and we will run the risk of a repeat of what happened in the 1976 swine flu outbreak, where there were more deaths from the vaccine than from the flu itself.

Rather than taking a vaccine to fight a virus that may simply make us ill and we would build up a natural immunity to, it would be better and healthier to let the natural immunity happen.

When the 2009-2010 flu season is finally over, the results will be the same. More people will die from the regular flu and the swine flu vaccines, then will die from the actual swine flu. The media and the pharmaceutical companies will make billions of dollars and the World Health Organization and various governments around the world will take credit for a job well done. Thank God it will not be a real emergency!

By John Wallace
www.4FLS.com

PRIVATE INSURANCE TO BE ILLEGAL UNDER OBAMA HEALTH PLAN

2009-07-17T07:30:00.000-07:00

Hasn't President Obama repeatedly promised that under his proposed health care program, all Americans would still have the right to choose or stay in their private insurance plans if they wanted to?

Didn't the Democratic leadership in congress tell us that their proposed health plan was supposed to be the ideal legislation for the "Health Care for All Americans" and that it would still give us a choice?

Well guess what? President Obama and the Democrats have lied to us again.

Take a look at Page 16 of the 1,018 page proposed health plan for America and you will see that there is a provision in this proposed legislation that will eventually make individual private medical insurance illegal. That is correct. The private health insurance that many Americans enjoy today, will be illegal for their children and grandchildren under the proposed Obama plan.

When I first read the paragraph on July 15th, I thought that I surely must be mistaken. Maybe I was misreading the words. Can it be that once again, President Obama and the radical Democrats currently in control of the congress, have promised us one thing and are giving us the exact opposite again?

The answer is YES!

As you can see for yourself, the provision on page 16 clearly shows that their plan is to definitely make private individual health insurance illegal. Here's how they intend to do it. Under the new federal government's Politburo's NewSpeak header of "Protecting The Choice To Keep Current Coverage," the "Limitation On New Enrollment" section of the bill clearly states:

"Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day" of the year the legislation becomes law. This means that no new policies can be written by private insurers after the date the legislation becomes effective.

So my fellow Americans, we will still be able to keep our current coverage, just as our socialist government leaders have promised, but here is how most Americans will eventually lose their private health insurance:

1. Those who currently have private individual coverage won't be able to change it, and

2. Those who leave a company to work for themselves will no longer be able to buy individual plans from private health insurance carriers.

For years, opponents of the 'public option plan' have warned that if the government gets into the business of offering subsidized health insurance coverage, the private insurance market will wither away and die because they can't compete with mandatory government subsidized plans.
Employers, who now provide health insurance to their employees, including big corporations like Wal-Mart, will gladly give up their private plans because the public option plan will be 30% to 40% cheaper for them, courtesy of you and me, the American taxpayer.

In April of 2009, the nonpartisan Lewin Group estimated that 120 million or more Americans could lose their current employer provided group coverage at work and will have no choice but to end up in the government run socialized health program. That would leave private health insurance companies with less than 50 million potential health insurance customers, which would not be large enough to sustain the private health insurance market. This bill, if signed into law, will kill the market for private individual coverage because it does not allow any new policies to be written after the public option becomes law. Eventually, as more and more Americans are forced into the public option against their will, the private health insurance market will just whither away and die.

The legislation is also designed to finish off private health savings accounts, a goal that the Democrats in congress have had for years. They want to destroy this alternative because no other program gives individual Americans more control over their medical care, and gives the government less control, than these types of accounts. With Health Saving Accounts effectively made illegal under the proposed legislation, one of the key obstacles to the American socialists' expansion of the American welfare state will be overcome.

The dangers of the proposed 'public option' is that it will not be a real option for many Americans, but rather a government mandate for buying government designed care. Freedom loving Americans should be outraged at this advance of government imposed tyranny at the hands of our elected officials.

There is no constitutional authority for the federal government to outlaw private markets in which American citizens voluntarily participate. The Politburo in our curent federal government should not be proposing and passing legislation designed to destroy private business opportunities in America. It should be proposing and passing legislation that is designed to create private business opportunities.

It has taken a review of just a few pages of this proposed legislation to determine that this is a clear attempt to grow not only the size of our government, but to increase the government's control over our everyday lives. Imagine how many more attacks on our freedoms and liberties will be found in the entire document.

Remember that we cannot fully enjoy our freedoms and liberties in America unless our government is limited. As our government grows and becomes more intrusive, it is our freedoms and liberties that are becoming limited! The Obama Health Plan is definitely another attack on our freedoms and liberties.

Cap and Trade: A Disaster for America

2009-06-28T14:11:00.001-07:00

On June 26th, the House of Representatives passed the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 by a vote of 219 to 212. The bill, also know as “Cap and Trade” legislation, should more appropriately be called “Cap and Tax” legislation because the federal government is trying to “CAP” Americans’ Freedoms and then “TAX” the necessities of living like gas, food and even heating oil.

This bill, like so many other pieces of major federal legislation in recent years, was rammed through congress by the Democratic leadership without even giving the members the time to read it, let alone understand it, all in violation of their now worthless promise to create a more transparent legislative process. The Democrats added 300 pages of amendments to the legislation at 3:00AM on the day of the vote, giving the members of congress less than 12 hours to read the whole 1,200 page bill. Rep. Joe Barton asked repeatedly during the debate on Friday afternoon if there was even a copy of the bill anywhere in the House chamber and Democratic Rep. Ellen Tauscher, who was sitting in the speaker’s chair, repeatedly avoided the question. No full copy of the legislation was ever produced. What was the rush and why were the American people and their elected representatives denied the ability to read the bill before it was voted on? How does this help the American people?

Even the proponents of this massive tax bill acknowledge that it would only have a minimum impact on future concentrations of greenhouse gases and would only reduce the earth's future temperature by 0.1 to 0.2 degrees C by 2100, an amount too small to even notice. The truth is that there is no Global Warming crisis. That is why the proponents of global warming had to change the name to “climate change” because the earth is actually in a cooling cycle. All of the hype and threats of a looming climate crisis have been carefully manufactured and generated solely for the purpose of getting this massive bill through Congress, with a minimum of debate, before the American people realize that they have again been conned, lied to and of course, required to pay even more repressive taxes. How does this help the American people?

The current Democratic majority in Congress, aided by some cowardly Republicans, seem to be constantly working against the freedom, liberties and desires of the American people. They love the “cap and trade” concept because there is a fraudulent public perception that they are taxing evil corporate “polluters” and protecting the American people from global warming and pollution. This is simply not the truth. History shows us that once the government is allowed to create a scarce new commodity like the “rights to emit certain levels of carbon” and then creates the government control mechanism that mandates that all businesses that emit carbon must buy or otherwise obtain these “rights” from the government, the cost for these “rights” is inevitably passed on to all consumers in the form of higher prices at the wholesale and retail level. How does this help the American people?

Peter Orszag, former Director of the Congressional Budget Office and now Mr. Obama’s Budget Director, testified before Congress back in 2008 that “price increases are essential to the success of a cap-and-trade program.” The American Petroleum Institute claims this legislation would mean $4.00 or more for gas at the pump and will cost Americans billions of dollars in higher costs, kill jobs and will not deliver any of the environmental benefits promised. The Black Chamber of Commerce estimates the bill will result in a net loss of over 2 million jobs a year, that is in excess of any new "green" jobs that might be created. How does this help the American people?

Wouldn’t it be simpler just to impose stiff fines on the companies that pollute? Putting a price on these “rights” to carbon emissions is regressive because the burden to pay for these rights will ultimately fall disproportionately on the nation’s poor and middle-income households who spend a larger percentage of their paychecks on things like gas to drive to work, groceries or home heating. It also allows big polluters with a lot of money to keep polluting as long as they buy or somehow obtain these new “rights.” How does this help the American people?

The House version of the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 is a very clever scheme devised to redistribute income and wealth. Unlike Robin Hood, who took money from the rich to give to the poor, the federal government will be acting more like the evil Sheriff of Nottingham, because this legislation is designed to take money from the working class and the poor, in the form of high prices and give it to the Wall Street “green tech” investors, private bankers and “green energy” special interest groups who will be involved in the creation of a carbon emission “rights” trading system. How does this help the American people?

Not only will the cost of this Cap and Trade legislation drive up the price of everything that is manufactured in the United States, it will also make American made products more expensive and a great deal less competitive on the world markets. If enacted into law, it will begin the process of a massive transfer of manufacturing jobs and wealth from the United States to second and third world foreign countries that have no such restrictions on their manufacturing and energy producing companies. How does this help the American people?

This is not just a new massive tax increase on hard working American citizens, but rather it is a premeditated and calculated move to further take control of the American economy by the Politburo in the current federal government. This current “cap and trade” bill is bad legislation. It has been written by corrupt politicians and special interest groups for the benefit of those groups. If enacted as written, this bill will be as disaster for Americans in terms of the economy and their individual freedoms and liberties.

Americans must remember that we cannot fully enjoy our freedoms and liberties in America unless our government is limited. For as our government grows and becomes more intrusive, as it is today, it is our freedoms and liberties that are becoming limited!

Democrats Fight Move to Bar ACORN from Census Funds

2009-06-21T09:51:00.000-07:00

Iowa Republican Rep. Steve King introduced an amendment that would bar the Census Bureau from disbursing taxpayer funds to the activist group ACORN — but Democrats immediately squelched the measure, King disclosed.

In a release issued on Tuesday, after the amendment regarding the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now was introduced, King said: "It is time for every member of this Congress to go on record in support of or opposition to ACORN. ACORN and its estimated 270 corporate affiliates comprise a complex organizational and financial spider web with all the appearance of a criminal enterprise. ACORN is facing charges of voter fraud and tax violations, yet it has received over $53 million in taxpayer funds.

"Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank and his liberal friends have opened the taxpayers’ wallet to as much as an additional $8.5 billion that could be accessed by ACORN.
"ACORN could soon be running the 2010 census if President Obama, a former ACORN employee, follows through on plans to have ACORN ‘partner’ with the Census Bureau. It is time to cut off ACORN’s access to taxpayer dollars and put an end to ACORN’s involvement in the 2010 census."

On Wednesday, King's office issued another release that read in part: "Last night, Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi and Democrat leaders passed a gag rule to ensure" that King’s amendment "never made it to the House floor."

King stated, "This Pelosi Congress is violating its commitments to the American people so it can protect its political cronies like ACORN . . .

"Democrats refuse to allow a debate, let alone cut off ACORN’s access to the taxpayers’ wallet . . .
"Justice demands that Congress cut off ACORN’s access to taxpayer dollars and put an immediate end to ACORN’s involvement in the 2010 census."

Rep. King told Newsmax in early June that he believes ACORN "has completely the face of a criminal enterprise, and it should be thoroughly investigated by Congress and the Department of Justice."